Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING .....Dr. Bussard past Assis. Direct EAC, on fusion reactor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 12:24 AM
Original message
BREAKING .....Dr. Bussard past Assis. Direct EAC, on fusion reactor
Edited on Tue Nov-28-06 12:38 AM by FogerRox
Should Google Go Nuclear? Clean, cheap, nuclear power (no, really)


Google Tech Talks November 9, 2006

ABSTRACT This is not your father's fusion reactor! Forget everything you know about conventional ... all » thinking on nuclear fusion: high-temperature plasmas, steam turbines, neutron radiation and even nuclear waste are a thing of the past. Goodbye thermonuclear fusion; hello inertial electrostatic confinement fusion (IEC), an old idea that's been made new. While the international community debates the fate of the politically-turmoiled $12 billion ITER (an experimental thermonuclear reactor), simple IEC reactors are being built as high-school science fair projects.

Dr. Robert Bussard, former Asst. Director of the Atomic Energy Commission and founder of Energy Matter Conversion Corporation (EMC2), has spent 17 years perfecting IEC, a fusion process that converts hydrogen and boron directly into electricity producing helium as the only waste product. Most of this work was funded by the Department of Defense, the details of which have been under seal... until now.

Dr. Bussard will discuss his recent results and details of this potentially world-altering technology, whose conception dates back as far as 1924, and even includes a reactor design by Philo T. Farnsworth (inventor of the scanning television).

Can a 100 MW fusion reactor be built for less than Google's annual electricity bill? Come see what's possible when you think outside the thermonuclear box and ignore the herd....


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1996321846673788606

Prior efforts have been the Tokomak reactors, Tokomaks are donut shaped. The SUN is a sphere, this reactor is a sphere too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. I know...
I posted this. This man lost his funding because of cuts for Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I saw it at KOS
This is brilliant

TOKOMAKS are donuts

Does the SUN look like a donut to you?

EXACTLY.

Thats why Tokomaks haven't worked properly. They aren't spheres, LIKE THE SUN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I found it on slashdot...
and it pissed me off.

It may not be as promising as he says it is, but it does seem worth a shot since the technology is far cheaper to experiment with than the TOKAMAKS.

In fact you may remember a young lad who built a fusion reactor in his basement, that is a similar type of reactor.

The problem with the kid's reactor has basically been solved by Dr. Bussard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I must say, I am glad people are picking this up...
it could save this project.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Its so simple its stupid
TOKOMAKS are donuts, The sun is a sphere, so why would the TOKOMAK even work? SO... DR. Bussard made a sphere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. That belies such a fundamental misunderstanding
of science and technology that I wouldn't even know where to begin.

Reminds me a little of the "doctrine of signatures" in medicine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thanks for the condescension - adds to the discussion
This attitude is why I don't bother with the Energy/Environment forums any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. I wonder what sort of Personality Disorder compels me to go there?
I love the snarkiness and condescension. Otherwise it would all be gallows humor.

We are killing the earth because we are ignorant. Sorry if that stings, but it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #22
41. It's a combination of willful ignorance and greed in our leaders
The ordinary citizen is deprived of information and deliberately misled on environmental issues, like most everything else coming out of MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Tokamak reactors run on a different confinement principle than the sun.
Tokamak reactors use magnetic fields to confine the high-energy plasma of the fusion reaction. To do this, you have to have a torus shape, due to what's known as the "hairy ball theorem" (I swear I'm not joking). The bottom line is that in order to have a stable magnetic containment field, the lines of force essentially have to be able to flow in a perfect circle, which isn't possible with a sphere.

The sun, on the other hand, is confined by its own gravitational force, and by the vacuum around it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 09:48 AM
Original message
Bussard is using a centrally focused magnetic field design...
because that isn't possible with a single magnetic field, he's using multiple fields arranged in a polyhedral with each vertex having an even number of faces. This leads to "point cusps" where particles can escape. So he's hoping for a "whiffle ball" effect...trapping the particles for a sufficient number of core transits before the particle escapes through one of the holes in the whiffle ball.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Are you serious?
The sun is round because of GRAVITY

Will we use GRAVITY to start/maintain the fusion reaction? I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. I am not serious, I am Roger, ... ahight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. Univ of Wisconson, is right behind Bussard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Self delete - posted wrong spot...
Edited on Tue Nov-28-06 09:49 AM by Junkdrawer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
37. Is the Wisconsin group taking the same approach with the IEC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. Wow! K&R!!
Thanks so much for the link!! I am admittedly not a physics freak, and wasn't sure about being able to follow all his points but he was such a good presenter, and such a smart man! I hope he's able to document those 12 yrs of research quickly...

I would hope that some very smart, very rich people here in the US would see the potential of continuing this research. It sounds so incredibly promising! And I think he's right - if no one here in the US will do it, China will...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. So how many countries do we have to invade to corner the boron market?
Inquiring minds are probably gonna wanna know ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felinity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. K& R Let's keep this bumped. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrownPrinceBandar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. Kick for sensible energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StraightDope Donating Member (716 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. Nov. 9 isn't exactly "breaking", now is it?
That aside, everyone who understands physics and chemistry should watch this. THIS is the wave of the future. Bussard's IEC fusion device is going to change the world, mark my words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porkrind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
17. Also, check these guys out...
http://focusfusion.org

They use a relatively simple gadget called a "dense plasma focus", and have gotten good results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. It's time for the full scale model.
Edited on Tue Nov-28-06 10:41 AM by Gregorian
Since scaling is a factor of the power 7, it's full scale or bust.

With the energy situation the way it is, this is going to get a lot of attention.

After Googling a while, I haven't come up with a single bad comment on either the idea nor Bussard. And what I find interesting is that he personally has posted answers to questions on forums. And everything he proposes is within the confines of the known physics.

Here is the basic idea, collected from some sources on other forums I found. Using inertial electrostatic confinement they're precipitating palladium and deuterium out of solution (electrolysis), and as this occurs (perhaps) some limited and low temperature nuclear reactions are taking place.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_W._Bussard

I have a reputation here for dismissing new ideas on the energy forum. In fact, almost everything that has been posted. That is because like so many others, I've become pessimistic about the prospects of fusion coming to reality. From defunding to research failures. What difference does it make if you have an electric car, but we still generate the electricity with petroleum powered plants? Now we're talking. And the guy even knows where to go and make his speech. This is so threatening to the oil tycoons. But Google has more cash than just about any other benign business group on the planet.

Well, it's time to get up and start this day. The big fusion reactor in the sky has risen.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
19. I'm ready for my free energy as soon as they want to send it
hurry up. Like to die with at least one penny in my pocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
20. The guy needs $200,000,000. We spend that much every day in Iraq.
Our priorities suck.
I have been watching the developments in fusion for over 40 years now and this is the first time that I have felt that someone was really on to something!
He should take his Idea to Bill Gates. Google is all committed to their wonderful nano solar work and I do not know if they are ready to wrap their heads around this one. I was quite dissapointed to see the audience attrition during the talk.

Better yet:
He should take it to Hugo Chaves! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Well the google video was recorded at Google ..
So I hope the Dr. is in good hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
21. Is there any way to get this information in front of Al Gore?
Dr. Bussard needs to raise $200 million to make this happen.

He is past the point in life where he has energy to go looking for money.

Somebody like Gore has the ability to raise the capital as well as the interest in saving the planet.

I had his cell number, but I lost it...;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Richard Branson (Virgin Airlines) pledged $3 billion for alt. energy...
Branson pledges $3B to global warming fight

CBC News

British billionaire Richard Branson said Thursday he would donate $3 billion US over 10 years to anti-global warming initiatives.

The founder of the Virgin group of companies pledged all profits from his transportation and airline businesses, which will then be invested in efforts to find renewable, sustainable energy sources in an effort to wean the world off oil and coal.

...



http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2006/09/21/tech-branson-060921.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I Googled up this blog link....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Thanks - If this reactor is feasible, then we could fly planes on ethanol
Or hydrogen...

Extremely cheap energy makes all kinds of things possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #25
42. Ethanol, hell, we could run transcontinental flights on water.
One of the cool things about fusion reactors is that they make so much more possible than just power. Envision a vehicle powered by a fusion drive, which basically uses its own superheated plasma as a propellant. Such a craft wouldn't be energy limited like a modern jetliner. You could literally take off near vertically, head out past the atmosphere, whip around the planet, and land again--all in a fraction of the time that it would take going through the air.

And that's not all: Richard Branson really needs to give this guy money. Do you know what a fusion-drive spacecraft could do? Put it this way: with a chemically propelled craft, you can reach the Moon in six days, Mars in six months. With a fusion drive, you could reach the Moon in six HOURS, and Mars in six WEEKS. Not to mention reducing the cost to lift from Earth from thousands of dollars a pound to nearly nothing. You think a hundred grand for a Virgin Galactic flight into space is expensive and not compelling? How about twenty grand for a three month round-trip cruise to the Red Planet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. I posted an addendum at KOS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
29. Kicked. This can be done with a gov't that speaks for the people! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
30. So what happens with a large amount of helium emissions?
Is there a bad/unforeseen side effect of that? I admit that I don't know, that's why I'm asking the question.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Excellent point ... IIRC
The Helium is recycled or burned. In fact they are saying they could "Burn" the current stockpile of Nuke waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Doesn't helium cause us to laugh hysterically?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. I don't know.
Is this thread made of helium? Because it's making me laugh hysterically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. No, it's the sound of your voice that makes OTHERS laugh hysterically
After you've inhaled some helium, that is. It is funny, now, I don't care who you are ...

Actually, my original question was serious, and I appreciate FogerRox's answer.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Bake, I took it as serious, it seemed like you checked out
IEC fusion enough to know that Helium is the waste product. Though I think its in the video that the Dr. describes its recycling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
36. After Dinner kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
38. If you want to read every little detail on this device, here's the patent.
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4826646.PN.&OS=PN/4826646&RS=PN/4826646


I found this (which may represent any one of Bussard's ideas.) while searching for an answer to the question that lurks with me. That is, how does this reactor actually make electrical current to output to the world. He mentions in his google talk that it can be used in the typical steam turbine generator plant. That would be heat exchange. In this patent I do see where there is a direct electrical connection. But after thirty five pages of searching, I kind of got fuzzy.

Alright. Good night world! It's off to bed I go. Or as my dad used to say Shadrack and to bed you go! Sorry, that's hideous biblical humor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. I found 2 of his patents. Years apart too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
40. kick for today...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC