berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-29-06 09:12 PM
Original message |
1,000,000 people dead because of Iraq |
|
The Study by MIT that was recently published in The Lancet reports that over 600,000 Iraqi civilians have died as a result of the Iraq War started by the Bush Administration in 2003.
According to SaveDarfur.org, over 400,000 people have been killed in Darfur.
If a real President had been in power, we would never have gone to war with Iraq and we likely would have prevented hundreds of thousands of deaths in Darfur.
The Bush Administration even RECOGNIZES GENOCIDE in Darfur! Why aren't we acting to stop it? Because we are stuck in a war we never should have started.
|
sam sarrha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-29-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message |
1. we killed 500,000 in the first gulf war |
mike_c
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-29-06 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. then another million on Clinton's watch, half of them children.... |
sam sarrha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-29-06 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Link....???? i believe it was saddam that killed his own people.. |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-29-06 10:56 PM by sam sarrha
|
mike_c
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-29-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-29-06 11:10 PM by mike_c
|
Smarmie Doofus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-29-06 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. I don't dispute this but what's your source? n/t |
mike_c
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-29-06 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. self delete-- replied to wrong post.... |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-29-06 11:12 PM by mike_c
sorry
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-29-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message |
3. No, we probably wouldn't have gone into Darfur anyway. |
|
Although I must say, now that the massacres have spilled over into neighboring countries, the possibility of international intervention seems much more viable.
Generally, when a nation chooses to murder its own citizens, the rest of the world does not interfere. When it gets carried away and starts to murder another nation's citizens, only then is real attention paid.
I'm sure it's in some book of international etiquette.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:34 PM
Response to Original message |