madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 04:36 PM
Original message |
Jack Cafferty's questions today, Good questions that need good answers |
|
4 p.m.: Can the United States win the war on terror without "re-examining" the First Amendment?
5 p.m.: Did the meeting between President Bush and Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki change your mind about Iraq?
7 p.m.: What other recommendations would you make to the incoming Congress in January?
|
Sherman A1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 04:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Q;What other recommendations would you make to the incoming Congress in January?
A: To preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States as our current occupant of the White House seems incapable of doing so.
|
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Hurry the hell up and start the investigations of this evil administration |
|
we have a mad man in the whitehouse and he needs to be stopped.
|
cspanlovr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Answers for cube rats: |
|
Yes, it can, but it will take some thought and hard work, something that is absent in Washington these days. If we do not keep our rights and values, what is there to fight terror for. Scott, Wash.
First habeas corpus went kaput, now its the First Amerndment. Apparently, those who are sworn to "uphold and defend" the constitution have decided to "upend and define" it instead.
For this administration, why not just burn what's left of our Constitution and Bill of Rights and be done with it? Bush has already gotten a good start on violating the 10 commandments as well. Craig, Fla.
|
melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 06:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
First of all, the notion that there is a "War on Terror" is ridiculous. Terrorism is a tactic, not an enemy. Second, this attempt at "Re-examining the First Amendment" is not intended to protect us, it is a means to control the American public with fear-mongering.
|
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. You are right on both counts |
|
and those facts make it hard to answer the questions asked but answer I did.
|
melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. I hope your answer was NO |
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Democrats should start with: You've got some splaining to do!
Republicans will answer: Its all Clinton's fault!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:21 AM
Response to Original message |