Miller v. Bank of America (Cal. Ct. App. - Nov. 20, 2006)
This case is about a class action lawsuit in which Bank of America was charged with illegally seizing social security payments and other public benefit payments to cover various unrelated bank fees (primarily NSF and overdraft fees). A California Supreme Court opinion from 1974 generally doesn't allow banks to seize government benefit payments to offset unrelated charges, but this case is arguably distinguishable from the present one.
I'll leave you in suspense about how the class action comes out. Read this
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/A110137.PDF">relatively short opinion by Justice Siggins for the answer. I'll instead only ask a single question:
Guess how much in NSF and overdraft fees Bank of America has obtained from the class (people who directly deposit their social security and other government benefit checks into BOA accounts) during the class period, which is between January 1994 and May 2003?
What do you think? How much did they earn? Come on. Guess.
Would you believe: $284,211,273.
Wow. That's a freaking lot of change.
http://calapp.blogspot.com/ Let's see, $284,211,273/$600 = 473685.
So they in effect got the entire checks of 473,685 Social Security recipients. And that's just in California. (The $600 is a guess attempt to average out the payments for from 1994 to 2003 and may not be accurate.)