Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 12:15 PM
Original message |
IF Bush cared about bipartisanship--cared about this country--he would nominate |
|
Bill Clinton to take Bolton's place at the UN. The world would love it. THAT would be the only lasting good legacy of this failed Presidency.
|
no_hypocrisy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message |
1. What, nominate his brother, and I don't mean Jeb |
Nickster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I vaguely recalled some discussion about that scenario being something |
|
that President Clinton was actively campaigning for back before the 04 election.
|
itsmesgd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The first five words of the topic line are wrong. * does not care. He is incapable of thought, diplomacy, and reason. He is a lesser evolved chimpanzee.
|
BushOut06
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message |
4. If Bush cared about this country, he would resign |
|
At least Nixon had the common sense to resign, and Nixon's crimes pale in comparison to this president's.
|
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message |
5. The probability of that happening is zero |
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 12:27 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I doubt BC would take the job! He's having a great time doing what |
|
HE wants to do whenever HE wants to. I don't think he would want to be tied down to a mandatory job like that.
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 12:33 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Drudge says (yeah, yeah, I know it's drudge) George Mitchell |
|
is on the short list to named as ambassador to the UN. I don't believe it, but wouldn't that be just fantastic?
|
Old and In the Way
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 12:34 PM
Response to Original message |
8. He's never done anything in a bi-partisan way. Only his way. |
|
And even if he got a clue that bi-partisanship would be a good thing, his jealousy of Clinton's obvious superior diplomatic/communication skills would preclude him from ever allowing Clinton a stage to work from. Bush is a very insecure, little man and would never allow Clinton an opportunity to remind us of how far we've fallen with the Bush selection.
|
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
9. No matter how hard they tried..they could never make Clinton be |
|
less than popular and inspiring. They'll never put him somewhere with a platform. He is too powerful. Cause he actually connects to people and cares.
|
Az
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-04-06 05:40 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Um... you are aware that he's not bipartisan.... right? |
|
Just because he learned to use the word bipartisan doesn't mean he knows what it means or actively practices it.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:14 PM
Response to Original message |