OneBlueSky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-13-06 04:13 AM
Original message |
Ten Least Fascinating People of 2006 . . . (the Top Ten Bores) . . . |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-13-06 04:18 AM by OneBlueSky
|
GreenZoneLT
(805 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-13-06 04:16 AM
Response to Original message |
1. How can you leave Paris Hilton off that list? |
|
I mean, geez, at least Rachael Ray can cook a little. What can Paris do?
|
justice1
(483 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-13-06 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. No kidding, I was expecting her to be number 1. |
Leftisalwaysright
(112 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-13-06 05:03 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Gotta love end of the year lists!
I agree with this one more or less, but I think Paris is in a category of her own!
|
ClintonTyree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-13-06 05:49 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Katie Holmes without Tom Cruise? |
|
You can't have one without the other. As a whole I can see them making the list by why single our Katie? Without Tom by her side she wouldn't make the list at all. They fall into my "who the fuck cares" list, but as a pair, not singly.
Yeah, and no Paris, or Britney? I guess if there's only ten spots you have to draw the line somewhere but they're the poster girls for lists like these, aren't they? :shrug:
|
rpannier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-13-06 05:58 AM
Response to Original message |
5. There's a group of people that would be put on the rocket to the sun |
|
Just looking at those names bores the hell out of me.
|
Sherman A1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-13-06 08:12 AM
Response to Original message |
|
that I care not one wit about...... Year end lists..... What a waste of time.
|
On the Road
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-13-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Whatever You Think of Him, I Would Not Consider Donald Trump a Bore |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 02:16 AM
Response to Original message |