2Design
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-13-06 10:41 AM
Original message |
only candidates against IRAQ - if they voted for Iraq they are not good decision makers |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-13-06 10:46 AM by 28erl
if those of us here knew it was a bad idea and the senators did not - then I don't want them leading our country because they are not smart enough to think and make decisions that are good for the whole -
I knew during the first election that if * got into office - there would be a war - period - anyone who could not figure that out - does not deserve to lead this great country -
so far the only ones to do that are Dennis Kunich and Howard Dean
Anyone who waffles about how or why they voted for war - we don't need - if they can not or will not find another way to change things in the world other than war games we don't need them
Teaching our young to hate and kill people is not good for this world - Our are Being TRAINED to kill
The DC sniper and Timonthy McVeigh were trained by the USA killers who never shut off that switch once returning home - how many messed up young lives on both sides do we need to know war is no good.
I want a anti-war candidate who is a good negotiator and can talk intelligently.
|
ayeshahaqqiqa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-13-06 10:43 AM
Response to Original message |
1. That was one reason I was for Dean and Kucinich |
|
in 2004. They spoke out against the war.
|
Lefty-Taylor
(310 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-13-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Exactly. They aren't worthy of office. eom |
mike_c
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-13-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message |
3. agreed 100 percent.... |
Jcrowley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-13-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 03:46 PM
Response to Original message |