Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN: Bush* is bending over backwards to forward bipartasanship.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:06 AM
Original message
CNN: Bush* is bending over backwards to forward bipartasanship.
I say when he physically does that, the democrats should shove a copy of the constitution up his ass and impeach him. NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. CNN is full of
er....ummmm....it!

Bush is still in his my way or the highway routine...this crap about pubsing bipartasnship is coming right off of Rove's fax machine....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmmitFitzhume Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Is this another Obama like "typo" incident
or just an example of the high quality of political analysis courtesy of CNN? We should just ignore them from now on and maybe they will go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. They forgot the part where he has already
dropped his pants and he is bending over giving us the big "kiss my ass"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. bush is a very cunning and manipulative jerk
he is asking the flies to come into his web. Kind of interesting analogy but it fits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. He is also playing to his base. They will believe anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why Now
My question is why now should the Democrats try to work in a bipartisan manner? For four years Bush pushed his agenda down their throats barely allowing them to debate issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. maybe because Bush's approval ratings are so low
Bush is grasping for straws or bipartisanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, that is the traditional position we are used to...
when it comes to him. There's usually shit flying out of it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'll take actual reality to block, Peter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lowell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. Sure Mr Bush, when

Get over it, you lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. "bipartisanship" (per GOP): Surrender to the GOP agenda.
Innately oppressive/repressive perspectives always call it 'cooperation' when people surrender and comply with the "might makes right" attitudes of despots and oppression.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. ONLY because he knows payback is a bitch
After six years of shutting out Democrats and making them irrelevant to government, he is terrified that they will do the same now to the Republicans. Now, and only now, does he give a rat's tail about bipartisanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. It's just posturing for the public, it's not real. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. This constant liar will not change his stripes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
14. They don't of course point out that "bipartisanship" to bush means
both parties doing whatever bush tells them to.

"National security" means securing other nations' oil.

"Liberation" means illegal invasion and occupation.

OBL "dead or alive" means "I don't really care".

Et fucking al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
15. We gained political capital in the last election.
Perhaps Mr. Bush should ask KKKarl Rove what that means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. And we intend to spend it George!
Bush will keep right on grinding the GOP into dirt! The smart GOPer, if there is such a thing saw the writing on the wall in November. The Stupid GOPers, who still march in goose-step with the fool in chief, will be history very soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
18. Bush had 100% power If he doesn't get bi-partisanship his power is in the toilet
Of course he is ordering the media to push the idea of the Democrats handing power back to the GOP in the name of bi-partisanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
19. Oh, that's what * is - an acrobat. He should resign and join a circus.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC