Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

why do pres. candidates point/count with a raised thumb, not a finger?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 10:49 AM
Original message
why do pres. candidates point/count with a raised thumb, not a finger?
what PR cuntsultant taught them that showing a finger, any finger, is improper in US political circles? Watching Hillary yesterday, Obama the day before, Lindsay Graham and Joe Biden on MTP today, and McCain all last week, they make points by closing their fist and pointing up with their thumb.

BOYS, GIRLS, CHILDREN OF ALL AGES, STOP THAT SHIT! it is irritating, fake and distracting. Why not use a natural, real, and honest gesture, if you gesture at all? A raised thumb tells me that you are a creation of inside the bloatway bullscheiss, and therefore, you are primped, prepared, packaged, polled, even freeze-dried. Preparation is one thing, but damn it, having a live person talk naturally would make me feel one hell of a lot better.

I think we should respond to this crap by making the closed fist/raised thumb mean something really nasty - like the wiki definition of Santorum.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ever since Bill Clinton it came into vouge. It is irritating isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. i don't recall who started it, Kennedy, perhaps?
I was but a child, but I seem to recall him doing it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Kennedy did it a bit, but Clinton raised it to an art form
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Tony Blair does this too.
Edited on Sun Jan-07-07 11:28 AM by CJCRANE
I'm pretty sure he got it from Clinton.

on edit: New Labour was heavily influenced by Clinton's "Third Way" and triangulation ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrwellwasRight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. I agree, irritating.
But worse is the habit of not answering questions, just repeating talking points. And they do it on both sides unless we are talking Dennis Kucininch and Al Sharpton. Let's work on that first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. no kidding. substantive answers instead of Poll-filtered pap.
what a relief that would be.

That is why 6 yrs ago, McCain had an indie following, even if most of his ideas were ultraconservative. He spent time with the press, face time, answered questions, and did not rely on polls to craft his "message". Now, he has the Bush bug. He has measured, weighed, and carved out answers as carefully as the boy king did in 2000, using the reicht code words, and pandering like a bipolar bear on a shriking ice floe. I suspect that his ex-Bush advisors have a lot to do with that.

Good for us. moderates and indies that appreciated a breath of broken wind and fresh air back then, will not be sucked in here again. Only McCain does not realize it yet.

On the other side, Hillary has yet to produce one answer to any question that has not been dissected, diced, detailed, diagrammed, dieted, divided, and deliberated in advance. It makes her look unreal, and unpleasant. Compound that with her strong aversion to any hot issue, and you have a media group created candidate. And a majority of voters who do not trust, like and believe her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrwellwasRight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Great point about McCain.
I never thought about it that way, but I think you've hit the nail on the head. Even I (a self-identified socialist) found myself thinking McCain was likable and reasonable for a Republican, and in general I DON'T LIKE THEM, don't like what they stand for,or believe in.

On Hillary -- I couldn't agree more. I was no Bill fan, and I am certainly not a Hillary fan. She is hated by many across the spectrum of the right and by those (like me) on the far left. I hate that she "sucks up" to the right by being a war hawk, sponsoring the anti-flag burning amendment, and being wishy-washy on abortion rights. Didn't we learn from Kerry that this attempting to play both sides simply doesn't work?

People may say that the American public is stupid, but they frequently know a phony when they see one, and she is as big a phony as I have seen in a long time. I don't understand why people get into politics if they are not passionate about the issues in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Senator Clinton
did not co-sponsor the flag-burning amendment, and in fact, voted against it.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00189
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrwellwasRight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Try taking a look at S. 1911 (109th Congress)
And yes I was sloppy in saying she sponsored a flag burning "amendment" when what she sponsored was a flag burning "law." And I never stated how she voted because I know that she voted no on the bill that came to the floor (which was a bill to amend the Constitution).

However, her co-sponsorship of this legislation is the worst kind of pandering to the right; and she now leaves herself open to charges of flip-flopping on the issue by the simpleton mainstream media, who gloss over nuance to create controversy.

For me, the nuance is pointless in any case-- no politician who claims to believe in "democracy" (small d) should be supporting this kind of bullshit restriction on free speech rights -- whether by Constitutional Amendment or otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. to me the nuance is NOT pointless
claiming she sponsored a constitutional amendment, when in fact she did not, and even voted AGAINST that amendment, is the same kind of silly freeper arguments against most Dems - claim they did something they never did, then hate them for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. I know! How weird!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. In the Arab/Southwest Asian world, 'thumbs up' means 'up your ass'
It is as vulgar there as the upraised middle finger is here, or the V for Victory sign, flipped, is, in some European countries.

Puts a whole new aspect on this, eh:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Of course that originally meant "let him live"; thumbs down meant "kill him".
This is how Roman emporers ruled on gladitorial contests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judaspriestess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. I thought it was because
generally when many people speak to you, they have a tendency to point their finger at you, not in a disrespectful way but it can be taken as being aggressive. The raised thumb is a kindler gentler version of pointing your index finger.

just IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chorophyll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. That's what I heard too.
They don't want to look like they're scolding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. I was told this is the way Germans do it -- thumb first, then first finger ...
don't know how widespread that is in other European countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. To show it isn't in their ass? - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammythecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. I always find it distracting
when someone does that. I don't get it. Seems backward to me, as well as awkward. Try holding up 3 fingers and your thumb to represent 4.

I've never seen fans or athletes demonstrating their "number one'ness" by using their thumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nedbal Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
19. I bet the OP is a old timer that used to use a rotary dial phone and not a blackberry user


times have changed, people text with their thumbs and in general use thumbs to press and point, as opposed to earlier generations. hey I grew up with rotary phones and still have 2, of the 8 phones in this house

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. heh? You gotta speak up. My hearing aid batteries ran out.
unfortunately, I have a blackberry, and several laptops (dual chip macs) but no rotary phones. In fact, no landline to the house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC