Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Religious Right Groups Join Immigration Debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 05:37 PM
Original message
Religious Right Groups Join Immigration Debate
After staying out of last year’s contentious immigration debate that drove a wedge among the GOP, mainstays of the Religious Right have now joined the debate saying they will support legalization of those already in this country – but only in exchange for doing away with the guarantee of birthright citizenship granted under the 14th Amendment. As CBN reported on Friday, Manuel Miranda, one of the chief activists organizing the Right in support of Bush’s extreme judicial nominees, has now put together a coalition of Religious Right leaders to influence immigration policymaking. In an attempt to supplant the anti-immigrant rhetoric that dominated discussions last year which analysts agree resulted in damaging the image of the GOP among Latino voters and decreased support for GOP candidates, Miranda claims “This new coalition is bigger and broader than the Secure Border Coalition that dominated the debate on the right in the last go round.”

Headline members include Paul Weyrich, one of the founders of “movement conservatism,” Donald Wildmon of American Family Association, Gary Bauer, American Conservative Union President David Keene, and Lou Sheldon of the Traditional Values Coalition.

Today The Washington Times gives some details of the “grand compromise” sought by Families First on Immigration.

"In letters sent today and obtained by The Washington Times, Families First on Immigration urges President Bush and leaders of the new Democratic Congress to adopt a grand compromise on the divisive issue that includes strong border security, an amnesty for illegals already here who are relatives of citizens and an end to birthright citizenship."

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/01/religious_right_11.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. But the more immigrants we allow, the more people the religious wrong can harass.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. They've been wanting to get rid of that for a long time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. What part of the constitution do these extremists support?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. The 2nd Amendment, of course.
Everything else is considered disposable by these folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sorry, but you don't bargain away the Constitution
Specifically, the 14th Amendment, which defines citizens as anyone born or naturalized in the US.

I shudder to think what other little changes to the Constitution the Religious Right (which is neither, by the way) has in mind.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. What's the deal with doing away with citizenship for a baby born here?
I'm not sure how many countriesdo this, but my neice had 2 of her 4 children in Japan while her and her husband were stationed there. Both of those children have dual citizenship. I honestly thought this was pretty standard stuff in most countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Some of these people really think that there are hordes of
aliens who, immediatly upon finding themselves pregnant, set out to hike for three days across the desert, risking themselves and their unborn, simply to be able to have the child born in the US.

Morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Your niece's children are Japanese citizens only if one of the parents is Japanese.
Japanese nationality law

Japan is a jus sanguinis state, meaning that it recognizes citizenship by blood, not by birth (as is the case in the United States, Ireland and many other countries). Article 2 provides three situations in which a person can become a Japanese national at birth:
1. When either parent is a Japanese national at the time of birth
2. When the father dies before the birth and is a Japanese national at the time of death
3. When the person is born on Japanese soil and both parents are unknown or stateless
These rules are very strictly applied, which often creates problems for unmarried non-Japanese mothers. In such cases, unless the Japanese father gives express recognition of paternity before the birth, the child is generally not recognized as a Japanese national.


Moreover,
Legal issues

By Japanese laws, adult persons generally cannot hold both foreign citizenship and Japanese citizenship (dual nationality):

· those who have acquired dual nationality before age 20 must choose a single nationality before reaching age 22.

· those who have acquired dual nationality after age 20 must choose a single nationality in 2 years.

Many who naturalize as Japanese also adopt a Japanese name, although this is not required.

No law forbids a foreign-born Japanese to be elected as a member of Diet (as Marutei Tsurunen in fact became one), thus in theory they may become the Prime Minister of Japan.

Algeria similarly does not prohibit foreign-born people who hold Algerian citizenship from running for high office. One such instance is the current president, Abdelaziz Bouteflika, who was born in Morocco.

Probably because of the difficulty of gaining citizenship and because of cultural difference, foreign-born Japanese people account for a very small percentage of the demography in Japan. Unlike some countries where people born natively are automatically given a citizenship, many who are born and live in Japan permanently, particularly Korean and Chinese, tend to maintain their citizenship. There has been a constant discussion among the government and lawmakers whether to give them some status similar to that of a permanent resident in the United States.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I don't know anything about Japanese law. Iam only quoting what my
sister in law told me. The father was a military officer in the US Marines, and they were stationed in Japan for 4 years. His wife gave birth to two childrenin that time, and my sister in law(the wifes mother) told me the children had dual citizenship.

In all honesty, I don't think it matters much. They have moved back to the States, the husbandhas a job in the Homeland Security Agency in Pa. and I doubt they'll ever go back to Japan. I guess my post was about other countriesand how they deal with children in their country. You may be right, but mybrother in lawhas always been a very sharp guy, and I'd be very surprised if he had this wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. My daughter was born in Japan and I know she is not eligible for Japanese citizenship. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. LOL
"religious"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. oh, this is a gas
does this mean if the fundies wipe out birthright citizenship, we can strip them of citizenship and deport all of them to the fundamentalist wacko country of our choice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. It took them this long to come up with a stand on illegal immgration?
I guess they really are behind the times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC