Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What did Brian Williams & Russert Learn in Their Pre-Speech Conference With Bush?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:39 PM
Original message
What did Brian Williams & Russert Learn in Their Pre-Speech Conference With Bush?
They were obviously 'concerned' about what they learned, and stated they could not quote Bush as part of the ground rules. Brian Williams even held up his press notepad he said was full of quotes.

Williams said Bush gave them "a tour of the world" which included Bush's thinking and plans on matters around the world. (This would necessarily include Iran or Syria without naming them).
They ended the segment saying they would have to report on it "carefully.'

Someone is bound to know what was revealed to Williams and/or Russert, or any other MSM reporter present.

From the demeanor and carefully chosen words, it would be easy to suspect something significant is up that they could not talk about.

Where are the leaks when we need them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. I saw this exchange last night, and I feel that they are both very concerned
about what was said in that meeting with Bush, and what the future may hold.

The fact that there don't seem to be any leaks at this point is what concerns me. :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. They might have found out that he is completely out of the loop
That he has lost it or that he is just a suit at this point (not that he was ever much more than that)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. When Tweety mentioned "Iran", there was a lot of squirming in the chairs.
If nothing else, our Democratic Political Animals in Congress have got to quit covering their asses and projecting to the next election long enough to keep Iran out of the picture. Whatever it takes -- and that includes impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. They're reporters - so report.
It really bugs me that they went to a meeting w/Bush, learned some sort of earth-shattering revelation, and are now refusing to share it with us. They're not Bush's employees - as journalists, their only responsibility is to us, the public. If Bush told them something important, they need to spit it out, or they're just a bunch of cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think we need to look no further than the speech itself
It was a nice segway to get people to start associating Iraq with Iran. Then we wake up this morning and find out that we raided the Iranian consulate in the Kurdish north of Iraq.

Make no mistake, the drums of war are beating softly right now but they are picking up the pace as time goes by. In todays Senate hearing with Condi Rice, Joe Biden warned, practically out of nowhere, that the Bush administration has NO authority to attack Iran without their consent, which would lead to a "constitutional crisis" here in the United States.

The writing is on the wall. Lets just hope we can stop it before it goes any further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. You're not going to get it from GE's mouthpieces ...
Maybe CBS, CNN or some other news organization will report on it, but I doubt Russert or Williams (especially!) are going to leak anything that might hurt their big bad defense contractor boss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. I watched the re-run of that segment early this morning, and what concerned me was....
Brian Williams awkwardly referred to Bush giving them a tour of the world, his thoughts and plans about matters all around the world.

This was kind of odd, the way he described it, and then he did not characterize what Bush said about any of these countries in any way. Would that not be the logical next step in giving viewers answers to the obvious questions they might ask?

Neither Williams nor Russert were 'open' in their comments. They did not add a lot. And go back and listen to what they said about what they learned from Bush -- not much.

There is definitely some kind of 'embedded-type' disclosure they were given, which they cannot reveal. How important it might have been, no one knows but them and Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Which world? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Now this "embedded" information is to be kept secret, so if
any of these reporters get the same info from another source, Chimp has pre-empted them from disclosing it. Smart move for an idiot.

He has essentially guaranteed the secrecy by disclosing the info himself.

Scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yes, they were picking words VERY CAREFULLY.
last night watching them I thought that either we are getting ready to blow the fuck out of the whole middle east or else Bush scared the hell out of them by being total freaking loony tunes. -- well, I guess that's really the SAME thing isn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm sure he just fed them more bullshit and they ate it up.
Whoo......Whooo it makes them feel important and special, like they are in on something, and now they will keep their mouths shut about what a loon he is.
Just more bush marketing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. bush was probably sitting with a bottle of "Jack"!
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 03:17 PM by bluedog
and totally smashed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluewave Donating Member (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. I watched it on tape. It will be leaked soon anyway if it's anything.
No way a panel of reporters keeps this secret any better than "top secret" Pentagon info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. They learned that Bush thinks it's all one big terrorist salad
and he thinks he's Ceasar.

They probably also learned about the storming of the Iranian Embassy in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. Actually they said quite a lot. They said they could "report" but not "quote".
They said Bush was not apologetic and defended removing Sadamn.They said Bush's world view was Sadamn would have joined with Irans, and were clear noone agreed with him. They also said Bush said history would prove him correct "even if Iraq implodes from the center out".They stated Iran was talked about frequently and indicated that an attack on Iran was supported by Bush. They seemed very troubled by all they heard.Matthews implied from what they were saying that Bush was "nuts".Brian Williams seemed to agree silently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. it was prefaced with.... if yawl knew what i knew before we went into iraq
you would understand why we had to do it and the conclusion..... 50 years down the road it will e said that ole bush was right....

so i am thinking bush fed the reporters all his terra terra terra fear convincing these people the world is something to fear and we had better attack all.... lets see if they talk about bush like he is wacko, or if they start supporting and backing him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
17. Russet TaterHead and Williams Looked SCARED to me
seriously, as I watched them, they appeared to me like they'd looked into the maws of Hell itself.

An end of the world feel to what they were saying, but most of all, it looked like they thought Bush was seriously DERANGED and were wondering if perhaps it might be worth it to OUT the GUY as being a NUTCASE and a danger to all of mankind.

I've never seen these two looking like they were ready to flood their Depends. Their fucking HAIR was almost literally standing up as they talked.

Anyone else get that vibe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC