Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What happens if we pull-out of Iraq?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Kiouni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:14 PM
Original message
What happens if we pull-out of Iraq?
I have been torn on this decision for a while. I don't support a surge of troops because it obviously hasn't worked in the past. I understand when the Army leaders say that if we have an immediate pull-out, Iran and Turkey cannot curb the anarchy that will ensue. I understand that currently we are doing little to no good there, but I don't know if an immediate pull-out would be the best thing for the Iraqi civilians.

The best idea I have heard so far to fix this mess has come from the war commission which recommended upping the funding for the iraqi security forces. Combine this with increased funding for infrastructure and I can see the U.S. withdrawing all of our troops within 6 months.

I think the U.S. is bringing in too many outside contractors to re-build Iraq. They obviously have the capability to build things, because we blew up a shit-ton of it. So why not pay them to fix it instead of bringing in foreign companies at 100 times the price to build a children's hospital that will never be finished. I can't imagine that the insurgents want to completely destroy their own land, they just don't want to see America's war profiteers getting fat off it.

I'm hoping someone can explain to me a plan for withdrawl that doesn't include the total destruction of the Iraqi people.... or are we too late?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. What happened when we pulled out of Vietnam?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kiouni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well,.... it didn't go so well.
"Chaos, unrest, and panic ensued as hysterical South Vietnamese officials and civilians scrambled to leave Saigon before it was too late. "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_war#Total_U.S._withdrawal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Right.
Things were peachy before we left, weren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USA_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yes it did ...
... today Vietnam is a capitalist country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. So by that logic, after the deaths of millions after the collapse of Iraq...
you will be able to say "I told you so" when Walmarts ,Nike factories, and Apple Computer stores carpet the cities of the region of 2050 that will exist, amid radiactive waste, radioactive oil, and sitting in your comfy chair in a country that China owns, and pays your meager salary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fairfaxvadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. I doubt there is an "if" anymore. Just "when."
Or, we resign ourselves to stay for 10 years and put ALOT more US troops (troops we presently don't have) on the ground. It would take that kind of commitment to make sure Iraq is as stable as it needs to be for us to say "good job."

Short of that, I think we're just postponing a result we won't like. If it doesn't devolve into total chaos, it certainly won't be the shining beacon of democracy Bush intended.

I wonder if he has any idea yet that he just played right into Iran's hands with this invasion. Iraq's Sunni neighbors have got to be having heart attacks every single day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. We're too late
The time for all of these great ideas was four years ago. Too many of the bad guys have armed themselves in Iraq now, they all want their piece of the pie, and there isn't anything to stop them fighting over it. Our presence there is like putting a bunch of cops in the middle of a gang war in L.A. -- we're just providing extra targets.

Bush** has betrayed the Iraqi people, those like you and me who just want normal peaceful lives. I honestly can't think of a way to ensure they get that now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. murtha over the horizon. pull the troops to protect the border
out of baghdad and let the iraqi's go at it. keep troops to control borders and the areas that are in good shape and keep iran and syria out. then go from there on pulling the troops out. i finally heard what the murtha plan repositioning was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kiouni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. that's sadly a realistic approach
a very sad solution if you think about it because honestly that may be all we can do: try to contain the chaos.

I wish i was a religions person so i could get some solace out of the chimp burning in hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. i am a spiritualist so i have solace... but it is not that bush is going to hell
cause i am not religious and that is part of religion.

ya... i think it is doable and will allow the withdrawal in a more orderly fashion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. pigs fly over a frozen-over hell...
at least while the current idiot is still sitting in the "big chair".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Richard A. Clark former Counter-terrorism Chief ........
author of "Against All Enemies" .... gave a speech a few days ago, Q&A session on just what your asking. He covers it in this 50 minute video. Here's a link to that video, was really informative. Hope this helps. Peace.

link: http://www.americanprogress.org/events/2007/01/after_iraq.html

note: the actual video link is on the page under 'Resources' ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kiouni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. thanks
i couldn't get the video to come up but I'll try back later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. There are plenty of Muslim nations who can provide security...
...instead of our troops. It's still our mess, and we're still responsible for cleaning it up, but we need to do it without an American presence in Iraq, which is do-able. Our presence is doing nothing but making things worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. That's a fantasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Not at all. You're in denial or misinformed. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. U.S. troops lives will be spared.
The U.S. will save billions of dollars.

Maybe people will start to like us again after we start leaving countries alone and let them decided what is best for their country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. Maybe it really does in the final analysis come down to money
These are just some offhanded ideas I've pondered regarding the Iraq
debacle. Maybe none of them are feasible, or some of them could be,
I don't pretend to have the answers but what has been done so far sure as hell isn't working.

A (UN?) resolution/decision? placing all of Iraq's oil reserves and infrastructure into an international 'trust' administered and managed by NATO with a guarantee that the net proceeds of sales are returned equitably to
ALL Iraqis. Doesn't Alaska have some kind of similar arrangment? Let their oil be produced and sold on the open market. There's enough to make everyone in their country comfortable. Sure, the 'peak oil' scenario isn't going away but
why not make use of it until alternatives are developed? Financial security is a pretty damn strong incentive to make nice and could mitigate some of the sectarian mess.

Provide UN/NATO forces to protect the facilities while they are repaired and reconstituted. Find the funds to hire IRAQIS to fix all the stuff we broke...instead of bringing in foreigners to do it. This might require redeployment of significant numbers of U.S. and "coalition of the willing" (are there any left?) troops from Baghdad/Anbar and let the 'civil war' go on as it's doing anyway. How much worse could it really be?

Meanwhile we offer very attractive prices for weapons to the "insurgents"...I don't know how much but for what it's costing us every day we could purchase a hell of a lot of Kalashkanovs, AK47s, RPGs and whatever other stuff they're using to kill our soldiers and each other. I think similar programs have even been used here in the USA with some success.
In any case, whatever we can get and destroy diminishes the risk to our troops.









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. There you go again Karl
Offering a realistic solution to a difficult problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Just trying to make the pie higher...
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Excellent!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well, we won't have to kill or be killed anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC