Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Military scraps call-up limits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 11:22 AM
Original message
Military scraps call-up limits
Edited on Fri Jan-12-07 11:22 AM by helderheid
Utah Guard members told their total active duty may exceed 2 years

By Matthew D. LaPlante
The Salt Lake Tribune
Salt Lake Tribune

Article Last Updated:01/12/2007 09:17:01 AM MST

Hundreds of soldiers, including some Utahns, will have their tours of duty in Iraq extended to support an increase in troop strength announced by President Bush on Wednesday.


Meanwhile, new rules aimed at ensuring the military has enough troops to meet its obligations in Iraq and beyond mean U.S. reservists may no longer count on five years between combat tours, Utah's top soldier said Thursday.


"The clock has been reset, folks," said Brian Tarbet, adjutant general of the Utah National Guard. "All soldiers are available again today. All of them."


That includes soldiers from units, such as the 115th Maintenance Company, that have recently returned home from Iraq.


"I kind of figured it was going to happen - they're not going to start drafting people," said Troy Steen, who returned from Iraq with the 115th less than a year ago.


Steen said he would be willing to do another tour - it would be his third since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks - although he is hoping to keep close to home for a while, having recently been married.


More than 80 percent of current Utah Guard members have deployed since the 2001 attacks, according to state Guard officials. Pentagon rules limiting how long reservists may be called into active duty had, until this week's policy change, left many of those ineligible to redeploy to war.


The changes appear to have been prompted by Bush's decision to increase troops in Iraq and concerns about the ability of the active-duty Army to sustain its current pace of deployments.


Currently, many active-duty soldiers have been serving in Iraq on a one-year-in, one-year-out cycle.


An internal Army document obtained by The Associated Press on Thursday said that without more frequent use of Guard and Reserve forces through remobilization of units that already have served in Iraq, "we will break" the active-duty Army.


Other changes in the Guard and Reserve policy, according to defense officials, include:

* To allow for more cohesion among Guard and Reserve units sent into combat, they will be deployed as whole units, rather than as partial units or as individuals plugged into a unit they do not normally train with.
* Extra pay will be provided for Guard and Reserve troops who are required to mobilize more than once in six years.


Tarbet stressed the Utah Guard would strive for fairness in how it sent its citizen soldiers back to war, first mobilizing units
and soldiers that have been home the longest. He specifically noted the 1457th Engineer Battalion as one of the units that, having deployed to Iraq in the first year of the war, might be considered soonest for redeployment.

More

http://www.sltrib.com/ci_4998533
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. With a policy like that, it's will be more difficult to sell The Guard
to prospective recruits. People want to know when they are finished so they can make plans like employment, marriage, children, . . . and not being in a war theatre until their number is up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. precisely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC