Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FITZ vs CHENEY-MURRAY WAAS-EXCLUSIVE- CIA Leak Probe: Inside The Grand Jury

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 06:04 PM
Original message
FITZ vs CHENEY-MURRAY WAAS-EXCLUSIVE- CIA Leak Probe: Inside The Grand Jury
Edited on Fri Jan-12-07 06:32 PM by kpete
ONLINE EXCLUSIVE
CIA Leak Probe: Inside The Grand Jury
By Murray Waas, National Journal

© National Journal Group Inc.
Friday, Jan. 12, 2007

On the flight back to Washington, Cheney huddled with two of his top aides -- I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, his then-chief of staff, and Catherine Martin, then assistant to the vice president for pubic affairs. According to federal court records, the three discussed how to counter and discredit the allegations made by a former U.S. ambassador, Joseph C. Wilson IV, that the Bush administration had manipulated and distorted intelligence information to make the case to go to war with Iraq.

...............

The extraordinary amount of time and energy that Cheney personally devoted to the issue, as well as his intensity of emotion regarding it is underscored by this exchange between a federal prosecutor and Libby when Libby testified before the grand jury:

"Was it a topic that was discussed on a daily basis?" a federal prosecutor asked.

"Yes, sir," answered Libby.

"And it was discussed on multiple occasions each day in fact?"

"Yes, sir."

"And during that time did the vice president indicate that he was upset that this article was out there which falsely in his view attacked his own credibility?"

"Yes, sir."

...........

more at:
http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0112nj1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kicksies
Murray Waas rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Thanks, kpete for posting..
good news abounds!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Will this case ever come to a productive finish?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exlrrp Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
38. Don't hear much about Fitzmas any more, do we?
In 3 plus years of investigation, Fitzgerald has managed to indict one 2d tier Bush aide, actually a Cheney aide. Conviction is only about a 50-50 shot with a real certainty of a Last day Pardon.
This turns out to have been the biggest waste of time of any investigation of any in recent memory, or at least in terms of impact.
Glad I didn't rename my holidays after him like many did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. LOL!!! Really?
It was nothing short of absolutely necessary.

This investigation was crucial to putting these assholes in check. The crime was nothing short of treason, and even though he may not be able to prove that, he brought the cabal to the realization that they were not invulnerable.

They put our national security at risk, compromised our intelligence, and put the lives of many NOC operatives in jeopardy.

Are you saying that there should not have been an investigation?

-Because that's what it sounds like.

Oh, and here's something to chew on;




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. What would you know about the price of fish and chips!
Not very smart to jump the gun like that. Time will tell, and you could end up deeply humiliated for your arrogant presumption.

Has it not occurred to you that it would have taken Fitzgerald 3 plus years, precisely because he is thorough, and won't go to battle as ill-equipped as the US and British troops in Iraq? No... of course, not. Why would it have occurred to you, with your tagline that might have been written for you by the NRA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow, you gotta read the whole article - great timeline of the Cheney-Plame affair
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. I'm not able to open the article because my computer is
saying that a new pop up blocker is preventing it from opening. I had one opportunity to accept the pop ups but I declined. So now I can't read the article. Google updated my tool bar with this new feature. But I have been following this story, and I'm always happy to see any thing about this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. You might try
a different browser.

Firefox is a good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. If you have the patience of a saint and want to explain that
little bit of info. on changing browsers , I can look into it. Sorry I'm slow to the table with all this tech talk. Please excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. No problem
Go to this site and click on 'Download Firefox free' -

http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/

Once you install it on your computer, there will be a shortcut key on your desktop.

Continue to connect to your Internet provider like you normally do but once your online just open up Firefox and you're good to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. fantastic article...
It's a great Primer for folks who don't know a lot about the "Plame Affair" so to speak. The Waas-man has just got a sense of how to tie things together.

K&R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Up to his eyeballs in high crimes.
Cheney should be in a lot of hot water. Should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. What's the new info in there?
Edited on Fri Jan-12-07 07:03 PM by leveymg
Haven't had a chance to read it, but will. Can someone tell us? Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. A wee peek
at the prosecutor's strategy.

You'll enjoy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. It may be easier to count how many members of this administration don't qualify for impeachment. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Something To Consider
"The vice president had apparently first learned in June 2003, according to the indictment, that Wilson's wife was a CIA officer"

The work-up on Wilson had been ordered by Cheney approx. 3 months earlier in, March 2003. The veep is not a patient man and I don't think he waited months for the info he was seeking. All he had to do was walk over to the CIA, which he did frequently. This doesn't change what happened later, but it adds to the premeditative value of what was going on for I think Cheney had the info sooner than most think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
24. He seems pretty obsessed
with Plame.

He'd probably knew exactly who she was before her husband started causing trouble. She may have even briefed him at one time or another.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. Hadn't Considered The Briefing Angle
Interesting. But I'd bet dollar to doughnuts that he's known Wilson from way back even though he claimed not to know him. They were both old state department hands and who in the government didn't know about Wilson's handling of Sadaam during Gulf I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Cheney was SecDef during Desert Storm and Wilson was the acting ambassador in Baghdad
basically the last man in Iraq before we invaded. What are the chances that the SecDef didn't get a briefing on Wilson's findings during the lead up to the invasion? Poppy and his war council got plenty of inside info from Amb Wilson during that time, Dick couldn't have possibly not known who Joe Wilson was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
49. "Either the first or second person to tell him that Plame was a CIA officer"
Or to put it crudely, the real question is, "Which Dick?"


The reason was that Libby's failure to mention the March 2002 debriefing was one more piece of an ever increasing body of circumstantial evidence that led prosecutors to believe that Libby had devised a cover story to protect himself, and perhaps even the Vice President, to conceal the fact that his agenda was to leak information about Plame from the very start.

During one of his initial interviews with the FBI, Libby was shown copies of his own notes showing that as early as June 11 or June 12, 2003, Vice President Cheney was either the first or second person to tell him that Plame was a CIA officer and might have also played a role in sending her husband to Niger. At the time, Wilson had not yet written his New York Times op-ed or put a public face to his allegations, but press reports had already aired Wilson's account of his trip to Niger without naming him.


Waas really illuminates why and how the prosecution will really be going after Cheney. As a friend of ours is fond of saying, things are good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #49
59. Ostensibly they'll be going after Libby for perjury.
It's the REASON for the perjury that will come out and that will point to Cheney. It's inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. Cheney is the puppet master pulling the strings
Fitzgerald is going to expose that Hopefully if not others will
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. Little details coming into focus.
What Miller herself did not know during her grand jury testimony was that a key issue for federal investigators was whether she would testify as to whether Libby had attempted to leak her anything about the CIA debriefing report of Wilson after his Niger trip. Prosecutors believed that Miller was perhaps attempting to protect Libby in her testimony.

/snip/

Prosecutors did not want to tip Miller as to why it was so crucial to them to learn whether Libby had ever mentioned the March 2002 Wilson debriefing report to her or Cooper shortly after he disembarked Air Force Two.

The reason was that Libby's failure to mention the March 2002 debriefing was one more piece of an ever increasing body of circumstantial evidence that led prosecutors to believe that Libby had devised a cover story to protect himself, and perhaps even the Vice President, to conceal the fact that his agenda was to leak information about Plame from the very start.



And a rare look into what was on the prosecutors' minds:


While questioning Libby during grand jury testimony, prosecutors were incredulous regarding Libby's claims that he and Cheney had not discussed Plame's CIA employment during the critical July 6 to July 14 period. They also expressed skepticism that Libby had supposedly forgotten -- even though Libby's own written notes indicated otherwise -- that Cheney had told him that Plame worked for the CIA much earlier, on either June 11 or June 12. They were also disbelieving of Libby's claims that even though Libby and Cheney met several times every day after Wilson's July 6 column appeared, the two men did not discuss Plame during the subsequent eight days, not until Novak's column appeared. And finally, prosecutors were disbelieving when Libby claimed that he was simply passing on a rumor to Cheney that he had purportedly learned from Tim Russert that Plame was a CIA officer.



Let the endgame commence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libby2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Great article....thanks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. So, if I've got this right
Judy's June 8th meeting (the one she forgot), was where Libby told her about the March 2002 CIA briefing/Plame? This is where he actually disclosed the info and leaked the original leak that they can't prove?

Since they were trying to get Judy to roll over on Libby, they must know that this actual leak, and not the First Amendment, is the reason one of the Aspens had to go cool her Jimmy Choo's in the Big House, right?

Murray? :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Looking more and more like Little Miss Run Amuck isn't the only one
looking at a visit to...The Big House!

Fascinating to actually get a look at the strategic thinking of white in this chess game.

Methinks that the Black Queen is in some serious jeopardy, and that the Black King has sacrificed all his pawns, both bishops, and is within just a few moves of checkmate.

More than we had hoped for, even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Knight jumps queen!
Bishop jumps queen! Pawns jump queen! Gangbang!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. .
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
51. "You Look Like the Piss Boy!"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. Thanks for posting kpete! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
19. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Funny---but not one word about Rove...
Edited on Sat Jan-13-07 07:53 AM by trumad
You'd think if he was indicted that Waas would have mentioned it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. Rove made a deal
to save his own ass.

That doesn't mean that Rove and Dimson are in the clear yet. I bet Fitzgerald has at least a couple of more aces up his sleeve.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Why didn't Waas mention that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Because the focus is directly on Cheney
It seems Fitzgerald has proof that both Libby and Cheney lied to the Grand Jury.

The focus at this point is on the office of the VP, not the office of the President. Rove did not play a primary role in outing Valerie Plame.

Apparently, Cheney, Libby and Cathie Martin (who the heck is she?) were the key conspirators.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. Spokeswoman For Cheney
She was on that infamous AF2 ride with Libby & Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #30
45. Thanks Me., seems Ms Cathie is in this up to her ears
Edited on Sat Jan-13-07 04:44 PM by DoYouEverWonder
Then there is Sy Hersh's Stovepiping article in the New Yorker:

“The Vice-President saw a piece of intelligence reporting that Niger was attempting to buy uranium,” Cathie Martin, the spokeswoman for Cheney, told me. Sometime after he first saw it, Cheney brought it up at his regularly scheduled daily briefing from the C.I.A., Martin said. “He asked the briefer a question. The briefer came back a day or two later and said, ‘We do have a report, but there’s a lack of details.’ ” The Vice-President was further told that it was known that Iraq had acquired uranium ore from Niger in the early nineteen-eighties but that that material had been placed in secure storage by the I.A.E.A., which was monitoring it. “End of story,” Martin added. “That’s all we know.” According to a former high-level C.I.A. official, however, Cheney was dissatisfied with the initial response, and asked the agency to review the matter once again. It was the beginning of what turned out to be a year-long tug-of-war between the C.I.A. and the Vice-President’s office.

Hersh moves on to Wilson's trip:

....Wilson returned to Washington and made his report. It was circulated, he said, but “I heard nothing about what the Vice-President’s office thought about it.” (In response, Cathie Martin said, “The Vice-President doesn’t know Joe Wilson and did not know about his trip until he read about it in the press.” The first press accounts appeared fifteen months after Wilson’s trip.)

This June 11, 2003 UPI article states that the report of Wilson's trip did make it to the White House - and that Cheney decided to ignore the findings.

(Meant to reply to post #36)

http://www.talkleft.com/story/2005/10/30/417/38297




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
39. Rove uses stealth and layers of insulation-that's a common criminal
strategy. The BFEE is full of evil and totally corrupted superior range criminals like him.

So let's analyze some of our open-source history together looking at Rove's failed "cloak of invisibility" in the area of crimes-including the exposure of a NOC CIA agent (and that agent's networks and assets) for political reasons.

The White House Iraq Group/WHIG was formed by Andy Card in 2002-yet Mr. Rove's "fingerprints" (as well as Mr. Cheney's, Mr. Libby's et al) are all over that operation. WHIG used perception management to "convince" the world of the "reasons" for US military action against Iraq, even though the reasons were lies (later cited as "an intelligence failure"-another big lie).

Another function of WHIG, and this is where Mr. Rove's role needs scrutiny, was to thwart and silence any opposition to the agenda of regime change in Iraq. Valerie Plame Wilson was part of that.

The Democratic Party has a good timeline on WHIG.
http://www.democrats.org/a/2005/10/timeline_activi.php

Maybe someone else can offer more on Mr. Rove in regards to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #39
56. Honestly, it doesn't seen
like Rove was very involved at all. Rove is Bush's guy, not Cheney's. From the testimony, this obsession w/hurting Wilson was totally coming from the VP's office. It sounds like Rove just jumped on the bandwagon later & starting spreading rumors as part of his normal asshole MO. Cheney is Fitzgerald's ultimate target here - though it doesn't look like he'll actually suceed in indicting him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
29. Should they have said large numbers?
Edited on Sat Jan-13-07 08:46 AM by malaise
"Americans had no idea that the war in Iraq, then not even four months old, would take a turn for the worse, that more than 3,000 American servicemen would die in the line of duty; that "liberated" Iraq would spiral down into sectarian violence; and that the war would not only divide the Iraqi nation but the American one as well."

I knew and so did thousands of others.

Great article otherwise.

Add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
33. Tres Interesting! k(pete)nr! ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
34. Fascinating. A MUST READ!
The part near the end where Libby is tap-dancing in the grand jury under Fitzgerald's questioning is awesome!

Like a bug on a pin!

I can't wait until Cheney testifies. The old bionic heart will get a work-out that day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
35. Looking forward to the grilling
that will start on Tuesday... :bounce:

Go Fitzgerald Go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. You Might Have To Wait A Bit Longer For The BBQ
I believe jury selection starts on Tues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. Works for me - I was going
to have cable installed prior to the 16th. Jury selection gives a little more time to get ready and popcorn popped.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seesdifferent Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
42. Niger suing US over Bush's 16 words in 2003 SOTUS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
46. Kicked for time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
47. K&R(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
48. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. Today Cheney characterized Libby as one of the most "honest"
people he knows.

"Truth lies dead in the streets..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. Consider the frame of reference we're dealing with.
In Cheney-speak that probably means Libby has never killed anyone with his bare hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. In context, Patsy Stone, entire networks were exposed worldwide
and set events into motion that have escalated since.

It is reasonable to state that while as Libby et al didn't kill with his "bare hands" a lot of people came to harm-and the repercussions continue today.

Valerie Plame was most likely involved as a NOC agent running networks involved with nuclear related issues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. I know
and that's why I qualified it with regard to an act Libby has not personally done. Libby, Cheney, none of them, are in the least honest. Of course people were harmed and possibly killed as a result of his actions at his bosses behest. My point was that maybe Cheney wasn't lying when he said this about Libby because he knows people who have done worse things. He could really be one of the most honest men Cheney knows. Frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slowry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
54. Pubic affairs :o n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
57. Kicking it up again.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
58. This is one of the most comprehensive accounts
of the CIA leak investigation so far! Excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC