Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scratch the Slimy Surface of a Congressional Catfight-- Find a Class War!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 06:53 PM
Original message
Scratch the Slimy Surface of a Congressional Catfight-- Find a Class War!
“Madame Secretary, please, I know you feel terrible about it. That's not the point. I was making the case as to who pays the price for your decisions. And the fact that this administration would move forward with this escalation with no clue as to the further price that we're going to pay militarily -- we certainly know the numbers, billions of dollars, that we can't spend here in this country. I find really appalling that there's not even enough time taken to figure out what the casualties would be.” --Senator Barbara Boxer, Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Iraq, January 2007

Oh Look!! Catfight!! Political chicks in the media mud-- a She Said, She Said Capitol Hill Smackdown!! Somebody better apologize!

Why fall for the distraction? Have we become too accustomed to having the punditocracy tell us what was said and not only interpret the actual events, but provide opinions for us to adopt (and argue with each over)? Are we more interested in the mass-produced faux-controversies about what was “suggested,” or “implied,” or said “as if,” than what was actually said? American political discourse reduced to garish, gaudy, foam-at-the-mouth Roller Derby.

Who is owed an apology? WE ARE. We are owed an apology from the faux-pundit, emotional button pushers; we are owed an apology from the zombified public that falls for it time and again.

Former Fox Newsman, White House Spokesmodel Tony Snow told Fox News,

"I don't know if she was intentionally that tacky, but I do think it's outrageous. Here you've got a professional woman, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and Barbara Boxer is sort of throwing little jabs because Condi doesn't have children, as if that means that she doesn't understand the concerns of parents. Great leap backward for feminism."

Former Gingrich staffer and Reagan speechwriter Tony Blankley, in a near apoplectic fit on The McLaughlin Group claimed that Eleanor Clift misrepresented what Senator Boxer had said, when it was Blankley that was completely misrepresenting the Senator’s statement and intentions. He also mentioned that Ms. Rice was a “black woman.”

So, rather than address the issue the Senator raised or what her actual statement was, the corporate media vultures immediately start screeching about some perceived insult, using a “leap backward for feminism” gimmick and “playing the race card” themselves, while pretending that race or gender had anything to do with the fact that WHAT BARBARA BOXER SAID WAS RELEVANT, TRUE AND THE POINT NEEDED TO BE MADE. And why do they do this, why do they throw out red herrings for the salivating audience to play tug of war over? Because it’s all they’ve got. They can’t win on the issues so they have to make sure they keep the public talking about-- nothing.

If we don’t fall for these weapons of mass distraction we might think about the cost of this war, about who is paying the cost and who is raking in the profit. We might think about the reasons that this war was started. We might think about the underlying -- unspoken -- meaning of Congressman Rangel’s legislation for a draft and Senator Boxer’s questions about how much more blood will be spilled for a lie. This administration and this war have taken the blood and treasure of the American people and transferred it to this President’s “base,” the MegaRich and the corporations.

Scratch the slimy surface of a Congressional catfight-- find a class war.

*****************


SENATOR BARBARA BOXER:
“The Military Times published a poll which found that only 35 percent of military members approved of the way President Bush is handling this war, and only 38 percent thought there should be more troops. So from where I sit, Madame Secretary, you are not listening to the American people. You are not listening to the military. You are not listening to the bipartisan voices from the Senate. You are not listening to the Iraq Study Group. Only you know who you are listening to, and you wonder why there is a dark cloud of skepticism and pessimism over this nation. I think people are right to be skeptical after listening to some of the things that have been said by your administration.”

<snip>

SENATOR BARBARA BOXER:
“Now, the issue is who pays the price, who pays the price? I'm not going to pay a personal price. My kids are too old, and my grandchild is too young. You're not going to pay a particular price, as I understand it, within immediate family. So who pays the price? The American military and their families, and I just want to bring us back to that fact.”

“SO WHO PAYS THE PRICE? THE AMERICAN MILITARY AND THEIR FAMILIES, AND I JUST WANT TO BRING US BACK TO THAT FACT.”

“NPR has done a series of interviews with families who have lost kids. And the announcer said to one family in the Midwest, "What's changed in your life since your son's death?" The answer comes back, "Everything. You can't begin to imagine how even the little things change, how you go through the day, how you celebrate Christmas, how you celebrate any holiday or birthday. There's an absence. It's not like the person has never been there. They always were there, and now they're not. And you're looking at an empty hole. He has a Purple Heart, the flag that was on his coffin, and one of the two urns that we got back." He came back in three parts: two urns and one coffin. He's buried in three places, if you count their house. He's buried in New Jersey. He's buried in Cleveland.

“That's who is going to pay the price.”

"And then you have the most moving thing I've ever heard on a radio station, which is a visit to a burn unit and a talk with the nurse. Devon suffered burns over 93 percent of his body, three amputations: both legs, one arm. His back was broken, internal organs exposed. As the hospital staff entered the room, they would see photographs on the wall, pictures of a healthy private standing proud in his dark-green Army dress uniform.

“ "It's very important," says the major, "that nurses see the patient as a person, because the majority of our patients have facial burns, and they're unrecognizable, and they're extremely disfigured."

“So who pays the price? Not me. Not you. These are the people who pay the price.”









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is what the right wing jackoffs are left with. The majority of the U.S. is
turning against the war in Iraq, so they have to turn debates about serious issues into bush league crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. yup. right wing jackals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. link to "War Is A Racket"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puebloknot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Swiftboat Barbara Boxer??? I think not.
"So who pays the price?"

It's a question for the ages, and it damned sure deserves an intelligent answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. "WAR is a racket. It always has been."
WAR IS A RACKET

WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.

A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small "inside" group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.
In the World War (I) a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows.

How many of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle? How many of them dug a trench? How many of them knew what it meant to go hungry in a rat-infested dug-out? How many of them spent sleepless, frightened nights, ducking shells and shrapnel and machine gun bullets? How many of them parried a bayonet thrust of an enemy? How many of them were wounded or killed in battle?

Out of war nations acquire additional territory, if they are victorious. They just take it. This newly acquired territory promptly is exploited by the few – the selfsame few who wrung dollars out of blood in the war. The general public shoulders the bill.

And what is this bill?

This bill renders a horrible accounting. Newly placed gravestones. Mangled bodies. Shattered minds. Broken hearts and homes. Economic instability. Depression and all its attendant miseries. Back-breaking taxation for generations and generations.

<more in link above>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. So, how many times will people fall for this twist-smear-and-divert tactic
before they wise up and just say, "yeah right, now tell me about how we're going to resolve the war in Iraq"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. It's easier to slip into readymade (phony) arguments than ask the tough (simple) questions
Edited on Sun Jan-14-07 12:55 AM by omega minimo
Folks love their convenience :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. If threads on the faux "controversy" thrive and threads on actual issues sink like stones
what point is there on posting on the issues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. KO Follow The Money question-- did someone say Class War?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. Aw, I can't recommend it any more...
...but I can kick it. Anyone who denies the class war raging today must be blind or enjoying the luxury of being isolated from the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. "Only you know who you are listening to, and you wonder why there is a dark cloud of skepticism..."

Boxer pointing out Condi isn't listening to any of the parties she's accountable to:

"Only you know who you are listening to, and you wonder why there is a dark cloud of skepticism and pessimism over this nation. I think people are right to be skeptical after listening to some of the things that have been said by your administration.”

I don't know who they are but their initials are $.$.


Hey P, nice to see you. :hi:
Is it impeachment yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I don't know, but it seems like it's been cooking long enough...
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. get that table ready!
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. If that will move things along faster, I'll start folding napkins. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC