Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DKOS: New Mexico Legislature to get impeachment bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:42 AM
Original message
DKOS: New Mexico Legislature to get impeachment bill
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/1/12/14726/1248

>>>snip
A JOINT RESOLUTION

PETITIONING CONGRESS TO COMMENCE THE INVESTIGATION OF AND IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH AND VICE PRESIDENT RICHARD B. CHENEY.

WHEREAS, George W. Bush and Richard B. Cheney conspired with others to defraud the United States of America by intentionally misleading congress and the public regarding the threat from Iraq in order to justify a war in violation of Title 18 United States Code, Section 371; and

WHEREAS, George W. Bush has admitted to ordering the national security agency to conduct electronic surveillance of American civilians without seeking warrants from the foreign intelligence surveillance court of review, duly constituted by congress in 1978, in violation of Title 50 United States Code, Section 1805; and

WHEREAS, George W. Bush and Richard B. Cheney conspired to commit the torture of prisoners in violation of Title 18 United States Code, Chapter 113C, the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the Geneva Conventions, which under Article VI of the United States constitution are part of the "supreme Law of the Land"; and

WHEREAS, George W. Bush and Richard B. Cheney acted to strip American citizens of their constitutional rights by ordering indefinite detention without access to legal counsel, without charge and without the opportunity to appear before a civil judicial officer to challenge the detention, based solely on the discretionary designation by the president of a United States citizen as an "enemy combatant", all in subversion of
law; and
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BigNeeravT Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for that great news!
Kicked and recommended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tecelote Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Makes me proud!
Edited on Tue Jan-16-07 11:49 AM by tecelote
I like the no-nonsense language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Me too, finally proud to be from NM
however, no mention from the media here about this. I guess that's to be expected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Do you know its chances for passage? Good? Bad?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I saw where Warpy said in another thread
that it wasn't good...but hey...it's out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Why? I thought there were Dems in both houses + a Dem Gov.?? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. This will determine whether this is just another dashed hope
that the constitution will be defended or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. 4 other states have similar introduced resolutions
To my knowledge none have made it to a vote.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. I heart New Mexico. Connecticut could learn something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hooray for my state!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. We all ought to contact the New Mexico Legislature
Edited on Tue Jan-16-07 12:05 PM by mmonk
in support of this petition. In case you don't know it or realize it, you should be desperate. Somebody needs to feel that desperation and take heed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good news!
How refreshing to see real courage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. k&r
Hooray for my peeps in NM! :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thank you, New Mexico. May history show your patriotism. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC