Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Honduras temporarily grabs Exxon, Chevron terminals

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:57 PM
Original message
Honduras temporarily grabs Exxon, Chevron terminals

http://www.boston.com/news/world/latinamerica/articles/2007/01/14/honduras_temporarily_grabs_exxon_chevron_terminals/


Honduras will take temporary control of foreign-owned oil storage terminals as part of a government import program meant to drive down fuel prices, President Manuel Zelaya said late on Saturday.

Zelaya ordered the move after failing to reach a deal with big oil companies Exxon Mobil <XOM.N> and Chevron <CVX.N>, as well as local company DIPPSA, to rent the terminals.

"It is not a nationalization, it's a temporary use of the storage tanks through a lease and payment of a reasonable price," he said.

Honduras produces no crude of its own and no longer has a refinery. Its fuel market, like that of most Central American countries, is dominated by Shell <RDSa.L>, Exxon Mobil and Chevron.

-snip-

A congressional commission set up to study the new system has said it could save Honduras -- one of the poorest countries in the Western Hemisphere -- about $66 million a year.
-snip-
-------------------------------


more power to them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. And governments do things in a temporary manner

temporary? Right? This is out and out theft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. as if the oil company barons are not thieves
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. If they're paying fair compensation, I'd call it National Security.
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 01:13 PM by TahitiNut
Since when is having a foreign corporation in total control of a nation's most critical import a 'reasonable' policy? Since entitlements (contracts and title to property) exist solely through the enforcement of the state, it seems there's some balance that might be achieved in regarding the prudent actions of the state in defending national (people, after all) interests.

The history of U.S. military intevention in the affairs of Latin American countries, ALWAYS on the side of corporate interests and against liberal interests in those countries, goes back over a century.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC