Tinksrival
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-18-07 08:52 AM
Original message |
CNBC SquackBox: Which Dem candidate is worse for wall street |
|
Coming up after the break.........I have to catch a train.....Can someone watch? now
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-18-07 08:55 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Historically, the stock market does better under dems. It's just short sighted executives looking for quick profits they can pocket that think otherwise.
|
lapfog_1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-18-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message |
2. The only intelligent life found on SquawkBox |
|
was Mark Haines and, occasionally, David Faber. All the rest (especially Joe Kernen) have got IQ's down in the near Bush range.
Dems have been traditionally very good for Wall Street. And, for some reason, they hate that.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:44 PM
Response to Original message |