dsc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 08:59 PM
Original message |
Do the people of the US deserve freedom? |
|
The Bush wiretapping contraversy isn't a close call. It isn't a case of maybe. A President who has consistently lied about national security (lies about WMD, lies about the cost of the war, lies about our reception in Iraq, lies about oil paying for it, lying about nukes, and on and on) says trust me to warrentlessly spy upon people in the US. This should be a 70 30 proposition. Yet in poll after poll it comes out around 50/50. Franklin was right about the idea that trading safety for liberty makes one unworthy of both.
This should be a no brainer. After all even Bob Barr gets it.
|
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Stupid Question, If It Wasn't Just Rhetorical. |
|
As far as the 50/50 split, that's only because there has yet to be any real consistent message given to the american people that the same outcome of tracking the terrorists could've occurred within the law.
As long as the main theme pointed at americans is that it went above the law a little but only for the sake of protecting them, and the message of "that's what I'm supposed to do as president right?" exists, don't expect the split to be better than 50/50.
|
dsc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. maybe a bit rhetorical but not entirely |
|
Frankly this isn't a close call. Bush constantly lies. Yet on the basis of trust me, people are swooning to support blatent illegal behavior. It is hard to see how our people are deserving of freedom on the basis of Franklin's test.
|
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Well Then I Think It's A Stupid Question, No Offense. And I Still Say The |
|
main reasons for their approval is due to what I posted originally, which you didn't comment on.
|
dsc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. Any sentient being knows Bush lied about Iraq |
|
No matter how much we want to blame the media here the public has often behaved this way. Look at our behavior in regards to sex offenders. Sorry, but we have to admit that people have become more than complacent about freedom.
|
Journeyman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. Check back 10, 50, 100 years or more. . . |
|
and you'll invariably find a sizeable portion of the population which, when asked generalized questions about the Bill of Rights, will consistently oppose these rights -- until asked specifically about them. Just because people are stupid doesn't mean they don't "deserve" what other, more intelligent people have fought to ensure for all.
You need to take a longer, wider view of the world and its varied history. Cut people some slack. What's ascribed to Mr Lincoln, and what Thomas Jefferson firmly believed, still holds true -- give people a level field and all the facts and they'll make reasoned decisions. You can't fool all of them all the time.
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Deserving has very little to do with getting or keeping |
patricia92243
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message |
5. The Republicans have re framed the debate. The word WARRENTLESS has been |
|
left out of the explanation of what has happened. The lack of a warrant is the problem. Most people don't realize that.
If the question was: Do you think it is o.k. for the government to tap people's telephone conversations without a warrant - the answer would be a resounding NO.
|
dsc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
14. Honestly I have no idea if they would care |
|
I would like to think they would but frankly I think they wouldn't.
|
liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Those who give up liberties so easily, do not deserve them |
|
Paraphrased from Ben Franklin.
|
enigma000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 09:27 PM
Response to Original message |
8. As opposed to, what, enslavement? |
|
Perhaps a localized nuclear holocaust on the North American continent. The annihilation of all American cities with a population over half-a-million? The survivors could be sold off to China to pay off the national debt.
I'm just trying to follow your logic here........
|
dsc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
We have, with about half the people's approval, a President who can tap any phone, at any time, without a warrent. What is that called?
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I do. If 50% want to restrict their civil liberties... |
|
I say let them go for it. Just leave mine alone.
|
Rocknrule
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Obviously they want to live under a dictatorship, so no they don't deserve freedom
|
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-11-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Most Americans are willing to sacrifice freedom for "security". |
|
Most Americans have no reason to worry about such notions as "freedom" simply because they seldom choose to exercise it in any meaningful way. As long as they have the "freedom" to shop, watch the superbowl, and be comfortable, they could care less about freedom.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:27 PM
Response to Original message |