LOL! Check out Lou Dobbs poll tonight!

[FormerRepublican]

"Do you believe national security should play a role in the national security review process?"

http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/lou.dobbs.tonight/

This is in response to comments by the Bush Administration (someone at Commerce, I think) who said the issue should not be politicized.

Lou Dobbs is on it tonight!

[LiberalVoice]

1. Now that is a funny poll question! lol nt

[JuniperLea]

2. What the hell is up with those numbers?

[MissB]

3. Wow. Only 8% are drinking the Jim Jones KoolAid tonight.

[laylah]

4. I would love to know

who the 4% dumbasses are and WTF are they thinking :silly:

[napi21]

5. Lou just asked Peter King "How does it feel to have the President tell

you to go to hell?"

HAH! I can't believe I just heard that! King just proceded to answer to question too. Didn't even say, well he didn't do that.

HA HA HA!

[Arugula Latte]

16. Man, when you've lost an tremendous Bush ass-kissing numbnut

like Peter King, you've lost ... your base.

[napi21]

21. He not only lost Peter, he lost Frist, Hastert, Santorum and Graham.

And those are the ones that I've heard about in the last 15 minutes!

Kink also said his office received more calls and emails on this port subject than they ever have in his 15 yers in the Senate!

Cafferty was right on this one! The President is in trouble!!!!!

[Cobalt Violet]

6. 8% no.

Who are these idiots?

[converted_democrat]

7. Done.. 92% yes..& 8% no n/t

[TruthStream_dot_org]

8. Typical...lol

I love his rhetorical polls. I've only seen one in the past few years that was even close to even...its always something like "Chose this and youre smart and choose this and youre a dumb loser". lol

[patricia92243]

9. Voted - yes of course.

[NRaleighLiberal]

10. Sounds kind of like "if you are calling someone, do you have a phone in

your hand". I can feel the national IQ dropping another 10 points...

[in_cog_ni_to]

11. 92% yes no 8%

Do you believe national security should play a role in the national security review process?

Yes 92% 1171 votes

No 8% 97 votes
Total: 1268 votes

[dave502d]

12. Done.

Do you believe national security should play a role in the national security review process?

Yes 92% 1171 votes

No 8% 97 votes
Total: 1268 votes

[Little Star]

13. Done

[txindy]

14. LOL! That's the way to word a poll. No ambiguity there.

:toast:

[Pastiche423]

15. Voted

Do you believe national security should play a role in the national security review process?

Yes 94% 2460 votes

No 6% 149 votes

Total: 2609 votes

[Rainscents]

17. Done!

I had to double check with DU'ers and see which way you guys voted before I'd voted. LOL

[kaygore]

18. Done--down to 6%

[Coventina]

19. Done - No is down to 5%

:-)

[stevietheman]

20. Wow. Maybe Bush really is a uniter, not a divider. Har har. n/t

n/t

[madokie]

22. done 95% yes

[Dave Reynolds]

23. I fail to understand how anyone could vote no on that.

Yet at this time 255 people have.

[merwin]

24. Voted. only 4% (411) Kool Aid drinkers.

[Sydnie]

25. Who are those 413 ignorant people with a computer?

Do you believe national security should play a role in the national security review process?

Yes 96% 9056 votes

No 4% 413 votes
Total: 9469 votes

[Katherine Brengle]

26. Oops--I didn't understand the question and I voted "no" lol...

When I read it, it sounded like they were asking if national security should perform its own oversight, lol...

I think it's almost bedtime...

[leftofthedial]

27. this gives one interesting measure

4% say "No."

Possibility one: whatever the poll subject, throw out about 4 or 5% as just plain stupid or pranksters.

Possibility two: 4% is king george's actual support number.

[izzybeans]

28. Logically there is no way to answer no.

Should idiots play a role in idiotic voting habits?

I'd bet half of that 4% is messing about.

[merwin]

29. But yet 557 people have voted no :-)

[progressivebydesign]

30. Naw. Karl just got tired of clearing his cache over and over. n/t

[wicket]

33. LOL!!!!

:rofl:

[Zookeeper]

31. Done. But, it certainly is an oddly worded question! n/t

[wicket]

32. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

This is great :rofl: