Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Occam's Razor - "The Bush Presidency"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 11:22 AM
Original message
Occam's Razor - "The Bush Presidency"
Edited on Mon Feb-27-06 11:41 AM by rpgamerd00d
From Wikipedia:

Occam's Razor (also spelled Ockham's Razor) is a principle attributed to the 14th-century English logician and Franciscan friar William of Ockham. It forms the basis of methodological reductionism, and is also called the principle of parsimony or law of economy.

In its simplest form, Occam's Razor states that one should make no more assumptions than needed. Put into everyday language, it says
Numquam ponenda est pluritas sine necessitate.

which translates to:
Entities are not to be multiplied without necessity.

or
Multiples should never be used if not necessary.

or
"Shave off" (omit) unnecessary entities in explanations.

But the more commonly used translations are:
Given two equally predictive theories, choose the simpler, and The simplest answer is usually the correct answer.


Election 2000:
a) Did democratic (black) voters get purged totally by coincidence in specific districts around the country, and were there many coincidental cases of voter disenfranchisement across the country, and the governor of FLA just so happen to be Bush's brother, and did the Supreme Court just happen to coincidentally get involved in a way never before done in US History;
or
b) Did the Republicans commit election fraud?

Election 2004:
a) Did democratic (black) voters get purged totally by coincidence in specific districts around the country, and were there many coincidental cases of voter disenfranchisement across the country, and the Sec of State in OH just so happen to be Republican and sequestor the vote tabulation from the public for no reason, and did the owner of Diebold just coincidentally claim to "vow to deliver Ohio to Bush";
or
b) Did the Republicans commit election fraud?

UAE Port Deal:
a) Is there some sinister scheme involving some kind of incriminating evidence on Bush, and does this deal just coincidenally happen to involve a country that was involved with attacking us on 9/11 who coincidentally support the Taliban and the destruction of Israel;
or
b) Bush is doing the deal for cash
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Beautiful!
This analysis can be applied to just about everything in the chimp administration!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Dunno if you're the wikipedia editor on this one,
Edited on Mon Feb-27-06 11:31 AM by electropop
but just a reminder to folks: it's "election fraud" not "voter fraud." Calling it "voter fraud" makes it misleadingly sound as if the fraud was committed by voters rather than against them, as actually happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. No need for Occam's Razor
the exit poll- and disenfranchisement anomolies overwhelmingly being in favor of Bush is simply way beyond coincidence.

Besides, though Occam's Razor does apply to Physics, i'm pretty sure it does not apply to human behaviour. Ie a conspiracy theory might seem complicated compared to incompetence theory, but it's a fact that conspiracies, even big conspiracies (ie Watergate, Iran-Contra) do take place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-27-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. I personally don't believe
Occam's Razor applies to Bush's ports deal - I believe both answers are correct actually, and are not mutually exclusive of one another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC