Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawyers in CIA Leak Case Tangle Over Sharing of Information (WaPo)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 08:22 AM
Original message
Lawyers in CIA Leak Case Tangle Over Sharing of Information (WaPo)
Lawyers in CIA Leak Case Tangle Over Sharing of Information

By R. Jeffrey Smith
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, March 3, 2006; Page A04

Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald said in a court affidavit released yesterday that indicted former White House official I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby is not entitled to know everything that government investigators learned about other leaks to reporters regarding Valerie Plame's employment as a covert CIA operative.

The affidavit, released by the U.S. District Court in Washington with lengthy redactions on 16 of its 19 pages, asserts that Libby's defense team has already been told what it needs to know about other Bush administration contacts with reporters and that granting its request for more information would compromise "innocent accuseds," breach confidences and delve into irrelevant matters.

The affidavit prepared for the presiding judge in the case is the latest joust by Fitzgerald in a battle with defense lawyers over how much information the prosecution must disclose before the start of Libby's trial on charges of perjury, making false statements and obstructing justice during the government's probe into the improper disclosure of Plame's role. The trial of Libby, 55, who was chief of staff to Vice President Cheney, is now expected to begin next January.

Fitzgerald says he has said more than he has to about his investigation; Libby's lawyers say they cannot prepare an adequate defense without learning everything the prosecution knows about what other Bush administration officials told reporters.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/02/AR2006030201743.html

Fitz's pdf & Some info from emptywheel
http://thenexthurrah.typepad.com/the_next_hurrah/2006/03/about_the_journ.html#more
http://thenexthurrah.typepad.com/the_next_hurrah/files/fitz_response.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC