Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WooHoo - Ex-Fauxer's killer --DRY, very DRY-- ltr to O'LOOFAH

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 10:12 AM
Original message
WooHoo - Ex-Fauxer's killer --DRY, very DRY-- ltr to O'LOOFAH
*******QUOTE*******

http://www.obscurestore.com/

From CHARLIE REINA, former producer, Fox News: An open letter to Bill O'Reilly:

Dear Bill:

I just watched a clip from Monday's "Factor" featuring Eric Burns, the host of your network's media criticism show, News Watch. During the segment, you implored Eric to fire one of his panelists, Neal Gabler, whom you called a "rabid dog" and described as "cowardly" for declining an invitation to appear on your show. Since not a word was said in Neal's defense, I would appreciate an opportunity to do so as a guest on the "Factor."

As you know, I was the producer of "News Watch" from its inception in 1997 until I left FNC six years later. (By the way, thank you for complimenting "News Watch." I'm sure I speak for all of us responsible for making it exactly what it is today, the best show in FNC's weekend lineup.) Neal joined us in 2002, replacing Jeff Cohen in the panel's "liberal" chair. Like Jeff, he took seriously management's implicit "hands-off" pledge to News Watch, and he clearly has felt free to criticize Fox during debates on the show. For the most part, Fox has made good on its pledge, and I would hate to think that Neal's job is in jeopardy now just because he offended the network's highest-rated personality.

Bill, I know that you don't engage in personal attacks, so I'm sure the "rabid dog" thing was merely a bit of hyperbole -- nothing more serious than, say, calling a harmless blowhard a "demagogue." But it was disappointing to see your characterization of Neal as a coward go unchallenged. As you know, people of all stripes often refuse to appear on programs for reasons other than cowardice -- for instance, when they consider the show or its host or other guests beneath their dignity. A case in point: Brent Bozell of the Media Research Center won't appear on any show alongside Jeff Cohen. At least, that's what Bozell told us when we invited him to fill the "News Watch" panel's "conservative" seat one week and he turned us down flat.

There are many other examples we can discuss. And I'm not even including cases in which hosts declare topics taboo after they've had their say on them. If you invite me, I promise not to raise any subject you may have vowed never to speak of again. I would, though, like to discuss -- in general terms, of course -- other acts that happen in and around television newsrooms which might be considered cowardly. For instance, a physically-imposing on-air personality publicly humiliating a staffer so cruelly that she can no longer return to work. Or a network public relations department so depraved that it sets out, behind the scenes, on a campaign to destroy the career of another channel's rising on-air star. Or a network executive who feels free to embarrass a vulnerable young anchorwoman by ogling her legs on a public escalator as others watch.

Anyway, Bill, I think we could have a really eye-opening discussion. Properly promoted, it could raise your already-astronomical numbers a notch. And it might even do me some good. Remember when I agreed to have you on "News Watch" so you could promote one of your novels? If you return the favor, the book I'm writing could wind up a best-seller.

All the best.

Charlie Reina

********UNQUOTE*******
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Beautiful, just beautiful!
You can bet the ranch that O'Reilly will NOT be responding to this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. yes, but as fast as this letter will make the rounds
o'reilly's lack of response will be a response in itself.

it might do liberals/progressives good to promote it loudly as a response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ha! good one.
Edited on Fri Mar-03-06 10:19 AM by npincus
BTW, can you tell me the HTML code for the yellow highlighting?

thanx.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Here'tis - with thanks to SoCalDem, our html guru
(span style="background:yellow")HIGHLIGHTED TEXT HERE(/span)

Substitute brackets for the parentheses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. thank yew!
I will use it sparingly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Brilliant Charlie Reina
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wow! Hard to believe someone like that could have ever been involved with
FAUX.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Well, the operative phrase there IS "former" Fox producer.
Before the late 90s, Fox wasn't significantly different from the other news networks, albiet slightly more conservative. They still made a pretense of objectivity.

A lot of good people bailed when the changes there became so blatant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. *My* fave operative words: "the BOOK I'M WRITING" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kick for Friday night dump n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. O.K. -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. One more. This is too good to disappear.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thank you, 11 Bravo n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC