AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-05-06 11:39 AM
Original message |
Bush wiretapping Amanpour=actually wiretapping Kerry campaign? |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 11:44 AM by chimpsrsmarter
Her husband Jamie Rueben worked for Kerry so was the Kerry campaign the actual target?
|
Cooley Hurd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-05-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message |
stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-05-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Yes this is the point that has to be made. n/t |
Loonman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-05-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message |
waiting for hope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-05-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Oh, what a delicious connection..... |
|
but lets not forget the "if" factor..
|
LeftNYC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-05-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message |
5. 2000-Present: Everyone is guilty before being proven innocent |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 11:43 AM by LeftNYC
except our King.
|
Ezlivin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-05-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Wiretapping Kerry AND being fed via wireless during the "debates" |
|
They had to ensure total victory by whatever means possible.
|
PATRICK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-05-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Whatever happened to that mugging and to the hard drive? Was it, like, just a disappointed WalMart shopper?
|
thereismore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-05-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message |
8. I hope KO will bust this door wide open. tn |
mattomjoe
(598 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-05-06 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
9. I'm hoping there is a revelation about wiretapping Kerry. |
|
For me, that would be the breaking point where we will know if our government will hold itself accountable or not. If it comes out, and nothing comes of it, I fear for what's next.....
|
Boo Boo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-05-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 12:00 PM by Boo Boo
I suppose that could be, but I think a more likely scenario would be that Amanpour, in the course of her reporting, had contact with somebody who was in some way or another linked to al Qaeda or the Iraqi insurgency, and that she then came under surveillance because, as Bush put it, "we'd like to know what the enemy is thinking."
Now, once you're tapping Amanpour's phone, and scooping up other signal intelligence related to her communications, then it's quite possible (likely, I'd think) that the raw data collected by the NSA would include conversations related to her husband's work.
Did partisans in the Bush Admin get access to that data? Or, was that sort of thing screened out before the information was passed along to whomever. It's an interesting question, and I get the feeling we're gonna be finding out before this is over.
:popcorn:
|
librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-05-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Yes--if this is true, then all their excuse-making about terror |
|
will be shown to be a cover up--as I suspected, personal and venal reasons drove Bush to break the law, not zeal to do his duty to the country.
Look at history, freeps--your guys are dirty by nature, admit it.
|
SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-05-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Of course it was.. a side benefit was that Christianne reported |
|
a lot of negative stuff on Bush..a two-fer..
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 10:59 PM
Response to Original message |