Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

South Dakota Taliban to destroy Mount Rushmore: graven images banned

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 02:17 PM
Original message
South Dakota Taliban to destroy Mount Rushmore: graven images banned
Edited on Tue Mar-07-06 02:17 PM by Democrats_win
Recall that the Afghan Taliban destroyed ancient Buddhist statues carved into a mountain because any images are forbidden under Islam.

Christianity, has a similar ban. From the ten commandments:


Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth


Christians can't pick and choose which commandments to keep can they? Anyway, isn't the hypocrisy of the christian right amazing? Don't forget their embrace of usury either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did you have to remind them, dammit!
Bye bye, Mount Rushmore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. actually, we do need to remind them. Shows the true nature of their
stupidity and moronic uber-belief-system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. But they're too dumb and too programmed to get the irony
They'll just go a break the images
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. yes, the ones in charge. But was is more important?
a nice tourist attraction (until they add Saint Ronnie's face to it) or the state of our nation?

If we make them get as extreme as they want to be, the continuing pressure of their own views will drive people back to normality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. It sounds good on paper, but they've gone pretty far already
Hmm...

Still undecided....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. this nations laws do not come from the Bible
When is everyone going to learn this?!?!? :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Modern Christianity is smorgasbord Christianity
Groups or churches pick and choose which parts of the bible they will use and worship. If it is not mentioned by the leaders of your sect or church, then it must not apply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Finally!
I am so sick of seeing Teddy Roosevelt's smug puss staring down at me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FuzzySlippers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Teddy Roosevelt?
Hell! What about Franklin? He was practically a commie!:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Pretty sick of FDR mocking me every time I need a dime! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. You Know, Until You Posted the Wording
It had never struck me how broad the second commandment is. I always thought it was restricted to idols, but it looks like the Muslims are correct -- all statutes, pictures, and photos are banned.

And that's not the only commandment Christians repudiate. It applies to most of them. Maybe displaying the ten commandments in public would make that apparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. yes, "images", that includes the Christ corpse-on-a-stick
but then again, getting a modern Christian to actually take the bible seriously is a waste of time. They just do what feels right and ignore the rest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bushy Being Born Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Yeah, and here I was against displaying the commandments on public ground
when what that actually would accomplish is make their hypocrisy more apparent. Maybe I should rethink my position! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B3Nut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Actually, the whole context of that verse
actually does narrow the focus to idols, "graven images" being man-made artifacts built with the intent to worship. Also such an exegesis fits in with the historical context, idol-worship being a characteristic of many groups of people at that time. But this too often will trip up a fundie, as historically-aware exegesis is not often one of their strong points. They're too woodenly literal in their approach, oblivious to the concepts of allegory, parable, and metaphor. Sad, that. At any rate, other translations do a little better at bringing out the meaning of the Hebrew.

The NIV is a bit clearer in the meanings in Exodus 20:

4 "You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, 6 but showing love to a thousand {generations} of those who love me and keep my commandments.

NASB:

4"(E)You shall not make for yourself an idol, or any likeness of what is in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the water under the earth.

Just an alternative POV to toss out there...

Todd in Beerbratistan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Maybe it is a Matter of Translation
Idolatry is certainly the context, and the term "graven image" would seem to refer to idols.

What stood out to me was the second part: "any likeness". That sounds more Muslim than Christian.

It is true that there's a long historical tradition in the West of confining that verse to prohibitions of idols. But in Islam, which was virtually founded on anti-idolatry, there's a long tradition of applying it more broadly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. are these the same ones who want sir(senile) ronnie up there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. In America, only the Amish really practice Christianity.
And it can be argued that even they ignore some tenets of the faith. Still, ask a Bible thumping evangelical Baptist to live like an Amish person, and they'll look at you like you're insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. the thought of that destruction still makes me sad.
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. Excellent point! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. Nah, they'd piss off their followers.
They would have to get rid of all the angel and fish images they are so fond of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC