Phoebe Loosinhouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-22-06 08:22 AM
Original message |
How is an electronic voting machine any different than an exploding tire |
|
or an unsafe bunkbed that collapses or a Pinto that blows up, or Vioxx?
My point is that I think the easiest way of ridding ourselves of the biggest threat to democracy (electronic voting machines) is a class action product liability lawsuit. These machines simply do not work as promised - they are unreliable, insecure, and vulnerable to hacking. On these pages today are problems being reported with different machines in different states - California, Texas and Illinois. The taxpayers of any state that has invested in these expensive, malfunctioning ripoffs deserve a refund for the monies that they have already spent.
|
the_expatriate
(7 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-22-06 08:27 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I'm amazed that we are not furious, as a nation, that our very electoral system has been compromised. Eh. No biggie.
Supersize that?
|
acmejack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-22-06 08:41 AM
Response to Original message |
2. We've been so neutered by "tort reform" |
|
I wonder if we can do it successfully.
|
Phoebe Loosinhouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-22-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Product liability suits are alive and well as far as I know. nt. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:34 AM
Response to Original message |