|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 12:26 PM Original message |
Deceased miners were within 2,000 ft of breathable air. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enki23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. i think you mean miners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 12:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Of course I meant miners. Aside from the spelling lesson, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Winston702 (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. They were also within 2000 ft on UNbreathable air |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maiden England (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 12:42 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I think they could have gone 2000ft with their 1 1/2 hour air supply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 12:46 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. They could have walked to the surface in an hour and a half. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 12:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I'm sorry. I can't understand your point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mountainvue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 02:32 PM Response to Reply #5 |
28. I was curious as to why they didn't try to walk out. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 05:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
37. My take on it is that they didn't know they were that close to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 05:45 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. That's exactly what happened. But, they could have sent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
norml (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
7. I wonder how much exposure this information will get? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wallybarron (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 12:55 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Link please? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 12:58 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I read the article in this morning's Atlanta Journal Constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 01:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 01:15 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mountainvue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 02:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. This could certainly explain why the first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 12:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I don't know. Personally, I was so upset that I could hardly finish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wallybarron (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 01:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Found it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 01:17 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. It is the most flagrant violation of safety I've ever heard of in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Waya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 01:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. I don't know.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 01:19 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Valid points. However, I don't believe that the 12,000 ft distance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 02:40 PM Response to Reply #22 |
30. More Like 2.27 Miles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 04:12 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Bad arithmetic by me. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
11. Whats the link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 01:09 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I read the article in this morning's Atlanta Journal Constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
12. Suggestion for the WV legislature |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 01:14 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. You are correct that walking uses up more air. But, their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divernan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 01:16 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. At least the mine manager should be the first one in . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 01:20 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Excellent points. I believe that a strong union at Sago would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 01:36 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. Hats off to your dad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wallybarron (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 01:18 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Unfortunately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 01:22 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Exactly. Hello fascism. Wake up America. You are being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
26. Terribly sad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
27. Tragic. Miners were very much let down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 04:13 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. They need some lawmakers in their corner and a good union |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lindacooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
33. I want to know why in the hell they are only give one hour of oxygen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 04:33 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. I agree. Also, air supplies could be stashed all along the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Batsen D Belfry (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 05:21 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. I don't think the extra oxygen is an issue of cost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 05:27 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. I didn't mean that the breathing stations would have oxygen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lindacooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-08-06 05:26 AM Response to Reply #36 |
45. I did hear on CNN about mines that do have safety stations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 05:44 PM Response to Reply #33 |
40. Miners have been trying to do that for centuries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 05:47 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. It's called fascism. We have a country this is run by big business. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lindacooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-08-06 05:27 AM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Sadly, you're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohio_liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 06:43 PM Response to Reply #33 |
44. They're using 30 year old technology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Batsen D Belfry (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
35. While I agree the operators of that mine should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 05:39 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. A well designed pre-place robot-probe could and would have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohio_liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-07-06 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
43. Good point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 03:26 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC