Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's one of the laws under which Chimpy can immediately be prosecuted:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 05:36 PM
Original message
Here's one of the laws under which Chimpy can immediately be prosecuted:
From TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 73 > § 1505:

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.


http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00001505----000-.html

It's all very, very simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cite the instance of the crime
for the folks playing at home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. For THREE YEARS the Chimp has corruptly endeavored to influence
the Plame investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cushla_machree Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think he did
Even though he wasn't under oath, it looks like to me he obstructed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No question about it.
No oaths even enter into this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC