Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have a question about Cox Communications

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
drthais Donating Member (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 09:59 PM
Original message
I have a question about Cox Communications
does any DUer know whether COX has been implicated
in the 'giving everything over to the NSA' scandal? re: internet services?
what about Cingular?RE: phone services....

I am ready to do battle
I want to make sure that companies I have contracted with
are not giving over access to the NSA
but I need info


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cingular is SBC/ATT
Last I heard, they were "cooperating."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. do you have Cox?
Seems like they'd want more than just ATT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Cox has not ...

I can't go into detail about how I know that, but I know. I'm not saying they won't. The pressure to cooperate is fairly intense. But, so far, they have remained at arm's length from this whole mess and have publicly declared they have not cooperated in the matter to which you refer.

Caveat: No communications provider in the US has been willing to resist federal warrants for information. That is, active investigation for which a clear, legal warrant was provided have induced all of these companies, including Cox, to turn over information.

Also note that backbone providers have pretty much all been implicated as cooperating, which makes much of this moot. If you can "spy" on the backbone, you don't need the downstream providers except as convenience.

Here's a link to a news story about it that mentions Cox:

http://news.com.com/Some+companies+helped+the+NSA,+but+who/2100-1028_3-6035305.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC