Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UnionBusters start sweating: "America's job creators would do well to pay attention..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Earth Bound Misfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:59 AM
Original message
UnionBusters start sweating: "America's job creators would do well to pay attention..."
Edited on Tue May-04-10 08:01 AM by Earth Bound Misfit
Edit to add link: http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/current.php?artType=view&artMonth=May&artYear=2010&EntryNo=10966

Union Agenda Implemented Behind The Scenes
Published: May 03, 2010

Glenn Spencer
Executive Director
Workforce Freedom Initiative
U.S. Chamber of Commerce

In the arena of labor policy, the overriding focus for the past year has been on the Employee Free Choice Act, also known as Card Check. This focus was well deserved, as Card Check would have dramatically altered labor law and stacked the deck in favor of unions during organizing drives and subsequent contract negotiations.

Yet with Card Check temporarily stalled in the Senate, it's time to take a look at the other items on the union wish list. And employers should make no mistake - the list is voluminous.

Aside from Card Check, a critical priority for organized labor has been to secure a staunchly pro-union majority on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). With President Obama's recess appointment of Craig Becker in March, this goal has been realized. While Becker failed to win a full five-year term after being rejected in a bi-partisan vote by the Senate, his ascension to the NLRB gives the pro-union forces a 3-1 majority on the Board. With this slanted majority, the NLRB will seek to overturn numerous decisions from past years such as Dana/Metaldyne , which established the primacy of the secret ballot over Card Check and Oakwood Healthcare , which clarified which workers could be considered supervisors.

The NLRB will not, however, simply sit back and wait for the appropriate cases to come its way. Current Chairwoman Wilma Liebman, a Democratic appointee, has made it clear that the Board will engage in active rulemaking for the first time in nearly 30 years. Rulemaking could change NLRB policy in a number of ways, most significantly by shortening the election window during union organizing campaigns from an average of approximately 38 days to as little as five or 10. The Board may also place additional limits on employer speech rights and attempt to give union organizers access to an employer's workplace. Finally, the NLRB could even issue rules requiring the recognition of non-majority "mini-unions" that represent only a fraction of a potential bargaining unit. Outside of rulemaking, the Board is also likely to make greater use of Gissel bargaining orders, essentially forcing employers to recognize a union even where it has failed to demonstrate majority support.

Unions also wanted a Department of Labor (DOL) that would be far more sympathetic to union interests, and in this they have not been disappointed. Aside from filling DOL's political ranks with appointees straight out of the labor movement, the Department has launched a number of anti-employer and pro-union initiatives.


snip

The White House itself has gotten into the action with a series of pro-union Executive Orders signed in early 2009, which are now coming to fruition through the regulatory process. And a potential new Executive Order would impose much of the unions' sweeping social agenda on a wide swath of the economy by rigging the government contracting process. Referred to as the "High Road" contracting initiative, this new policy would give a bonus in contracting scores to companies that provide their employees with a "living wage" and offer employer-sponsored health and retirement benefits as well as paid sick leave. The catch is that these wages and benefits would have to be offered to every worker at a particular company - not just those working on the contract. This would effectively impose "living wage" requirements on more than 20 percent of the nation's workforce. The result would be decreased competition for government contracts and higher costs to the taxpayers.

snip

The fight over Card Check was a high-profile affair, full of drama and headlines. Yet much of the work to enact the union agenda has been going on behind the scenes, day in and day out in the trenches. America's job creators would do well to pay attention and get involved, because it is this attritional warfare that will determine organized labor's ultimate success or failure in fulfilling its goals.

------------------------------------

SPIN, BABY, SPIN!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC