seemslikeadream
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-19-08 01:11 AM
Original message |
Countdown: Special Comment August 18, 2008 Part 2 |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-19-08 01:22 AM by seemslikeadream
|
Divine Discontent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-19-08 01:35 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I enjoyed all of that... |
|
especially right AT 4:00, and forward. Keith is amazing, and speaks what so many millions of us feel daily - I thank him for berating them for thinking THEY get to dictate how they are viewed by the public, for how THEY are reported on, and for how THEY are entitled to getting the White House again because of how Sen. McCain has said he's "agreed with president b*sh far more than I've disagreed".
MCLAME/MCSAME/MCWAR & MORE - www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable
|
bulloney
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-19-08 05:53 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I think the McCain campaign is engaging in a game of semantics. |
|
They appear to have chosen their words carefully to disclaim reports that McCain had the advantage in knowing what Obama's responses were in the interview.
They'll say MCCAIN did not hear any of the Obama interview. They did not hear any BROADCAST of the interview and yada yada.
Maybe that's true, but has the McCain campaign denied that anybody other than the senator listened to the Obama interview? Did they dismiss any possibility of McCain reading notes or hearing any CLOSED CIRCUIT transmission of the interview?
It's a way of appearing that you're telling the truth without telling the truth. And I'm under the impression that Rev. Warren is an accomplice in the whole thing. He stated that they flipped a coin to determine who's interviewed first. How was that done if McCain wasn't present? Warren made at least two references to McCain being in that 'cone of silence' when he knew that McCain wasn't present at the beginning of the Obama interview.
|
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-19-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message |
L0oniX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-19-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message |
mopinko
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-19-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message |
5. airbrushed- this is literally true |
|
i saw a shot a few weeks ago where lumpy grumpy's cheek slipped out of the usual soft focused spot that seems to always be on it. he turned his head, and a big ole scar popped out, then the spot moved over. i don't remember where i saw it, but most likely cnn. i have been looking for this since then, and have yet to see a shot where that filtering is not being applied. i am just gobsmacked at the implication of this, even after all these years of propaganda.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:48 AM
Response to Original message |