babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 03:31 PM
Original message |
Tucker Bounds on Phil Gramm in McCain's administration |
|
Run time: 01:09
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2Gnhwbxnw0
Posted on YouTube: September 21, 2008
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
Posted on DU: September 21, 2008
By DU Member: babylonsister
Views on DU: 1423 |
|
trueblue2007
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Phil Gramm has a criminal mentality. And Mr. Gramm, I am NOT a whiner. |
ryanmuegge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. He's a sociopath, like many in government in both parties. |
cosmicsheep
(131 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I believe that is what is known as a non-denial denial |
|
"IT'S ABSURD!!!"
says the poor little always attacked Republican shill.
What's absurd is that any one still gives any credence to these liars.
|
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |
3. This interview is hilarious. |
Jack Rabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Tucker should find another line of work |
trthnd4jstc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Former Senator Gramm is vastly Rich. Of Course he has a shut your mouth attitude typical of: |
|
The Republican Party. Many in the Republican Party like to believe: Shut your mouth, get back to work, and do what you are told. They are tyrants. They are evil. They do not want to be touched whatsoever by anothers misery. They simply wish to enjoy their country club existence.
|
DrZeeLit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Every time this idiot "Tucker" shows up I see WEASEL... they should just run that in bold |
|
under his face every time he's on a show.
I mean.... this guy is a farce. If voters would merely judge the candidate by the mouthpieces sent out to spread the message --- OY! No contest.
He's beyond a tool... he's a ... SCHMOOL or something.
WEASEL
|
raystorm7
(944 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Tucker Bounds is doing a great JOB. Making the McCain camp look stupid as hell. |
kemamusa
(63 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Why does Tucker Bounds still have this job??? |
|
Why does Tucker Bounds still have this job??? He gets repeatedly made fun of by TV "journalists". You'd think that's a SERIOUS flaw in a spokes person.. BTW, he also looks and sounds like Dana Carvey playing a retard.
|
Zambero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I'll take that as an evasive "yes" |
|
Based on this interview, it appears likely that McCain would appoint Gramm if he won, which he won't.
|
DWinNJ
(147 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Correct me if I’m wrong |
|
If someone asks you to make a declarative statement and you make a declarative statement wouldn’t that be STRAIGHT TALK and most anything else isn’t?
|
DeadManInc
(844 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I would love to smash that cocksucker right in the mouth just one time. |
|
I would bet anything he would cry like a baby.
|
green917
(124 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-21-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message |
13. That sounds like a resounding "YES" to me |
|
Tucker's non-denial denial is about as good as him saying "Yes, Sen. McCain is going to make Phil Graham an intricate part of his administration if he wins"
...and, let's face facts: making Phil Graham Secretary of the Treasury is like making Al Capone the Director of the FBI
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:39 PM
Response to Original message |