jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-26-09 11:01 AM
Original message |
Irans nuclear program futile, Clinton says |
timeforpeace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-26-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Guess that's better than saying we can't, or won't, do anything about it. |
Hulk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-26-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Wonder how vannity, limpballs and the rest of the right wing will spin this? |
|
I'm sure they'll say it's a sign of weakness that we don't just go in there and nuke the SOB's into submission, after all, their population is longing for freedom and democracy, right?
It must be painful to have an administration that is actually calculated and pragmatic. I know it seems much smarter to our morons in this nation to just start another war and teach these heathens what democracy and freedom is all about.
It's a damn shame we are so f*cking stupid as a nation.
|
billyoc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-26-09 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Although not as futile as whining about it, since it will actually generate electricity. |
Advocatus_Diaboli
(13 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-26-09 12:57 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I'm confused and not trying to be flip, |
|
But seriously, how does the US, with or without the support of other countries, just cold declare that a sovereign country doesn't have the right to anything? I'm not a fan of nuclear weapons but why is it that the US (the only country that ever used an atomic weapon against an enemy, I might add) now sits in judgment of who shall and who shall not have these weapons? Even if Iran is a signatory to the NNP Treaty, don't they have a sovereign right to withdraw?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 02:32 AM
Response to Original message |