swag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-04-09 05:18 PM
Original message |
Contracts for Wall Street, None for Workers? |
sasquatch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-04-09 05:35 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Kick ass and take names |
truedelphi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-04-09 05:47 PM
Response to Original message |
2. This was so refreshening. Finally someone on our side who |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-04-09 05:48 PM by truedelphi
Is articulate.
Moderater for Money Channel "We live in a market economy." Reply "We live in a market economy, that is that way, BECAUSE workers have bailed it out."
|
Amos Moses
(551 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-04-09 05:58 PM
Response to Original message |
3. You can bet he'll never be asked back on that show. |
|
It burns me up to listen to them whine about their contracts while people that live paycheck to paycheck get pissed on. It's even worse that our government condones it. :grr:
|
bertman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-04-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Who was that guy? He was GREAT!!! Somebody finally shut the whiny bitch up. |
Amos Moses
(551 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-04-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Which whiny bitch are you referring to? |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-04-09 06:14 PM by Amos Moses
There were two of them.
|
bertman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-04-09 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. the nasally whiny bitch. Sorry I wasn't clearer. I should have distinguished between |
|
the whiny bitch and the whiny asshole.
:hi:
|
angstlessk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-04-09 06:08 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I would love to see the rest of that debate... |
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-04-09 06:25 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Wow, how did he make it on that fascist show? Good for him! nt |
boomerbust
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-04-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message |
ro1942
(701 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-04-09 09:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
that was so on point,very well done. thanks for posting
|
ThomCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-04-09 10:46 PM
Response to Original message |
11. That was wonderful! And those two clearly didn't want to hear it |
|
that everyone knows there is one set of rules for wall street and another set of rules for everyone else.
There is no reason a contract on Wall Street should be sacred when contracts everywhere else are shredded and ignored when they companies can get government permission to do so.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message |