Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Grampy McBush tells Chris Wallace that Republicans Need A New Contract With America

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:18 AM
Original message
Grampy McBush tells Chris Wallace that Republicans Need A New Contract With America
 
Run time: 03:11
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gp4iuZwsEL8
 
Posted on YouTube: September 05, 2010
By YouTube Member: atmain
Views on YouTube: 98
 
Posted on DU: September 05, 2010
By DU Member: Amerigo Vespucci
Views on DU: 745
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/05/mccain-paul-ryan-social-security_n_706086.html

Today on "Fox News Sunday," Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) called for Senate Republicans to put out a detailed agenda of the party's policy ideas, but when pressed about his position on changing Social Security, he said he "can't endorse a specific proposal."

When host Chris Wallace asked McCain whether he is "comfortable with some of the Tea Party ideas that would dramatically shrink the size and the scope of the federal government," the senator said he favored repealing and replacing "Obamacare," introducing a balanced budget amendment, and eliminating pork barrel spending -- ideas that could constitute some sort of contract with America.

McCain also agreed the GOP caucus should "come forward with an agenda before the election," saying the American public needs a reason to vote for Republicans. Wallace then brought up Rep. Paul Ryan's (R-WI) Roadmap for America's Future, which proposes changing Social Security by giving "workers under 55 the option of investing over one third of their current Social Security taxes into personal retirement accounts." McCain paused, before shying away from the idea and saying he "can't endorse a specific proposal."

WALLACE: I just want to get back to this idea, the contract. The House Republicans are talking about, I guess they'll call it a Commitment to America. But Senate Republicans haven't been talking about that. Are you saying Senate Republicans should come forward with their own affirmative agenda between now and the election?

McCAIN: I think the Senate and House Republicans should come forward with an agenda before the election. Yes. You know, as much as, as happy as we are about the outcome of the elections, when you look at the approval ratings of Republicans they're just as bad as Democrats. We have to give them a reason to vote for us.

WALLACE: Let's talk about a few specifics that have come out from some member of the House Republican Caucus, like Paul Ryan with his roadmap and some of the Tea Partiers. Do you support the idea of allowing those under 55 -- not talking about people near retirement now -- allowing people under 55 to put up to a third of their payroll taxes in private accounts?

McCAIN: Frankly, I haven't seen that particular issue and in that detail, but everybody knows, all Americans know that we're going to have to fix Social Security and Medicare. And I notice that the Democrats are focusing in and they've rolled out the tired old, golden oldie that the Republicans are going to destroy Social Security. Which by the way, after Obamacare, they cut Medicare by half a trillion dollars, and also are doing away with Medicare advantage. So we don't talk about Republicans going to cut Medicare. But we need to sit down and we need to do what Ronald Reagan and Tip O'Neill did and come up with a solution. We know we need to do that, but I can't endorse a specific proposal.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/05/mccain-paul-ryan-social-security_n_706086.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. He means a contract out on america.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. a contract to disappear into an oblivion
we have seen how nazi-like they people are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. They already have a contract on america, similar to the one they had
before. Yes, it's a contract ON America. He wants all of us to be contract workers with no benefits at all, as well as the Mafioso meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. If they win ..
they will play fake bipartisanship,with ultimatums at every turn,to box in Dems who will take this as a message that this is what the people want thinking this will give them cover to do nothing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah so I wonder what
He really thinks of Sarah Palin.. who helped get him defeated. He says he welcomes the Tea party even though most of them don't represent a true cross of Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandR Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Political Theory Fail
Edited on Sun Sep-05-10 08:10 PM by LandR
Let's give engulf and devour Republicans for a moment and allow to them to say that even if they could magically form a coalition between House and Senate Republicans, it would not be effective. The first Contract with America had ten goals, and three became laws - one of those goals was the line-item veto and the Supreme Court struck that down in Clinton v. City of New York. The point being is that even if the Republicans have the House and Senate, they are not effective. In a coalition that only concerns the House and Senate, the Republicans are focusing too much on Congress in the law-making process and really ought to include the President or Executive Branch into negotiations, unless an unlikely supermajority can be reached in Congress. The Contract with America was not a plan for governing, it was a plan for getting elected. Though having a clear platform is good for a party during a campaign and it would also help Republicans make this election about Democrats vs. Republicans, rather races focusing on individual vs. individual, Republicans cannot come together to even make a simple list of objectives. Additionally, the Contract with America was after 40 years of a Democratic majority in the House, so that helped fuel Republicans to form the coalition in 1994 as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC