The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See (part 1 of 8)

[wundermaus]

Run time: 03:56 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=147A45EF50D   Posted on YouTube: April 17, 2015 By YouTube Member: YouTube Help Views on YouTube: 13022959   Posted on DU: April 20, 2011 By DU Member: wundermaus Views on DU: 2226

 
Description: "2 million views for an old codger giving a lecture about arithmetic? What's going on? You'll just have to watch to see what's so damn amazing about what he (Prof. Albert Bartlett) has to say. When I saw this lecture at a conference in 1995, I came out blasted, thinking "This needs to be required listening for every person on the planet. Nothing else will matter if we don't understand this." The presenter is Albert Bartlett, a retired Physics prof. at U of Colorado-Boulder. The presentation is titled "Arithmetic, Population, and Energy," and I introduce it to my students as "The most boring video you'll ever see, and the most important." But then again, after viewing it most said that if you followed along with what Bartlett is saying, it's quite easy to pay attention, because the content is so damn compelling. If you forward this to everyone you know, we might actually stand a chance in staving off disaster in the global finance system, peak oil, climate change, and every other resource issue you can think of. Without a widespread understanding of what Bartlett's talking about, I think we won't be able to dodge ANY of those issues. BE ABSOLUTELY SURE you catch the parts about "the bacteria in the bottle" (in Part 3) and the list comparing things that add to the problem and things that address the problem. If we don't choose from that right-hand column, nature will choose for us. I for one, would rather we be the ones making the choice."

Total length is 1 hour and 15 minutes. Amazing that it has not been posted here earlier...

if the link does not work start here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY

[byronius]

1. Here's the playlist for all parts:

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=6A1FD147A45EF50D

Fascinating.

[wundermaus]

4. Thanks for posting the playlist...

As the link didn't work on the original post.

[The Backlash Cometh]

2. Where's the video?

[stockholmer]

3. Malthusian eugenic claptrap, plus ignores the huge male sperm count drop in the last 50 years

Most of the West core nations, Eastern Europe, Russia, and the highly developed parts of Asia have birthrates well below simple population replacement levels. Since 1950, the male sperm count in the west has dropped over 50%, in some cases over 80%. Radiation (including electro-magnetic) of all sorts is partly to blame. The key to lowering population growth rates in th less developed nations is to raise their standards of living. This is not what these eugenicists want to do, in fact it is the opposite. Dr. Albert Bartlett from the video is big believer in Malthusian meta-narratives.

Planned Parenthood founder Margaret 'Blacks are Weeds' Sanger (who was a Klan sympathizer and ardent Nazi supporter), HG 'Lets Gas the Genetic Misfits' Wells, Hitler the beast himself, Paul 'My Book 43 Years Ago Was So Wrong' Ehrlich, and his co-author of the book Ecoscience John P. Holdren (Obama's Science Czar), etc etc etc, are/were all lunatic eugenicists.

Samples from Ecoscience (1977):

Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food;
• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;
• People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
• A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed international police force.


Margaret Sanger in her own words :

On blacks, immigrants and indigents:
"...human weeds,' 'reckless breeders,' 'spawning... human beings who never should have been born." Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, referring to immigrants and poor people

On sterilization & racial purification:
Sanger believed that, for the purpose of racial "purification," couples should be rewarded who chose sterilization. Birth Control in America, The Career of Margaret Sanger, by David Kennedy, p. 117, quoting a 1923 Sanger speech.

On the right of married couples to bear children:
Couples should be required to submit applications to have a child, she wrote in her "Plan for Peace." Birth Control Review, April 1932

On the purpose of birth control:
The purpose in promoting birth control was "to create a race of thoroughbreds," she wrote in the Birth Control Review, Nov. 1921 (p. 2)

On the rights of the handicapped and mentally ill, and racial minorities:
"More children from the fit, less from the unfit -- that is the chief aim of birth control." Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12

On religious convictions regarding sex outside of marriage:
"This book aims to answer the needs expressed in thousands on thousands of letters to me in the solution of marriage problems... Knowledge of sex truths frankly and plainly presented cannot possibly injure healthy, normal, young minds. Concealment, suppression, futile attempts to veil the unveilable - these work injury, as they seldom succeed and only render those who indulge in them ridiculous. For myself, I have full confidence in the cleanliness, the open-mindedness, the promise of the younger generation." Margaret Sanger, Happiness in Marriage (Bretano's, New York, 1927)

On the extermination of blacks:
"We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population," she said, "if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." Woman's Body, Woman's Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America, by Linda Gordon

On respecting the rights of the mentally ill:
In her "Plan for Peace," Sanger outlined her strategy for eradication of those she deemed "feebleminded." Among the steps included in her evil scheme were immigration restrictions; compulsory sterilization; segregation to a lifetime of farm work; etc. Birth Control Review, April 1932, p. 107

On adultery:
A woman's physical satisfaction was more important than any marriage vow, Sanger believed. Birth Control in America, p. 11

On marital sex:
"The marriage bed is the most degenerating influence in the social order," Sanger said. (p. 23)




Doubt me? Go look up it up all for yourself. I for one am pro-human.

[greiner3]

6. Where in the hell do you get your information?

I thought this was a post from an Onion piece but I see you are serious.

Your post has the overtones of Fox, Rush and others that are pushing a certain agenda. Please repost as your facts are false, misleading and wrong.

If you still believe your facts are correct please post your research and links.

For one, Sanger did lecture to the KKK. However, she later wrote of this experience that she felt as if she were teaching to children as they had so little facts of human anatomy and sexuality. She was asked to do a series of lectures to this group and she did so.

As for eugenics, the 1930s were a sad time for genetics and the wrong headed ideas of trying to make the human experience a stronger one. Many leaders espoused eugenics as a way to keep the mentally ill, unstable and retarded from passing on their 'bad' genes. She had no ties to Nazi Germany and in fact condemned their attempts at eugenics.

Unfortunately I do not have time to refute all your false claims. I hope all who read our post/reply will check out the facts and make their own conclusions when they too see what the truth is.

As a poster on this site, I sincerely hope you just got bad information and do not believe what you wrote.

[stockholmer]

9. go read the source books, I absolutely stand by what I posted,& I'm a committed democratic socialist

here in Sweden. Please do not dump me into your false American left/right paradigm, especially with fools like Limbaugh and disinfo telly networks like Murdoch's deplorable Fox News. My 'agenda' is for the upraising of humanity against the Anglo/American banking cartel, and the UK spawned (since the early 1800's, not the 1930's) concept of scientific dictatorship, of which eugenics is a foundational tenet.

Go read the books I posted the quotes from. Do some independent research on the rise of the systemic controllers, and their hierarchies of thinking.
Then go see where they systemically place their money, their power, their multi-national foundations, NGO's, Quangos, and international political backings. Look to the real world implications at military, financial, sociological, and geo-political levels that this over-arching modus operandi has bourne forth.

Look at the primary source policy material that has rolled out since the days of the British Roundtable groups (ie. the Milner Group, the Rhodes Group, et al), which begat the Royal Institute for Foreign Affairs in London and its US offspring, the Council on Foreign Relations. Follow the eugenicists as they morphed post-WW2 and came to take over some of the nascent environmental groups, in some cases subsuming them wholesale and changing names to void the taint that the monster Hitler had wrought up the so-called 'science' of eugenics.

Look at statements like the UK's Prince Phillip, who said in his foreword to 'If I Were an Animal' (1986) "I just wonder what it would be like to be reincarnated in an animal whose species had been so reduced in numbers than it was in danger of extinction. What would be its feelings toward the human species whose population explosion had denied it somewhere to exist.... I must confess that I am tempted to ask for reincarnation as a particularly deadly virus."

Go read Ehrlich's and Holdren's 'Ecoscience', you will find all I posted and much more. And Holdren is the most powerful science office-holder in the US.

Go read Henry Kissinger's 1974 US National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (NSSM200). The plan called for collusion among the U.S. government, the United Nations and non-governmental organizations such as International Planned Parenthood Federation. According to NSSM 200: "Throughout the implementation of the process, we have to make sure to hide our tracks and disguise our programs as altruistic... hiding the fact that we want access to their natural resources."

Go read the 1968 Rockefeller Foundation yearly report, it's admitted funding the development of so-called “anti-fertility vaccines” and their implementation on a mass-scale. From page 51 "several types of drugs are known to diminish male fertility, but those that have been tested have serious problems of toxicity. Very little work is in progress on immunological methods, such as vaccines, to reduce fertility, and much more research is required if a solution is to be found here." http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/uploads/files/1496d619-017d-4b13-8a64-fce8ed4f785d-1968.pdf

In its 1998 Report ( http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/uploads/files/80610f05-587b-4c14-8b96-fc50c2950edc-1988.pdf )The Rockefeller Foundation was happy to report the progress made by the Foundation’s Population Division in the field of anti-fertility vaccines:

“India’s National Institute of Immunology successfully completed in 1988 the first phase of trials with three versions of an anti-fertility vaccine for women. Sponsored by the government of India and supported by the Foundation, the trials established that with each of the tested vaccines, at least one year of protection against pregnancy could be expected, based on the levels of antibodies formed in response to the immunization schedule.”

If you think the Rockefellers and others have abandoned their anti-fertility efforts with vaccines read this article :

http://www.scribd.com/doc/35471169/Will-the-Swine-Flu-Vaccine-Contain-Birth-Control-Substances

History is littered with the struggle of the oppressed versus the oligarchs and tyrants. The powerful always use the state of the art that is at their disposal and within their sphere of grasp to dominate. In the last 200 years, and especially the last 100 or so, they now combine genocidal foundational memes of power, class, breeding, and financial domination with a scientific system designed for the sublimation of billions by a few thousand or less systemic controllers.

I could go on and on.........................

I stand by my post 100%

[liberation]

12. Can you disprove the actual mathematics in this video?

[HolyCity2012]

5. -W A R N I N G -

[Thunderstruck]

7. Well? ...

Still waiting for your rebuttal to Prof. Bartlett...

[HolyCity2012]

8. Laugh Out Loud!

I encourage you to hold your breath whilst you wait.

[daleanime]

10. Thanks, I now know how much attention to give you.....

[liberation]

11. Fairly basic math

Why are exponential functions and their growth so hard to understand for some?