thomhartmann
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 10:54 AM
Original message |
Thom Hartmann vs. David Selig: What's wrong with paying people a living wage? |
|
Run time: 10:19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9LJGp-mykE
Posted on YouTube: April 26, 2011
By YouTube Member: TheBigPictureRT
Views on YouTube: 55
Posted on DU: April 26, 2011
By DU Member: thomhartmann
Views on DU: 1231 | The Big Picture with Thom Hartmann on RT TV "live" 9pm and 11pm check www.thomhartmann.com/tv for local listings
|
Plucketeer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 11:00 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Compelling argument Thom |
|
and this schmuk thinks 12 bucks a year is gonna ruin shoppers. Two people can blow past 12 bucks with ONE meal at any fast food emporium! I'll tell ys - these Right-Wing dweebs are either cold-hearted or simpleton stoopid!
|
rurallib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. not stoopid - evil, evil cold-hearted. |
xchrom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 11:10 AM
Response to Original message |
Kurovski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 11:45 AM
Response to Original message |
3. An excellent segment, highly recommended. |
|
Edited on Tue Apr-26-11 11:46 AM by Kurovski
I would say David was a pro-corporate regressive in his dismal outlook.
|
Kurovski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. No, I change that to "anti-worker" Regressive. |
bertman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 12:56 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Of course, Selig doesn't have to live on $12 per hour. He's likely pulling down |
|
a couple of mil per year, if not more.
Greed. Pure and simple. No empathy.
|
Kurovski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. I am given to wonder how much in Wal-Mart stock he owns. |
|
Edited on Tue Apr-26-11 01:04 PM by Kurovski
He just continues the Regressive Republican pile-on of demeaning American workers, the poor, and the very facts themselves.
|
xocet
(699 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. What can be done to unionize Wal-Mart? n/t |
Kurovski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
szatmar666
(532 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. the ruling class counts on US workers just not caring enough to stand up |
|
Edited on Tue Apr-26-11 05:37 PM by szatmar666
and they are sadly proven right. If workers were really hurting they would organize no matter what the law said simply because the alternative would be homelessness and starvation. Most people are simply not at that threshold thanks to 100 years of liberal policies. Catch 22, isn't it?! BTW there were no "card check" laws in 1880.
|
florida08
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
8. almost made it through |
|
This guys is basically saying 'be glad you have a job'. Now this statement that only lower middleclass shops at Walmart is not factual. I can tell you there's a Walmart in all compass directions where I live within 10 miles. They corner the market. Like Thom said virtually becoming a monopoly. I will go to smaller local stores..Ace, Radio Shack etc before going there just to patronize the stores that have been here before Walmart. But when I drive by I see LOTS of big SUV's and large extended cab trucks. New ones, not 10 years old. Jags and corvettes as well. People who work for Walmart could not afford the vehicles I see in the parking lot, and we don't live in a rich neighborhood either but people who do..certainly go to Walmart.
nuff said
|
Kurovski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 02:31 PM
Response to Original message |
Kurovski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-11 05:31 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:05 AM
Response to Original message |