walerosco
(449 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-24-11 06:38 PM
Original message |
Stingray' Phone Tracker and the violation of the 4th Amendment |
|
Run time: 03:55
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAmNqqV5DJ0
Posted on YouTube: September 22, 2011
By YouTube Member: LibertyAdvisor
Views on YouTube: 30
Posted on DU: September 24, 2011
By DU Member: walerosco
Views on DU: 1280 |
|
Grassy Knoll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-24-11 09:02 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It's Only OK if Rupert Murdoch does it......... |
|
I know he's your boss judge, but where's your report on the newscorp hacking scandal ? Um..ya know, to be a little fair and balanced.
|
WhoIsNumberNone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-24-11 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. It was OK when the Bush Administration did it. |
|
If it was President McCain's Justice Department doing this we wouldn't be hearing about it on Fox "News".
IOKIYAR
|
Dokkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-25-11 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. lemme get this straigh |
|
Your problem is that they did not criticize their boss crime which is under criminal investigation now. Lets just start by examining the 2 people in the video. One is Sherpard Smith, a man legendary for calling out conservatives and George Bush every chance he gets and the other Judge Andrew Napolitano, a man who cannot stop criticizing the last republican adminstration, hated the patriot act and a man who called for the George Bush impeachment. Which thanks to Nancy Pelosi never happened.
You are criticizing the messenger and not the message, this is like saying Rachel Maddow has to right talking about big corportaions not paying their fair share because GE who dodged paying any taxes for the last 4 years is a minority owner of MSNBC.
Focus on the message and stop being lame.
Big K & R
|
David Sky
(586 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-25-11 10:01 AM
Response to Original message |
4. More food for the paranoid. I have to ask these questions: |
|
Edited on Sun Sep-25-11 10:02 AM by David Sky
Do the police have the right to follow a suspect's car by actually driving around behind him/her?
What if the driver appears to be driving as if intoxicated?
Do they have the right to stake out a suspect's home and keep an eye on who comes and goes?
What if that home is the location of a suspected prostitute or drug dealer?
Can law enforcement do those two things WITHOUT a warrant?
If so, what's different about using technology to assist law enforcement in doing those tasks at much less cost?
Let's answer those questions before we go any further with this scare tactic.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 05:21 PM
Response to Original message |