Why Senator Clinton?

[aggiesal]

Run time: 07:13 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0icVblxh2dI   Posted on YouTube: October 15, 2007 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: October 16, 2007 By DU Member: aggiesal Views on DU: 1150

 
A must see.
For all Senator Clinton fans and non-fans alike.

[saracat]

1. Fabulous infomative video K and R

[Tigermoose]

2. Now THATs journalism!

You beat me to the post!

The Real News is the real deal. The Real News Network

[lateo]

3. Hooo boy the Hillary supporters aren't gonna like this.

[zazzle]

4. Do Hillary supporters ever asked themselves -

why the DC establi$hment of corporate media and Dems AND Repubs promote Hillary? The corporate media represents corporate interests - not ours.

[newburgh]

5. Why not? I'm sure they have some good excuses to argue all this away...

right?







Hello?

[Bo Bike]

8. You mean Real Baloney News.

Lets take it question by question

#1. Now that you know now what you didn’t know then why did you vote to provide Bush with a pretext to go to war?

She didn’t, this resolution dose not give W a pretext to go to war. The premise of the question is in error. The IWR vote was for an authorization to use force this resolution is not.

#2. Doesn’t this resolution declare the entire Iranian state terrorist?

No. As the amendment states, only the Iranian revolutionary guard. If you wanted to make that stretch then you could but it is irrelevant.

#3. Given that the intelligence leading to the Iraq war was manipulated in favor of war policy why do you believe this intelligence now?

Again irrelevant as the only teeth this resolution has is sanctions and not military action. She has stated that she would not have voted for the original amendment, which contained that type of language. A resolution with military action demands a grater scrutiny, this amendment dose not. So weather you believe the intelligence or not is irrelevant.

#4. Why support an amendment backed by political forces that advocated for the increased use of military force?

Again the premise for this question is flawed, as is this whole Real Baloney News report. This resolution contains no teeth. It cannot be used for a pretext to war. In fact the amendment states that the president must come before congress for authorization before he takes military action against Iran. Under the context of this last question you would run out of bills to vote for if you couldn’t support politician that disagree with your position on any subject. The fact that they support use of military force is irrelevant to the bill at hand.

[Zandor]

6. Another devastating You Tube video

How will Hillary recover?

:eyes:

[Sufficient Voice]

7. Thank you for posting this.

[ginchinchili]

9. Wake up America!

Nominating Hillary would drive all those independents and moderates who are considering allegiance to the Democratic Party away and eventually back to the right. We have to be smarter than that or we deserve more of what we've had this past decade.

[superkia]

10. You cant beat the hypnotic effect of the boob tube.

Looks like Clinton or a republican for the next 4 years, the media has decided what the people see, so we need to make our primary votes for who we want and then just hope that somehow Clinton wins the general election. Either way, the health insurance industry will be just fine and I'm guessing the corporations will be too! I am not too sure about how the people will be because I don't see Clinton or the republicans (except Ron Paul) speaking up for the people. We are so fucked if America doesn't start waking up to the political bullshit that runs our system.