Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newt Gingrich: Gov. Should Allow Terror Attacks To Remind People How Much We Need Them

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Sky Masterson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 07:05 AM
Original message
Newt Gingrich: Gov. Should Allow Terror Attacks To Remind People How Much We Need Them
 
Run time: 01:53
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GO2Dj3LqcaU
 
Posted on YouTube: December 07, 2011
By YouTube Member: Cincinnati911Truth
Views on YouTube: 74
 
Posted on DU: December 08, 2011
By DU Member: Sky Masterson
Views on DU: 8387
 
We should let America be attacked again to keep everyone scared shitless..:eyes:
Refresh | +40 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. What a dickwad. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Swagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. and the audience chortled away.....nutbags
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LynnTTT Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Not so much
I think that they didn't so much chortle as tittered nervously. As in "I can't believe he said that". I keep hoping
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. I agree with your take on it and that's why Gingrich held up his hand at the 1:12 mark
as a subliminal means to stop the negative thought dynamic re: his statement so that he could immediately segue from the political merits of allowing terrorist acts to succeed (whether he was serious or not) into the issue of wiretapping and his proposed role for expanding the FBI.

In short Newt stepped into a pile of cow shit and implored everybody to look at the mushrooms growing out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. That is the right wing's wet dream...a terrified populace
that is easily dominated by a "strong" leader. Democracy is just too...well, too democratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
35. What the "liberally-biased media" forgot to tell people is that
when Sarah Palin pointed out that the conditions in the U.S. were reminiscent of Germany in the 1930s, she meant that her party would be the ones assuming the role of what took over the Fatherland ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. Newt advocating future LIHOP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kalidurga Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. They keep saying the craziest things and people keep voting for them...
Yes, they are down in the polls, but they haven't been sinking in the polls as fast as they should be considering the lunatic positions they hold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Its because Fox news and a lot of M$M lie or misconstrue the issues.
Local media outlets only parrot what the bigger parent "national/ world" news says... So, if you only get your news from the local station and a 1/2 hour of world news... Or your viewing is of Fox news only, then you won't be informed.. And how many places does one walk into, and the only channel on is Fox News. So, you are sitting waiting for your oil change, tire change, Dr office, AM continental breakfast at a hotel, the airport ( you get the drift), and you are only listening to the Fox News channel... And you are waiting so its boring, and the wrinkly magazine is barely holding your attention, one cannot help but listen to the drivel coming out of the anchor person's mouth... Even MSNBC is just drivel and talking points until about 8pm.

If all you hear are lies about the Democrats, and that's all the news you have caught for most of the week or month, then your opinion of Republicans will be skewed. Think about the housing bubble/ pop that has led us on this latest Recession (Depression).... If all you hear is that Bill Clinton signed away Glass-Stengall, and that Barney Frank, Dodd, and Nancy Pelosi were in co-hoots with Freddie and Fannie Mac that allowed people with no money to be able to buy a home they couldn't afford... And that President Obama was just covering it up by not investigating and not going after the govt owned Freddie and Fannie and just throwing money into the two agencies..... Now, what would you think? The Democrats screwed up the economy. The Democrats pushed the banks into giving out loans to people who shouldn't buy homes. The govt is responsible for the Recession and your job loss and your home foreclosures. They are the enemy. They are the bad guys. The banksters on Wall St were not to blame. They have no responsibility to the continued crisis. Its the govt that is ruining your life. Its not capitalism, lack of regulations, or the derivatives and creative CDO's that seemed to create fake wealth for almost a decade, and in the fall and winter of 2008, the gig was up, and the banks came running to the govt to demand money, or the entire world would crash. And the Depression would be so much more worse than a prolonged Recession.

Fox News and CNN and the early shows on MSNBC are not going to tell its viewers that every type of progressive bill that the House, under the guidance of Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats, passed some of the best legislation that would have allowed us a faster recovery and hire people using Keynesian methods, were completely blocked in the Senate by the Republicans filibustering. I've had debates with Republicans about the Senate republicans stopping legislation from helping American people because they want to remove the President from office so badly. They say, no, the Democrats had the House, Senate, and the Presidency, and they didn't pass anything good or do any investigating of themselves over Freddie and Fannie because they are protecting their involvement of the Recession and housing/ Wall St/ Banker bailouts. When I say that doesn't fly with me because the Senate has spent 3 years now blocking anything and everything that would be good for the American people. They blocked unemployment extensions, they black mailed any type of middle class assistance unless they could have the Bush Tax cuts extended. Then, if they are a bit smarter of a Republican, they say, oh they had 60 votes..... That's when I say, no they did not. Lieberman is an Independent and uses his position as leverage. The DINO's in the Senate are basically no better than Republicans (seriously, Ben Nelson has never met a tax break for millionaires and billionaires that he hasn't liked.. For pete's sake he was a reason Bush got his tax cuts in the first place). So, after they admit a bit that Democrats didn't really have 60 votes to break the filibuster and that Scott Brown came into the fold fairly quickly for much to be done, they start in on the Stimulus fail. That govt doesn't do anything right. Socialism bad. Blah, blah, blah.... you have to explain that the stimulus was only 800 billion, 1/2 of it was tax breaks, it was only good for 2 years to help prop up state govts and do a few shovel ready projects, and that the GDP had lost about 1 or 2 trillion and that 800 billion 1/2 of which was tax breaks (so it takes revenue out of the system by staying in people or corporations pockets... and now after all those tax breaks, the bigger companies are sitting on more money than they ever did when we weren't in "recession" years. Now, we are in year 3, there was NO extra stimulus passed, so now local and state govts are having to cut because the economy still sucks, the housing issues have not been fixed and their are fights between state/ federal/ and banks as to how the fraud and crash should be addressed because the banks don't really own these mortgages. The mortgage is chopped up into bitty pieces and bought up as investment schemes, so we still have a foreclosure mess and neighborhoods and towns being destroyed. The Free Trade agreements have never been examined or fixed to charge a fair tariff for cheap crap coming into the country, and jobs being exported out of the country for a quarterly profit uptake.... And it goes around and around and around.

The fact that money, corporations, lobbyists, and representatives and top govt agency officials are intermarried to one another that they have become completely useless for a govt that is for, of and by the People in a so- called democratic Republic. There is a reason that OWS has had support and success. People hoped for a better govt with the election of President Obama. People got involved. They loved his campaign messages. They loved the idea that the rich pay their fair share, that jobs stopped leaving America, that an actual health care program could be created that would mean everyone might see a Dr if they were sick and be able to be treated for a major illness without going into bankruptcy and losing everything they had worked for their entire lives would be lost due to that illness, and young people who are in debt if they go to college or screwed if they don't with job opportunities of the future would have some actual help. Instead, their parents were laid off, their parents couldn't take out a second mortgage on the home to help out with the costs because the banks won't lend and the home lost its value, and now, they are competing with those parents for entry level positions and the "better" qualified positions they should be entering into, are unavailable because those same parents are now having to work longer because their pension or 401k lost so much value and because they aren't able to receive medicare until the age of 65. Those parents have to hold onto that job for their health care needs... There is hardly a job left where the company would allow for early retirement and continue to cover the retirees on an insurance plan (its just too expensive for that "luxury") AND there has been no "out of the box" type of thinking that would allow for an older person to semi-retire... to go into a position that is quasi "volunteer" work and allow for that person to retain the ability to access health providers and health care in general.

So, if you are scared. Money is tight. The American Dream is crumbling for everyone and looking completely unattainable for children or grandchildren, you are going to get mad. You are right to be mad. However, the people who vote, especially in the off year elections or the tiny local elections that pop up here and there, the general demographic age is going to be older. Those who are older can remember better times. They can remember 1 parent working, a job paying, paid vacation every year, a pension and good health care provided by the company, and the ability to have a decent life with more opportunities for future offspring. They are fearful of this. They are fearful of the fact that they are older, going back to college at the current costs to retrain seem ridiculous at the age of 50 or 55, people all around you are losing their jobs or being cut back, losing the health care because the company can't afford it, watching their children and grandchildren struggle to work 2 or 3 jobs to provide food on the table, and homes foreclosing all over the neighborhood.... When they turn on the news (which is supposed to be truthful and factual and NOT lie), and its telling you Democrats and Obama and Pelosi and the govt in general is to blame for causing the mess of a country you are facing, then its easy for them to be hoodwinked into thinking that Republicans might be the answer now... And who else do they have to turn to? If the Democrats couldn't do the job of making life a bit easier (just providing the Public Option in the mandated buying of health insurance or extending tax breaks to people making less, but making those with more money help pay for the things needed now or to provide no-interest loans to college students or to prosecute someone on wall st for breaking America, instead of handing them an unwarranted bonus with their tax money), then they have no choice but to look towards the only other party there is.... And the Tea Baggers, while racist looking at times, were also talking about creating jobs, jobs, jobs... And that's all people right now care about. Of course, they now have learned they have no one to turn to because as soon as the Tea Baggers took office, they start yammering the same shit about tax cuts (for the wealthy) and de-regulate (which caused the bank/ housing/ Wall St crap in the first place to occur) and stop Obama and the Dems (keep their jobs over American's needing jobs), deficit reduction (cutting social security and medicare), and taking votes on social bs issues like abortion (which very few are focused on and which the country supports allowing women to choose for themselves.. these jack asses are now elevating the dumb ass fight against women to try and include birth control as a form of abortion)....

OWS has everyone in the pile and is resonating with those who aren't watching Fox news. I think more people are tuning those people out.. Shoot, one could learn more about the truth from reading a tweet or a Facebook posting than they could from any media outlet. The Republicans overreached big time. AND many Democrats look like they are just as phony and bought out. The police actions agains kids camping in a park to use their first amendment right to protest the actions of the govt and large corporations and wealthy assholes, has actually brought more attention to their cause. Older people don't really like to see their kids, who finally have gotten off the computer/ out the door to involve themselves in a movement, and they are being beaten down like its the Civil Rights actions all over again. Those who are now entering into their older years who were a part of the 60's and the anti-war, Civil Rights actions, rights for women, etc, are now seeing the images of police crackdowns for protesting agains the govt and corporation collusion. Occupy has done so much for moving the entire conversation away from the bs of deficit reduction and the idea that "we all have to tighten our belts" when for the past few decades, the belt has gotten so tight, its wrapped around the body 2 or 3 times.... and then the wealthy asses who broke the entire system, are given bonuses and still retain 5 or 6 homes, while we are losing the only 1 we have. Thank God people around the world are beginning to wake up. Its going to be a fight for the power, but we have 99%... and that means more of us than them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
45. 10K+
The only ones who should be tightening their belts are the fat cats who are engorged on tax dollars looted from the Treasury. OWS changed everything.
Pox blatant propaganda provides cover for the corporate media that is more subtle and thus more dangerous as more people are unwittingly duped by them.
The Pox audience is essentially fearful ignorant bigots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm not sure when this nut says this;
But he does say Bush should have done this deed. At least he did not mention Clinton.

This is ALMOST as crazy of his explanation of his history of adultery, "I love my country so much that I felt is was my patriotic duty to cheat on my wives."

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. LIHOP?
Newt thinks govt should be a protection racket run by sociopaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. "Keeping America Scared"
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
37. No joke. This is almost directly out of "V for Vendetta".
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
civilisation Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. what a fascist,. is he wearing jackboots?
The all powerfull anti-terrorist police that answer only to Newt,. yeah great idea.

How about not building a global empire on the backs of the people of the world? Perhaps not having 1000 military bases outside of the "homeland" (what nazi holdovers these guys are) would not generate groups of people that want to hurt you in retaliation, from all over the world. Sad lot these RW reThugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. He sounds like a Nazi
Edited on Thu Dec-08-11 08:36 AM by JJW
And he is now leading in the Republikan primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
46. What do you mean
"sounds like a Nazi?" Goering's illegitimate grandson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LynnTTT Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. An impulsive mind...is a scary thing
The fact that an impulsive, shallow thinker like Gingrich can come up with a dangerous "think outside the box" alternative to actually fighting terrorism is frightening. If he's President, we can expect a high state of alert, fascist quasi-military government for years to come. Always afraid, always vigilent, always paranoid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
13. WTF does Newt think Homeland Security is? What a fucking tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
14. hmm, a FBI with a free rein to do what it wants as long as they are preventing terrorism
What could possible go wrong with that?:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TMED Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
15. This title is completely misleading
He said "it's almost as if the government should allow terrorist attacks".

He was simply underscoring his point that successful interdiction leads people to question (what he perceives as) the need to do massive surveillance, etc.

Isn't there enough bad, real stuff about Gingrich, to not have to make things up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sky Masterson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Nothing made up here
Sorry you view it that way
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. defending the newt?
LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Not really, but it is best to listen to his warped thinking
to see how this thought plays out. It really is about fear being one of the most important factors in keeping the voters in check. The repuke idea of playing the population as dummies and dupes is launched again and again in his and his colleagues' comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. Do you agree with him, that it's "almost as if" the government
should allow attacks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TMED Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-11 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #31
50. Since you seem incapable of interpreting the meaning and purpose
of what he said (along with just about everybody else on this thread), what's the point of my answering your question? You'd be better off trying to figure out what he meant by his words.

It seems that the mental giants that are commenting on this thread believe that Gingrich would have preferred that the government not have prevented terrorist attacks. I.e., it appears that most people commenting on this thread have been duped by it's title, as opposed to understanding what Gingrich actually said.

I guess, also, that some people like being duped, as long as it allows them to wallow in their hatred. Kind of like Democratic versions of ditto-heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
41. "it's almost as if the government should allow terrorist attacks"
What sane candidate would even go near such a statement????

It's "almost as if" he's completely unqualified and nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
17. The very picture of a 'pompous ass'.
The people listening to him, applauding him? Worse than he is because their gullibility. "He is a smart man."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. this freedom hating asshole is the best they have?
pathetic
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. It's been done already...
9/11/2001
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's PNAC dogma. Why shouldn't he say it?
It's only shocking to naive liberals, and I'd think a month or so on DU would cure naivete pretty well.

And look how well it worked the first time. There are STILL people claiming that no one in the US gave any support to the 9-11 attackers, and they're still gutting our laws based on 9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gussmith Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. The Man is a Menace
Aren't the Rethugs supposed to be saying things like: "To really send messages we should cancel government". More pestilence, traffic accidents, poverty, lawlessness, all those things that government regulates they would want to dimish...for our own good. Can't the thugs be consistent??
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
24. Other than W., is there a more worthless piece of shit in the gop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Karl Rove wins that accolade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
marias23 Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
27. Anyone who votes for Gingrich is crazier
than he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
28. Which is why Cheney was so cool with the 9/11 attacks
How would we ever have consented to Homeland "Security" otherwise?

Repressive regimes love that word, "security."


Комитет государственной безопасности, "Komityet Gosudarstvennoi Bezopasnosti" Committee of State Security (USSR)
Securitate (Romania)
Ministerium fr Staatssicherheit: Ministry for State Security (East Germany)

"Secure" countries, one and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nolabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
30. "And then...and then...no wait, listen, here's what....we'll have the super secret FBI!"
The man has the grandiosity and impulse control of a three year old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
32. OMG! This is the best the GOP can do? Newt campaigns on platform of "I'll give you another 9/11!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
33. Allow them? Hell, why don't they just go whole hog and do it themselves?
:tinfoilhat:

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
34. and then he and Faux and the rest of the (allegedly) "liberally-biased media"
would be all over Obama for "not keeping America safe" ...

Of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
scentopine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
36. He may seem nuts, but the democrats are scrambling to move even more to the right
to counter shit like this. Instead of coming out aggressively attacking Gingrich for what he is - a dangerous, insipid lunatic - democratic leadership gives him credibility by remaining silent. That's because Dems quiver in fear (YOU WANT PRESIDENT BACHMANN????), inching more and more to the right to meet Gingrich in the so-called "center".

Republicans send out the shock and awe troops to desensitize us, soften us up, and democrats just follow in the slip stream.

Gingrich should be crushed by every single democrat who has any leadership position even the smallest capacity.

That won't happen because the dem party doesn't want to disturb their base, the Reagan republicans.

Democrats are happy to let the republicans set the course for the nation, while positioning Obama as the great savior of neo-lib/neo-con politics circa 1980. Obama has brought stability to right wing leadership after Bush's failure. He did it the old fashioned way, Obama did it by sending rich people trillions of cash directly and indirectly via energy policy, bailouts, tax breaks, outsourcing to Asia, tax credits, and a refusal to prosecute the perpetrators of Wall Street crimes that sent the world into economic ruin.

Right wingers in both parties are winning with ruthless efficiency. That leaves about 300 million of us (only counting the US) as losers.





Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. That won't happen
Quick! Somebody tell Pelosi!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
38. THat's not an unprecedented sentiment
I seem to remember, eight or nine years before 9/11, hearing local right wingers talk about how our nation needed to be attacked in order to harden the American character and put us back on a military footing towards the world. I don't remember exactly what was said, but talk like this doesn't surprise me. It's just that after 9/11 it's more obviously in bad taste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
patrick t. cakes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
39. wow (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
40. That's not even close to the most outrageous thing he says in that video.
The most outrageous thing he said was to form an elite anti terrorist FBI unit with extraordinary powers to violate civil liberties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
43. He knows nothing. He's a real fool.Republicans talk out of their a**'s
with complete confidence. It's amazing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
44. Why haven't we been attacked since 9/11? "I dunno"
Well, I do.

Because, when Bush was selected as prez, Ben Laden KNEW they'd be not just looking the other way, but coddling and kissing Saudis. So he took 9 months to get his ducks in order, and he made a successful attack, because he was right about the Bushies and knew just what they would be, or not be, doing, unlike Clinton.... who was too watchful. And their attack was so successful, because Ben Laden also knew just how the Bushies would react. The 9/11 attacks are STILL wrecking the nation. Who needs to attack again? It's STILL working...

...as this moron Newty proves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
47. O my, he is side stepping the fact that we were warned several times that 9-11
was going to happen and Bush ignored it... Plain and simple they got attacked because they allowed it.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
48. Way to go Newtie!!! You JACKASS!!!
What better way to say: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWS-FoXbjVI&feature=player_embedded">America - Fuck Yeah!!!!!!

- Whichever of these Repuke clowns is still standing at the end, all Obama need do is run their own commercials and show self-promoting, asinine ''book reviews'' like this. Then let them be defeated by their own words.........

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-11 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
49. Who the F does he think he is? asking US to beg for HIS help????
What a douchebag.

:grr::grr::grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-11 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
51. Newt needs to get out of Tiffany's more often -- !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
2QT2BSTR8 Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-11 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
52. Newt Gingrich: Gov. Should Allow Terror Attacks To Remind People How Much We Need Them
Edited on Fri Dec-09-11 02:18 AM by 2QT2BSTR8
Ummmm, hey Newt. It's almost as if the government should have prevented 911. Nothing like trying to ratchet up the fear factor.

edit: spelling error
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DesertDiamond Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-11 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
53. I'm pretty sure they already have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-11 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
54. That is some scary shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul 18th 2024, 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC