Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Clinton becomes heated over voter lawsuit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:57 AM
Original message
Bill Clinton becomes heated over voter lawsuit
 
Run time: 04:09
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uthdea6X2PE
 
Posted on YouTube: January 17, 2008
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: January 17, 2008
By DU Member: BeyondGeography
Views on DU: 2553
 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gaiilonfong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. He is a disgace to the Democatic Party
behaving like that.....History will NOT be kind to him over this no matter who wins the nomination. Imagine if Poppy Bush did this during the primaries for Dumbya, thius place would have gone nuclear.
Former presidents don't behave like this, but of course...well....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. He should act more like Reagan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaiilonfong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Did you get that quote from Taylor Marsh DLC operative?
Sure sounds like it....
When you Clinton shills can't counter with facts you use spin and propaganda to counter....
UNBELIEVABLE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Just another note from the Rovian Playbook, KKKarl is letting them borrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Boy oh boy, talk about not understanding what someone said
He said that reagan brought in a new era in politics. He didnt say that it was a good change, but that it was a change in the political landscape.

What about what Obama said is untrue?

If obama wins the nomination and the presidency, it will be a new era also.

If clinton wins it will usher in a new era too...

Jesus, stop looking to divide the party!!!! This election is too important! Stick to the issues!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. I think Obama is rolling out his comments strategically...
I saw what Obama did this with his comments he made about not being "A CEO".

I feel that he's baiting his opponents, in particular, Hillary.

He throws out a general statement that is easy low-hanging fruit for his competitors. He
makes the statement in a general sense, then banks on his opponents attacking and he comes
back with a more-detailed, reasonable extrapolation of his original statement that sounds
wonderful and reasonable. BAM! His opponents look like whiny, attack-dog jerks--and Obama
was just provided with a platform to look "above the fray".

I think it's brilliant from a political/PR perspective.

Look at his "I'm no CEO" comment. He made those comments several hours before a major debate!!
Just as planned, Hillary had her response talking points all crafted. She said that it was
important to run a bureaucracy and that an inability to do so---was why Bush was so awful. She
thought she had a zinger!

Obama is doing the same thing again. He made general, but vague statements about Reagan. Now, the
Clinton camp (like Pavlovian dogs) will salivate all over the comments and get their surrogates
to express their ire and their hysterical comebacks.

Then, Obama will part the curtain, stand at the microphone and calmly state that he believes that Reagan
ushered in a new era of politics and was the inspirational leader who moved an entire nation into a new
paradigm. Obama will say, ...I want to be that kind of President on the Democratic side, fostering a
movement of hope, change, economic growth, ending the war, etc.

Obama will look poised, rational and like he was just attacked---and the attackers will look foolish.

I like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
40. Thats what you think.. The fact that Obama would even consider using Reagan's
name in a campaign speech sent shock waves of horror and disbelief throughout Democratic enclaves.

Get a grip! People aren't as stupid as you seem to think and as easily duped by a smile and Gomer Pylesque Politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. Here's the thing...
Obama never said that he agreed with Reagan's policies.

He said that Reagan was able to create a major shift in American politics, and
change course.

He's talking about the IMPACT of a President, not his platform.

That is why I still believe that Obama will further explain---after all of the
yip dogs are finished expressing their outrage and ill-informed opinions.

Do you not think that Obama understood what his comments would do?

People are having a knee-jerk reaction to what he said. It's almost certain
that this is what happens, because the public in general is so reactionary
and so hysterical these days. A person can count on it.

We'll see a more detailed explanation, and Obama will end up looking like
the winner.

Those who want to pain this as Obama's endorsement of Reagan and Reagan's
agenda have an agenda or they have a listening issue--or both.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Maybe he should have cried like Poppy Bush did
and had to leave the stage ,while talking about his boys. Guess History would be kinder to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bill really, really, really wants to move back into the White House!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. considering he's part of the system why would you expect anything less?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. Heated because they are going to lose the lawsuit HE BROUGHT against Nevada
And only because they are going to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. What an overblown story. I did not see him "heated"
Dang the media spins, the lemmings fall into place with their faux outrage. Clinton was a great president. The ugliness on DU to so easily condemn the democrat's best makes me really wonder what your agendas are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rAVES Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Yea... Overblown... an afront to democracy is all it is.. we should be use to it by now
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
38. Come on
I admit that Clinton was a spell binding charismatic person, who was able to make people like him, even when they knew better. I remember the great job he did giving the SOTU a few days after the Lewinsky mess broke. He was incredible. To do that in the midst of what had to be a strange time behind the scenes was unexpected by the media and impressive.

But you have to concede this is not Bill Clinton at his best. The weight of the vote is not 5 times higher, it will depend on the number of people who caucus in each place. The other question it raises is that it might have been more appropriate had the suit addressed the weights - if that was the problem, rather than working to suppress the vote.

Here he looks angry, and like a bully to a local reporter who was likely intimidated by the Former President. This is not a one time occurrence. There was Chris Wallace, the time he spoke of swiftboating, when it wasn't, and "fairy tale." Thia is happening enough that it will make people see him differently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. he was a bully in the clip you saw
did you catch his first sentence "You asked with animosity so I'll respond in kind (yea i'm parahprasing"

Great how we can so easily fall into the trap of seeing only what we're told, hearing only what they want. . .its like animal farm "four legs good, for legs bad er no four legs better"

C'mon democrats bitched for 8 years that we need to "stand up and fight" then the moment someone does we through out these insults and grand statements?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Some of the tapes showed the question asked
The Clinton campaign had said it was neutral. The reporter actually asked if the campaign would take a stronger position AGANIST the suit. Both the question and the tone did not seem to reflect animosity. I do realize that it could be edited, but there was more than one version from slightly different angles as I think multiple stations covered it.

Disenfranchising voters is not what we want Democrats to stand up for. Why didn't the suit target the formula, not the sites? Why did no one care for almost 10 months?

Clinton doesn't represent the wing of the party that has stood up to Bush. He fought those who did stand up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petepillow Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oh I didn't think it was all that bad.
He has a strong opinion about something, he doesn't HAVE to be Mr. Congenial anymore, and he's speaking his mind. Maybe he has a point. Maybe it's a load of crap. I don't know. But it's a shame that every time Bill shows a little anger about something, ANYTHING, it's portrayed as a big fat hairy whiny deal. Personally, I like to see politicians let down their guard and have a feeling. Straying from the script is a bonus these days for us viewers at home.

:popcorn:

I am not a supporter of Hillary, but I do think that both of them have a place in the next administration. I'm sure John Edwards or Dennis Kucinich can utilize those Clinton strengths as the nation recovers from this 8 year trainwreck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. Wow, is that heated?
I'm sorry, but Bill's reaction is being overblown. Typical media - looking for any thing negative to go on Bill. No one has been a bigger asshole to the media than the Chimperor, and the MSM never portrays him in a negative light in his relations with them.

Way overblown, and typical Clinton hatred. And by the way, I am definitely no Hillary supporter. The MSM just loves to try to bring down Bill at every opportunity, and they will manufacture ways in which to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NavyDavy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. agreed and for Obama supporters to attack the Big Dog that
ways is bs sounds more and more like RW tactics to me...IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rAVES Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. are you crazy? this crap stinks to high heavan.. I cant believe Hill supporters..
First its moaning about a recount then lauding the decision to exclude Dennis.. now its this shit... Do you just want your Candidate declared President so you can live in a fucking Dictatorship? (officially)

Unbefuckinglevable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. well doesn't that tell you something?? that many in the dem party are not happy with the clintons?
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 12:09 PM by flyarm
and does that not concern you..in the least?

i knocked on doors in Iowa for Edwards and i can tell you this..the one constant over and over from door to door i heard is..it better not be Hillary or they won't vote.

people better think long and hard about that..there is no middle ground for folks who don't like Hillary..

and i can also tell you this,..at the caucus i worked ..for Edwards...there were 6 tables ( big ) for Edwards..one for Richardson , One for Biden, 2 for Hillary, and 5 for Obama..the Obama people stayed out in the hall and most 99% were very young..but the people there to vote for Hillary..were old women..

there was one man at her tables..1 ....and most were older women with their old mothers..i am talking 70+ in age.

Edwards/Richardson/Biden had almost all the men..working age men..and all white men.


so think about that when you are picking your candidate..

idealism will not win this election..

idealism will not win in the mid west..

idealism will not win in the south

idealism will not take back our white house from the neo cons!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigD_95 Donating Member (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
15. I agree
with Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
17. Are the Clintons going to scream and yell their way into the white house?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
18. Here's ANOTHER example of anti-Clinton bias in the MSM
This SOB reporter had made his mind up what his story was going to be before he asked WJC his question. And said so.

But then Big Dog turned the question around on him and handed him his ass.

Instead of being chagrined or embarrassed, as any true seeker of truth would have been, this "reporter" iwent on and bookended his WJC intervew with his prefabricated "spin" -- closing his segment with the same BS he started it with -- he explained nothing, interpreted nothing, clarified nothing, he just spun like a spider.

Why do these incompetent, half-wingnut, jackanape 'reporters' even bother to ask people questions, since they already know beforehand what story they intend to report?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. I completely agree-Bill handed him his ass
I saw only the very last part and it was on Fox the leadin was that "Clinton got into the face of a local news reporter" :eyes: He was never heated he was cool as a cucumber as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Sure looked that way to me too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. No doubt he understood the rules. He just didn't think they would support someone else. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
20. The only thing I have to add is Bill looks increasingly stressed out and shitty
And I wonder how he would hold up over the next four years of unrelenting smear from the media and abuse from that half of the country that will never tolerate him and his wife. This campaign has been a walk in the park in comparison and he's not handling it well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. That's a ridiculous comment
Barack supporters are sounding increasingly "shitty" if you want to go there. So, any politician makes himself available to the people and when he or she doesn't look like they just walked out of a hairstylist or dressing room, you attack them for their appearance. Give me a break. Oh yeah, and let's vote for Barack because we are so concerned about the former President's health. Stop that.

My choice Kucinich, Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Clarification: I really don't care what happens to him healthwise
and his hair looks great. "Shitty" refers to demeanor, not appearance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. understood
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
22. Well what I expect...
If Hillary does happen to win... Repukes will harrass... harangue her and Bill endlessly looking for some garbage to impeach... and unlike our Milquetoast Congressional Democrats they will likely succeed so we will have a bunch of first.... First Woman POTUS... First former POTUS Spouse...and potentially first impeachment of a POTUS and their Spouse... What a mess.. This is seriously not the right time for Hillary... shame really...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
23. Ah, the smell of schadenfreude is in the air this morning
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
24. Bill caught parsing the "5X" issue again, while reporter explains it.
Kkkarl must have slipped him some koolaid over at Bush's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
25. this was the case in caucus's all over Iowa..so now the Clinton's just figured it out?
bullshit i say.,.

I worked a CAUCUS FOR EDWARDS, in Iowa..as did other volunteers..there wewre 384 people at my caucus..it was worth 9 state delegates...we met another caucus volunteer..who worked a cacus in Iowa who had 36 people at his caucus and that caucus was worth 15 delegates..

the Clintons and the dem party in Nevada knew this was the way it is done..they are full of shit and spin if they say otherwise!

they just never fathomed that Obama would get the nod from the Culinary folks!

or that Edwards would be so close in Nevada..

they are full of horseshit..


and do not even think many from SEIU won't caucus for Edwards..they have a long history..and those folks can't be bullshitted by corporate buyout candidates!

fly

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
26. What utterly unpresidential behavior. I can't believe I ever liked that guy.
And lying about something that so easily could be fact checked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
28. Its not that they lie, its that they lie with such ease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sb5697 Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
29. It's Obama's fault, he planted the reporter!
Just beating some of the pro-Clinton supporters (of which I am not one) to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
31. Is It Just Me, or Does Clinton Look a Bit Frail in this Video?
his face looked a bit gaunt to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Frail but full of himself. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
32. When did Bill become a grumpy old ass?
Yuk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veronica.Franco Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. He has to support his wifey AND behave himself until after the election ...
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 07:16 PM by Veronica.Franco
Gettin' GRUMPY, poor baby .... :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downtown Hound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
43. I would hardly call that heated
But he is being a dickhead. Change the rules when you don't like the outcome of a game. Weak and cowardly. I expect better from Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC