(Flashback) NBC's Shuster mocks woman who criticized Chris Matthews

[marcellobarrios]

Run time: 03:30 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9aSJfPKegc   Posted on YouTube: February 09, 2008 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: February 09, 2008 By DU Member: marcellobarrios Views on DU: 1672

 
You may not remember when David Shuster recently mocked a female guest of The View show when she disagreed with Chris Matthews' comments that Hillary Clinton owed being senator and presidential candidate to his husband having slept around.

Doesn't that impersonation strike you as immature? Shuster looks like an 8 year old kid here. You have to see it.

His comments can be seen at 02:42

[grasswire]

1. stop it now

David Schuster is the best friend we've had in the media next to Keith Olbermann, for several years now.

Lay off. Stop it. Now.

Someone wants to get rid of this fine investigative reporter. I wonder why? Who's behind this?

[marcellobarrios]

3. Having done good things in the past does not justify his occassional idiotic behavior

And having done a good job in the Libby case does not give him a free pass to be a moron.

[grasswire]

8. and a mistake does not invite piling on

Your attack is transparent.

[DJ13]

4. They cant stop

Like the Republicans that went after Bill in the 90's the Hillary supporters seem to thrive on hate and diviseness.

Imagine another 4 years (or more) of these kinds of people thinking they must attack anyone who dares utter the wrong thing about "their" President.

I think Im going to be sick......
:puke:

[grasswire]

6. I don't think the OP is a Hillary supporter

Look at the post count.

[marcellobarrios]

10. Shooting the messenger? n/t

How about commenting on Shuster's immature immitation of that lady?

[durrrty libby]

9. So if he were racist rather than sexist, would you still protect him?

Maybe I don't want to listen to people screaming "racist" for the next 4 years

"Imagine another 4 years (or more) of these kinds of people thinking they must attack anyone who dares utter the wrong thing about "their" President."

I think I'm going to be sick" Yeah ..me too

[durrrty libby]

5. What if he were racist rather than sexist? Would you still

protect him?

[grasswire]

7. If apples were oranges, would they be grapefruit?

Your question is ludicrous.

[durrrty libby]

11. No .......your denial is moronic.

[AX10]

14. Living in denial, are you...

:eyes:

[liberalmike27]

18. I agree completely

If you are mad at Schuster, you've not been paying attention to the content of his bits. Besides, he obviously didn't mean Chelsea was screwing for delegate votes. Sorry, I know the video was different, but I'm listening to stephanie miller.

[Supersedeas]

20. I'm sure David does want to be remembered as a Tweety fanboy

[madeline_con]

2. Olbermann apologized for it tonight on his show. n/t

[durrrty libby]

12. It's like a nasty virus that has infected the entire network

Have you read this
http://mediamatters.org/items/200802080012?f=h_top

[dchill]

13. Hmmmm... How about...

you go back where you came from?

[itsrobert]

15. LOL, THAT WAS HILARIOUS

Thanks for posting. Shuster is great. He pegged the women on the View very good.

[Marie26]

16. What a jerk

Is there something in the water at MSNBC? The funniest part to me is that Joy Behar was totally right, while Schuster was totally wrong. When she said that Matthews' bashing could inspire a backlash among women, the respected journalist rolled his eyes at her "political opinion" and mocked her. But Matthews' comments did inspire a backlash among women, one that pundits like Schuster didn't see coming at all.

[defendandprotect]

17. Absolutely correct --- though I don't see why anyone is watching the

"Joe" program . . .

Joy Behar is generally right on --- however, not as sharp or fast as Rosie is ---
and while I like Whoopi on some things I haven't really seen The VIEW, ever --
so don't have much idea of how she's doing there.

According to corporate-media -- whether our front pages or the women you see on TV ---
women are around to clean toilet bowls and show their tits.

We need more "roll eyes" at them ---
And we need women, in general, to take a more forceful stand vs corporate-media ---

[IndieLeft]

19. Give me a break.

I can't believe how much has been made of this. ridiculous.