Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I wonder

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Barack Obama Group Donate to DU
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 05:02 PM
Original message
I wonder
if grantcart is roaming these halls ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. here
Edited on Tue May-06-08 05:39 PM by grantcart
so we have to wait until we see some numbers before we know how to write it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. lol
um ... don't we already know?

:rofl:

Nah, kidding aside, this is a good idea.

2% of Indiana in:
Clinton 61%
Obama 39%
(District 2 ... it was expected to go C)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I predicted Guam 7 votes lol
The thing is we should get a basic idea when the polls close
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yep ...
North Carolina won't close until over an hour from now. So, we have time to think about writing.

Feel free to take time, maybe write something, and maybe meet back here around 8:00 Eastern? (4:00 your time?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Referring to the charts ... terminology
Chart 1:



********************

Chart 2:



********************

Graph 1:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. .
Edited on Tue May-06-08 05:59 PM by grantcart
Utah 1 5/9/2008
Colorado 1 5/17/2008
Kansas 1 5/17/2008
Alaska 1 5/23/2008
Georgia 2 5/24/2008
Wyoming 1 5/24/2008
Hawaii 1 5/25/2008
Mississippi 1 5/31/2008
Maine 1 6/1/2008
Minnesota 2 6/7/2008
Vermont 1 6/7/2008
Montana 1 6/8/2008
Wisconsin 2 6/13/2008
Idaho 1 6/14/2008
Iowa 1 6/14/2008
Virginia 2 6/14/2008
Washington 2 6/15/2008
North Carolina 2 6/21/2008
Oregon 1 6/21/2008
South Dakota 1 6/21/2008
Nebraska 1 6/21/2008


So the add on is for "well known" super delegates is 27



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. ...
I have 27 shown in both Chart 1 and Chart 2, so that works.

We can use your detail in that post to justify the usage of 27 add-ons well-known for Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. We believe that we have a MATHEMATICAL PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Edited on Tue May-06-08 07:08 PM by grantcart
I) Words Matter. Numbers Matter. Having just lived through 8 years of denial its time to show that the Democratic Party is not wishy washy but lives by clear analysis of facts and here are the facts:

< current numbers >


II) We also know that of the remaing super delegates 27 add on Super Delegates that those that come from the following states Obama won decisively he will carry all of these add on delegates

Utah 1 5/9/2008
Colorado 1 5/17/2008
Kansas 1 5/17/2008
Alaska 1 5/23/2008
Georgia 2 5/24/2008
Wyoming 1 5/24/2008
Hawaii 1 5/25/2008
Mississippi 1 5/31/2008
Maine 1 6/1/2008
Minnesota 2 6/7/2008
Vermont 1 6/7/2008
Montana 1 6/8/2008
Wisconsin 2 6/13/2008
Idaho 1 6/14/2008
Iowa 1 6/14/2008
Virginia 2 6/14/2008
Washington 2 6/15/2008
North Carolina 2 6/21/2008
Oregon 1 6/21/2008
South Dakota 1 6/21/2008
Nebraska 1 6/21/2008


We also know that he will get these 7 super delegates when he gets the majority of pledged delegates on May 20th.

Clinton endorsers:
Sen. Maria Cantwell (WA) - most pledged delegates, most states won

Uncommitted:
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (CA) (added 3/30)
Christine Pelosi (CA) (added 3/30)
Gov. Roy Romer (CO) (added 3/30)
Former President Jimmy Carter (GA) (added 5/1)
Betty Richie (TX) (added 3/30)
Denise Johnson (TX) (added 4/6)


III When we add these "Highly Likely Obama Supporters" it means that of the remaining < > super delegates Hillary has to win < >%
Obama needs only < > super delegates or only < >%



IV. Given the trends since Super Tuesday below we find that a Clinton victory is no longer mathematically possible and that an Obama victory is mathematically certain





V. Therefore the members of DU who have added their names below believe that we now have a MATHEMATICAL PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. That while it will take the rest of the world to catch up with reality we don't think that the pretense that there is any rational chance that Senator Obama will not be our nominee should be maintained here.


add names


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. charts added ...
I) Words Matter. Numbers Matter. Having just lived through 8 years of denial its time to show that the Democratic Party is not wishy washy but lives by clear analysis of facts and here are the facts:









II) We also know that of the remaing super delegates 27 add on Super Delegates that those that come from the following states Obama won decisively he will carry all of these add on delegates

Utah 1 5/9/2008
Colorado 1 5/17/2008
Kansas 1 5/17/2008
Alaska 1 5/23/2008
Georgia 2 5/24/2008
Wyoming 1 5/24/2008
Hawaii 1 5/25/2008
Mississippi 1 5/31/2008
Maine 1 6/1/2008
Minnesota 2 6/7/2008
Vermont 1 6/7/2008
Montana 1 6/8/2008
Wisconsin 2 6/13/2008
Idaho 1 6/14/2008
Iowa 1 6/14/2008
Virginia 2 6/14/2008
Washington 2 6/15/2008
North Carolina 2 6/21/2008
Oregon 1 6/21/2008
South Dakota 1 6/21/2008
Nebraska 1 6/21/2008


We also know that he will get these 7 super delegates when he gets the majority of pledged delegates on May 20th.

Clinton endorsers:
Sen. Maria Cantwell (WA) - most pledged delegates, most states won

Uncommitted:
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (CA) (added 3/30)
Christine Pelosi (CA) (added 3/30)
Gov. Roy Romer (CO) (added 3/30)
Former President Jimmy Carter (GA) (added 5/1)
Betty Richie (TX) (added 3/30)
Denise Johnson (TX) (added 4/6)


III When we add these "Highly Likely Obama Supporters" it means that of the remaining < > super delegates Hillary has to win < >%
Obama needs only < > super delegates or only < >%



IV. Given the trends since Super Tuesday below we find that a Clinton victory is no longer mathematically possible and that an Obama victory is mathematically certain




V. Therefore the members of DU who have added their names below believe that we now have a MATHEMATICAL PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. That while it will take the rest of the world to catch up with reality we don't think that the pretense that there is any rational chance that Senator Obama will not be our nominee should be maintained here.


add names
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. ..
1) did you add in the 7 pelosi SDs (and subtract one from Hillary?)

2) are we going to go with actual numbers for IN NC or projected?

3) we need to add the numbers and the percentages into the text
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. ...
1) I'll change my chart from 27 to 34, and -1 for Clinton

2) What do you think about projecting:
NC Obama +14
IN Clinton +8

Or we could wait about an hour until more figures come in, and we have a closer range

3) Once the charts are finished (won't take a few seconds), we can input the numbers and percentages into the text

?

}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Percentages for future pledged delegates
Here's our range.

Pro-Obama ...
Indiana Obama +2 (pledged Obama 37, Clinton 35)
North Carolina Obama +14 (pledged Obama 66, Clinton 49)
Obama needs 10.6% of all remaining pledged delegates to stay ahead
Clinton needs 89.4% of all remaining pledged delegates to catch up

Pro-Clinton ...
Indiana Clinton +10 (pledged Obama 33, Clinton 39)
North Carolina Obama +3 (pledged Obama 60, Clinton 55)
Obama needs 15.2% of all remaining pledged delegates to stay ahead
Clinton needs 84.8% of all remaining pledged delegates to catch up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. well lets wait until the states are called
that will make a big difference on how to frame it.

Also there will be hundreds of threads come out all at once and it will be hard to keep one alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. you bet
you're right, we'll need to keep the post near the top

I'll wait a bit before getting into percentages (except for SD's which I already posted)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. Pct for future SD
Edited on Tue May-06-08 06:13 PM by phrigndumass
After the 27 are figured in ...

NC & IN Pro-Obama:
Clinton needs 210 of 240 superdelegates to win (87.5%)
Obama needs 30 of 240 superdelegates to huck Clinton (12.5%)

NC & IN Pro-Clinton:
Clinton needs 200 of 240 superdelegates to win (83.3%)
Obama needs 40 of 240 superdelegates to huck Clinton (16.7%)

(edited for duh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. something doesn't look right there
the pro clinton scenario has Obama only needing 30 and the pro obama scenario he needs 40
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Oops, I'll edit lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. Obama picks up 1 SD lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. no shit? lol
I see it now ... A DNC from NC. Gotta keep up with these, maybe there'll be more, lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. shit Obama wins NC
Edited on Tue May-06-08 06:30 PM by grantcart
has to be atleast 10 points
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Good GAWD, the fucking polls have been closed for 2 minutes!!
LMAO

What's up with MSNBC ... crazy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. exit polls have a blow out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. I was going to say 'if it is a split then the head line should be
and he won NC BIG


suggested subject for the thread



We believe that we have a MATHEMATICAL PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. you had to edit, lol
They said it was called the moment the polls closed.

We might need to shorten the subject a bit ... will that fit? If it does fit, that's a good subject title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
21. Cnn has already given him 20 delegates in NC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. At this rate (10 minutes after polls close) maybe he'll get all 115
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. DCW has figures in ...
Indiana Clinton 25 to 20 delegates
North Carolina Obama 38 to 33 delegates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. MSNBC hinting at + 15 delegates for Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Yeah, +14 would erase PA
They're saying +10-15 in NC, while IN is getting closer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
23. LOL ... Clinton's argument, it's not the big states anymore, it's the BIGGER states
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. North Carolina isn't big enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. #26 is a draft what do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. 47 or 27
"II) We also know that of the remaing super delegates 47 add on"

should that be 27?

Just pointing that one out, going back to read more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. look at this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. ours will be better
but they're doing this quick in GDP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. well do we know enough to put it together?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. I can project ... what do you think about this:
Project Obama +14 in NC

Project Clinton +8 in IN

It won't take but a second to chart them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. Look at my reply to #26
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. see 38 above
what did you think about the overall layout of the text?

wanted to be brief and firm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Layout of the text is good, replied to 38
brief and firm is the way to go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. out of fairness we can also add '20 well known SDs' for Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. MSNBC is talking about 5/20 and the Pelosi number
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. That would be fair, but it will lower her percentages as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. fair is better and we have plenty of percent to give
just trying to anticipate the objections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. looks like Zogby got it right tonight
oh and where are the 7 Pelosi SDs added in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Okay, take a look at the posts near the top, the charts have magically changed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
47. you there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Yep, take another look at Reply #35, the charts have changed in them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. still confused about the 7 pelosi SDs shouldn't they be added to the well known number?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. I added them, Obama will win the pledged delegates
look at the updated post at the bottom of this thread, whatcha think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
51. We believe that we have a MATHEMATICAL PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
I) Words Matter. Numbers Matter. Having just lived through 8 years of denial its time to show that the Democratic Party is not wishy washy but lives by clear analysis of facts and here are the facts:





**************************



**************************



**************************


II) We also know that of the remaing super delegates 27 add on Super Delegates that those that come from the following states Obama won decisively he will carry all of these add on delegates

Utah 1 5/9/2008
Colorado 1 5/17/2008
Kansas 1 5/17/2008
Alaska 1 5/23/2008
Georgia 2 5/24/2008
Wyoming 1 5/24/2008
Hawaii 1 5/25/2008
Mississippi 1 5/31/2008
Maine 1 6/1/2008
Minnesota 2 6/7/2008
Vermont 1 6/7/2008
Montana 1 6/8/2008
Wisconsin 2 6/13/2008
Idaho 1 6/14/2008
Iowa 1 6/14/2008
Virginia 2 6/14/2008
Washington 2 6/15/2008
North Carolina 2 6/21/2008
Oregon 1 6/21/2008
South Dakota 1 6/21/2008
Nebraska 1 6/21/2008


We also know that he will get these 7 super delegates when he gets the majority of pledged delegates on May 20th.

Clinton endorsers:
Sen. Maria Cantwell (WA) - most pledged delegates, most states won

Uncommitted:
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (CA) (added 3/30)
Christine Pelosi (CA) (added 3/30)
Gov. Roy Romer (CO) (added 3/30)
Former President Jimmy Carter (GA) (added 5/1)
Betty Richie (TX) (added 3/30)
Denise Johnson (TX) (added 4/6)


III When we add these "Highly Likely Obama Supporters" and "Highly Likely Clinton Supporters" it means that of the remaining 214 super delegates Hillary has to win 87.9%
Obama needs only 26 super delegates or only 12.1%.


IV. Given the trends since Super Tuesday below we find that a Clinton victory is no longer mathematically possible and that an Obama victory is mathematically certain





V. Therefore the members of DU who have added their names below believe that we now have a MATHEMATICAL PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. That while it will take the rest of the world to catch up with reality we don't think that the pretense that there is any rational chance that Senator Obama will not be our nominee should be maintained here.


add names

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
52. .
Edited on Tue May-06-08 07:50 PM by grantcart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Cell phone went dead, will try again in a sec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. I'm laughing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Lost ya again ...
I'll change the charts and repost one more time, won't take but a minute or two
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
56. so anyway it looks good to go let me know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
58. We believe that we have a MATHEMATICAL PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
This post is compiled and written jointly by grantcart and phrigndumass


I) Words Matter. Numbers Matter. Having just lived through 8 years of denial its time to show that the Democratic Party is not wishy washy but lives by clear analysis of facts and here are the facts:





**************************



**************************



**************************


II) We also know that of the remaing super delegates 27 add on Super Delegates that those that come from the following states Obama won decisively he will carry all of these add on delegates

Utah 1 5/9/2008
Colorado 1 5/17/2008
Kansas 1 5/17/2008
Alaska 1 5/23/2008
Georgia 2 5/24/2008
Wyoming 1 5/24/2008
Hawaii 1 5/25/2008
Mississippi 1 5/31/2008
Maine 1 6/1/2008
Minnesota 2 6/7/2008
Vermont 1 6/7/2008
Montana 1 6/8/2008
Wisconsin 2 6/13/2008
Idaho 1 6/14/2008
Iowa 1 6/14/2008
Virginia 2 6/14/2008
Washington 2 6/15/2008
North Carolina 2 6/21/2008
Oregon 1 6/21/2008
South Dakota 1 6/21/2008
Nebraska 1 6/21/2008


We also know that he will get these 7 super delegates when he gets the majority of pledged delegates on May 20th.

Clinton endorsers:
Sen. Maria Cantwell (WA) - most pledged delegates, most states won

Uncommitted:
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (CA) (added 3/30)
Christine Pelosi (CA) (added 3/30)
Gov. Roy Romer (CO) (added 3/30)
Former President Jimmy Carter (GA) (added 5/1)
Betty Richie (TX) (added 3/30)
Denise Johnson (TX) (added 4/6)


III When we add these "Highly Likely Obama Supporters" and "Highly Likely Clinton Supporters" it means that of the remaining 214 super delegates Hillary has to win 87.9%
Obama needs only 26 super delegates or only 12.1%.


IV. Given the trends since Super Tuesday below we find that a Clinton victory is no longer mathematically possible and that an Obama victory is mathematically certain





V. Therefore the members of DU who have added their names below believe that we now have a MATHEMATICAL PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. That while it will take the rest of the world to catch up with reality we don't think that the pretense that there is any rational chance that Senator Obama will not be our nominee should be maintained here.


Respectfully submitted,

Grantcart and Phrigndumass


.


If you agree and would like to co-sign this document, please reply below and recommend this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. This is it ... give me the okay or suggest a change
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. Below
looks really good we still need to add 19 for Clinton in the two places for her "likely add ons" and Obama's should be 34

Also can you make the other subject out lines I,II,III,IV in the same bold as V?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
61. When you two get together it's always a party! Thanx. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. LMAO! We need a janitor in this thread to clean up the damn mess!
Papers everywhere, sheesh!

:crazy:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Barack Obama Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC