Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leahy calls for vote on Wiretap policy subpoena

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:08 PM
Original message
Leahy calls for vote on Wiretap policy subpoena
Edited on Tue Jun-12-07 12:15 PM by Perky
From Politico.com

Senate Judiciary Committee to vote on authorizing subpoenas of NSA eavesdropping program


The Senate Judiciary Committee has scheduled a business meeting for Thursday to authorize subpoenas as part of the panel's investigation into the NSA eavesdropping program.

Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) have repeatedly asked Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to turn over any legal opinions and advice the Bush administration has supporting the NSA's warrantless eavesdropping program, which President Bush and other administration officials have called the "Terrorist Surveillance Program."



Gonzales has repeatedly rebuffed those requests, including a May 21 letter to the attorney general from Leahy and Specter. Leahy has recently threatened to take further action to obtain access to the information.

Now, Leahy has scheduled a vote for Thursday to authorize him to subpoena the documents following consultations with Specter. Under Judiciary Committee rules, Republicans can postpone the vote on the subpoena authorizations for a week, but Democratic insiders don't expect Leahy will have any problem gaining approval for the subpoenas at that time.

Leahy's decision to seek subpoena authority signals a dramatic escalation of the fight between Capitol Hill and the White House over the NSA eavesdropping effort, and was spurred by recent testimony by former Deputy Attorney General James Comey that Gonzales and former White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card attempted to persuade ex-Attorney General John Ashcroft to reauthorize the program while hospitalized in early 2004. The effort led to a showdown between the White House and the Justice Dept., and Comey and other senior DOJ officials threatened to resign over the matter. Bush had to personally intervene in the dispute before it was resolved and the eavesdropping program reauthorized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Note to Conyers.
He does not comply Impeach his sorry ass.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Now we are moving to the show down.
This is where the rubber meets the road folks.

Will Justice comply? Not likely.

Don't blink. I want to see the JC go to the mat on this one. It is here we will FINALLY realize and confirm where we stand.

Executive President or a nation of laws not men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good idea. A specific vote about a specific problem. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thursday will be a busy day...
Judge Walton will render his decision on Scooter and this...

Any other goodies set for Thursday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good news, but the cabal will ignore the subpoena too. recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Get ready for another round of stern warnings and statements of disapproval.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. IF THEY DON'T COMPLY, PUT THEM IN 'CUFFS
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE IN A RAGE AT THIS RUN-AWAY TRAIN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. More white noise.
I've ceased to be impressed by the magic word "subpoena". It's proven to be a spell without power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I agree...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. No kidding.
Subpoena? Yawn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
here_is_to_hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wee...another useless vote, another round
of useless subpoena's...yawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yaaaaaaaaaaaaawn. Wake me when ONE of these useless fucks actually DOES something...
...to bring the BFEE to account...

Thanks, until then I'll be over here smacking my head against a wall hoping for a different result each time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. So we get a vote on it
Then what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. A clumsy back-down and an apology to the WH and the Chimperor...
...you know, the usual stuff from the "majority" party...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC