Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Republican wants to restrict Pelosi’s travel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 03:34 PM
Original message
House Republican wants to restrict Pelosi’s travel
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/house-republican-wants-to-restrict-pelosis-travel-2007-06-21.html

House Republican wants to restrict Pelosi’s travel
By Jackie Kucinich
June 21, 2007

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) will not be permitted to use State Department funds to travel to nations that are known to have sponsored terrorism if a Republican amendment to appropriations legislation passes the House on Thursday.

The amendment to the $34 billion State and Foreign Operations bill, offered by Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), prohibits funds to be used to travel to Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan or Syria.

In a “Dear Colleague” letter released earlier today, King said Pelosi had overstepped her constitutional role as Speaker when she traveled to Syria in April.

“Taking her cue from the Iraq Study Group’s recommendation that the U.S. enter into talks with Syria to forge a new way forward in Iraq, Speaker Pelosi decided to ignore the requests of the President that she refrain from traveling to the terrorist state,” the letter said.

King told The Hill that he believed Pelosi was in violation of the Logan Act, a 1799 law signed by President John Adams that prohibits unauthorized U.S. citizens from interfering with relations between the United States and foreign governments.

“I was one of the members of Congress that was incensed the Speaker had taken it upon herself to conduct foreign policy,” he said. “It was a blatant violation of the Logan Act.”

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't it great that a republican is concerned about a blatant violation of anything
Yes king we should continue to allow kindasleazy to conduct foreign policy. She's been so good at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. They don't have the votes for this sham do they?
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Probably some dems will vote for it...thanks to these dems who
are really repugs...I believe this has been the plan all along..we are heading to a one party system...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can she travel to the US?
Bush and Cheney are terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. And what about all those Republicans who went to Syria as well?
Go to hell, King. You fu*kin' hypocrite!

Your President has abused America far more than any other person in the political arena, yet you're willing to let that slide for this? You're a waste of taxpayer money, and a disgrace to the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. KIck @ss, Nancy. When the dogs bark, you know you're winning.
Edited on Thu Jun-21-07 03:39 PM by sfexpat2000
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wasn't there three Republicans there just the week before she arrived?
They are becoming laughing stocks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Steven King is really disgusting
I am definately donating to his opponent in 08.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. can't find the text of the amendment -- but if all it does is restrict state dept funding
for travel, big deal. I suspect it does more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levi3 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. good lord
good lord
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. How about a bill that says companies doing business in Iran can't get US Military contracts?
Halliburton sells nuclear technology to Iran.

Still.

Today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. The mean spirited little prick won't restrict his own travel
of course. I can't believe how petty and vindictive these men are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. But the president can travel to the terror watch list country of Albania?
Bush can but Pelosi can't? Republicans can hob nob with the Syrians but Democrats can't? This is hypocritical nonsense from Congressman King.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-21-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. We could have saved a bundel if they'd passed a law keeping...
Fat Hastret out of the Golden Corral for those five meals a day he ate. Three meals a day is plenty for the taxpayers to have paid for. We was robbed all them years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC