Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Reconfigures the Way Casualty Totals Are Given

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 10:55 AM
Original message
U.S. Reconfigures the Way Casualty Totals Are Given
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/latestnews/index.php?id=9143

February 5th, 2007 2:33 am
U.S. Reconfigures the Way Casualty Totals Are Given

By Denise Grady / New York Times

Statistics on a Pentagon Web site have been reorganized in a way that lowers the published totals of American nonfatal casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Dr. Michael Kilpatrick, deputy director of force health protection and readiness at the Defense Department, said the previous method of tallying casualties was misleading and might have made injuries and combat wounds seem worse and more numerous than they really were.

The old method lumped many problems under the label “casualties,” including illnesses, minor injuries and injuries from accidents, as well as wounds sustained in combat. But the public may assume that every casualty is a war wound, Dr. Kilpatrick said, so the site was changed to avoid misunderstandings.

On Monday, the bottom line of the Defense Department’s Web page on casualties in Iraq listed a total of 47,657 “nonmortal casualties.”

By Tuesday, the same page no longer showed a total for nonmortal casualties. The bottom line is now “total — medical air transported,” and the figure is 31,493.

The new total excludes 16,164 troops who were wounded but did not require medical air transport because their injuries were minor. The total does include combat wounds, nonhostile injuries and diseases serious enough for medical transport.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TerdlowSmedley Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. New "pound of flesh" criteria for designation as casualty.
Anything falling below the one-pound of lost body tissue as a result of battle injury would be classified as "mental health day."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. sniff ... sniff... hmmmmm
this sort of smells like

BULLSHIT

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. .... scanning ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. They had to prepare...
...for the horrendous numbers that will be coming in the following
weeks and months.

Junior, and the rest of the neocon jerks--just sent in 20,000 additional
US soldiers into the heart of a civil war. OUr government understands very
well that our soldiers are sitting ducks in the middle of an un-winnable,
situation. Furthermore, BushCo announced that he was doing this--a few weeks
ago. This gives the insurgents and other violent groups plenty of time to
prepare for the arrival of US troops.

It's going to get really ugly, and I weep for our troops.

They're re-defining the statistics--before the numbers shoot up--so
they can hide the horrendous consequences of their reckless decisions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fuzzy math...
now where did they get that concept?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC