WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-05-07 02:38 PM
Original message |
New Polls for IA caucus and NH primary (both Dem/GOP) |
|
Iowa Clinton 35% Edwards 18% Obama 14% Vilsack 12% Biden 2% Clark 2% Kucinich 2% Dodd 1% Richardson 1% Und: 13%
In Iowa 39% of women favor Clinton compared to 30% of men. Among voters who have attended a previous caucus the race is closer with Clinton edging Edwards 29-25 percent. Among those who say 2008 would be their first caucus Clinton leads 44% to Vilsack's 17% with Obama at 12% and Edwards at 7%.
NH: Clinton 39% Obama 19% Edwards 13% Clark 2% Richardson 2% Biden 1% Dodd 1% Kucinich 1% Undecided 21%
43% of NH Democratic women support Clinton compared to 30% of men.
GOP (Iowa) Giuliani 27% McCain 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 11% Huckabee 2% Bowntack 1% Tancredo 1% Undecided 15%
NH (GOP) McCain 27% Giuliani 20% Romney 20% Gingrich 11% Undecided 15%
www.americanresearchgroup.com
|
Miss Chybil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-05-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message |
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-05-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Same polling group numbers for Dec 2006 |
|
Democrats IA NH Biden 2% 1% Clark 1% 2% Clinton 31% 27% Dodd 2% 1% Edwards 20% 18% Gravel 1% - Kerry 2% 6% Kucinich 5% 4% Obama 10% 21% Richardson 1% 2% Vilsack 17% 1% Undecided 8% 17%
Clinton is trending up. Edwards appears to be holding steady(going up in NH). Obama is the reverse holding steady but going up in IA. Vilsack took a hit if only because he is losing grounbd in his home state. Kucinich took a small hit.
Outside of the big 3 it appears there is trouble early in gaining traction but this is very very early so changes can happen and usually do so rapidly. In 6 months, one of these 2nd tier candidates could make a big push.
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-05-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. of course 'trending up' has a great deal to do with the recent media blitz for her announcement |
|
After a month or so and see where the races are at that point. Edwards had a similar bump after his blitz in Iowa when he announced.
|
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-05-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Ehhh she just visited the state for the 1st time so as you said bump is expected |
|
ARG seems to be an outlier poll though I think you can attempt to spot trends by comparing other polls done by them.
" After a month or so and see where the races are at that point. "
I am attempting with great difficulty to keep the horse race analysis to 2 or 3 times a month ;-)
|
sandrakae
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-05-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. Vilsack should have done better in Iowa. |
|
I am just not ready to jump on the Hillywagon. Edward's does not have a snow balls chance in Hell of getting my primary vote. I am taking a strong look at Vilsack. I sent his campaign website a list of questions. I am waiting to hear back.
|
LSparkle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-05-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Wow -- what happened to Edwards' lead in Iowa? |
|
Hillary was only there ONE WEEKEND and she's already up by that much????
|
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-05-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. You have to compare the polls from the same polling group for consistency |
|
There are alot of polls out showing either Clitnon or Edwards in the lead.
In Dec 2006 (the last poll they have) ARG had Clinton at 31% so the jump is not that large.
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-05-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. If you look at among previous caucus-goers Hillary only leads by 4-pts |
|
and frankly they are probably the most committed to actually turn out--the Dean camp learned that in '04.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 07:08 PM
Response to Original message |