Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Polls for IA caucus and NH primary (both Dem/GOP)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 02:38 PM
Original message
New Polls for IA caucus and NH primary (both Dem/GOP)
Iowa
Clinton 35%
Edwards 18%
Obama 14%
Vilsack 12%
Biden 2%
Clark 2%
Kucinich 2%
Dodd 1%
Richardson 1%
Und: 13%

In Iowa 39% of women favor Clinton compared to 30% of men. Among voters who have attended a previous caucus the race is closer with Clinton edging Edwards 29-25 percent. Among those who say 2008 would be their first caucus Clinton leads 44% to Vilsack's 17% with Obama at 12% and Edwards at 7%.

NH:
Clinton 39%
Obama 19%
Edwards 13%
Clark 2%
Richardson 2%
Biden 1%
Dodd 1%
Kucinich 1%
Undecided 21%

43% of NH Democratic women support Clinton compared to 30% of men.

GOP (Iowa)
Giuliani 27%
McCain 22%
Gingrich 16%
Romney 11%
Huckabee 2%
Bowntack 1%
Tancredo 1%
Undecided 15%

NH (GOP)
McCain 27%
Giuliani 20%
Romney 20%
Gingrich 11%
Undecided 15%

www.americanresearchgroup.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Vedy interestink! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Same polling group numbers for Dec 2006
Democrats IA NH

Biden 2% 1%
Clark 1% 2%
Clinton 31% 27%
Dodd 2% 1%
Edwards 20% 18%
Gravel 1% -
Kerry 2% 6%
Kucinich 5% 4%
Obama 10% 21%
Richardson 1% 2%
Vilsack 17% 1%
Undecided 8% 17%

Clinton is trending up. Edwards appears to be holding steady(going up in NH). Obama is the reverse holding steady but going up in IA. Vilsack took a hit if only because he is losing grounbd in his home state. Kucinich took a small hit.

Outside of the big 3 it appears there is trouble early in gaining traction but this is very very early so changes can happen and usually do so rapidly. In 6 months, one of these 2nd tier candidates could make a big push.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. of course 'trending up' has a great deal to do with the recent media blitz for her announcement
After a month or so and see where the races are at that point. Edwards had a similar bump after his blitz in Iowa when he announced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Ehhh she just visited the state for the 1st time so as you said bump is expected
ARG seems to be an outlier poll though I think you can attempt to spot trends by comparing other polls done by them.

" After a month or so and see where the races are at that point. "

I am attempting with great difficulty to keep the horse race analysis to 2 or 3 times a month ;-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandrakae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Vilsack should have done better in Iowa.
I am just not ready to jump on the Hillywagon. Edward's does not have a snow balls chance in Hell of getting my primary vote. I am taking a strong look at Vilsack. I sent his campaign website a list of questions. I am waiting to hear back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow -- what happened to Edwards' lead in Iowa?
Hillary was only there ONE WEEKEND and she's already up by that much????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You have to compare the polls from the same polling group for consistency
There are alot of polls out showing either Clitnon or Edwards in the lead.

In Dec 2006 (the last poll they have) ARG had Clinton at 31% so the jump is not that large.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. If you look at among previous caucus-goers Hillary only leads by 4-pts
and frankly they are probably the most committed to actually turn out--the Dean camp learned that in '04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC