|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
AlGore-08.com (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 10:40 PM Original message |
Am I the only one who expects the Harriet Myers subpoena fight to end up in the Supreme Court? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlackHawk706867 (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yep it probably will go that route and the decision will come down to ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
2. That's why it's INSANE that they're not seeking dual impeachment of both Dick and Bush nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
3. Congress of course will lose if it goes to the SCOTUS, unless Larry Flynt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countmyvote4real (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. * has made the DOJ a joke all the way up to the SCOTUS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
5. If they charge them with inherent contempt of Congress, it never goes to court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 11:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. I hope Congress skips the Republican dominated Courts and tries the case itself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 01:37 AM Response to Reply #6 |
16. A serious contempt on Gonzales part could constitute a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlGore-08.com (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 11:40 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Anything can go to court, it's up to each court to decide if a case has enough merit to be heard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:45 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. The Congress could reply as Andrew Jackson did: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
8. Not the only one by a long site. And the corrupt and lawless "Supreme" "Court" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-11-07 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
9. It's unlikely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlGore-08.com (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:08 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Bush has never shied away from Constitutional Crises |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
11. Call their bluff--let's let the Supreme Court declare a dictatorship a year out from elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:23 AM Response to Original message |
12. We need to start talking publicly about Roberts recusing self. I believe he promised that he would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
13. Imagine this with Harriet Miers on the Supreme Court - - !!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
15. Whats got to happen is that congress simply can't let bush get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC