|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:34 AM Original message |
What underlying shady reason does Cindy Sheehan have for running against Nancy Pelosi? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
1. Obviously she hates America. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:37 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. It's reverse psychology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:38 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. No, she hates her own impotence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:39 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Pelosi? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:14 AM Response to Reply #1 |
46. Yes, Pelosi can click her ruby slippers together, and end the war today at 3 EST |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:18 AM Response to Reply #46 |
56. Or, she could have cut the funding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:38 AM Response to Reply #56 |
74. She wanted to, and didn't have the votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:14 PM Response to Reply #74 |
93. No, she did have the votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:20 PM Response to Reply #93 |
99. Well, there's reality, and there's the land of flying unicorns. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 01:23 PM Response to Reply #93 |
107. Wow, if Nancy Pelosi.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #107 |
122. She needed a simple majority, Dave. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #122 |
123. Of BOTH houses and then Bush had to sign it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #123 |
125. You're confused. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 03:39 PM Response to Reply #125 |
129. Perhaps. But, if so, it's not entirely my fault. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 03:54 PM Response to Reply #129 |
130. I don't see why this is so hard to follow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 04:01 PM Response to Reply #130 |
131. I see what you mean now and I agree (to an extent). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conscious evolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 05:10 PM Response to Reply #74 |
139. She did not need the votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:02 PM Response to Reply #46 |
84. self delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
2. Cindy's part of a nefarious conspiracy to actually hold our elected officials accountable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:39 AM Response to Reply #2 |
10. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark Twain Girl (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:57 AM Response to Reply #10 |
82. I second that... !! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MuseRider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:07 AM Response to Reply #2 |
36. BRAVO! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:07 AM Response to Reply #2 |
37. Imagine if it were to spread, what the consequenses might be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
3. destroying the corporate kleptomaniacs that controls both parties. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
4. I just think she's getting (and taking) bad advice. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crikkett (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
5. An overwhelming desire for justice and to be of service to her fellow citizens? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
6. Thanks to Cindy Sheehan we lost Florida in 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:13 AM Response to Reply #6 |
45. Keyboard...coffee...your fault |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
9. Where's the proof of fabrication? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:39 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Um...there is no proof...that's why it's fabrication. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:44 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Where's the proof behind Nancy's claims? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:45 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:48 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I must be mistaken. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #24 |
49. You just made an all-time disingenuous statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #49 |
54. She was Speaker before the election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:26 AM Response to Reply #54 |
63. Again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:39 AM Response to Reply #63 |
76. You're looking further than my intent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:25 AM Response to Reply #49 |
62. I may make mistakes here or there but I don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:01 AM Response to Reply #19 |
29. Nancy has been plugging away at ethics reform and doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:08 AM Response to Reply #29 |
40. She has had some legislative successes, that's true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #40 |
53. We sure do live in "interesting" times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:22 AM Response to Reply #53 |
61. I'm in agreement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
19jet54 (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
13. She lost her son... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philosophie_en_rose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
14. Delusions of grandeur and financial necessity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
15. She's furious with Nancy, of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
16. I have no idea what the underlying shady reason is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
17. I think she's determined to make a difference and quite naive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:44 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. There must be an underlying shady reason. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:47 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
18. The underlying reason is not shady. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
21. Because she's with the terrorists. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
25. I am curious why the author of this thread has started so many "I hate Sheehan" threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 10:58 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. For reasons that are similar to those why I say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
19jet54 (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:00 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. A differnt world under Gore... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:01 AM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Nader reads DU? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:14 AM Response to Reply #30 |
47. No, but scapegoats are a time tested means of diverting people from the real issues, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:18 AM Response to Reply #47 |
55. Yep. It's the woods for the trees problem. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:08 AM Response to Reply #25 |
39. Me too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NavyDavy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:33 AM Response to Reply #25 |
71. should be more.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:13 PM Response to Reply #25 |
90. Maybe because he doesn't like Sheehan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
churchofreality (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
27. Its funny how many of you think everything can be solved by 3rd party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:06 AM Response to Reply #27 |
35. I haven't seen anyone on this thread say everything can be solved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puglover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
31. Why haven't you heard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:04 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Would that make Cindy's comment asinine as well? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laststeamtrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:30 AM Response to Reply #31 |
69. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swimboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:54 AM Response to Reply #31 |
80. Dahlink |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
33. Yes, darn it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:08 AM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Those are her stated reasons, not the underlying shady ones. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:14 AM Response to Reply #38 |
48. Projection perhaps? Or maybe you've just been dealing in politics too long |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #48 |
50. This is not projection. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:20 AM Response to Reply #50 |
59. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #59 |
95. I guess it matters where you are coming from. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
34. Her "sordid intentions" are to save her country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:09 AM Response to Reply #34 |
41. A DLC flamewaring Hillaryite scared of little old Cindy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:10 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Hillaryite? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tjwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #43 |
51. Are you now, or have you ever, been a member of the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:19 AM Response to Reply #41 |
57. You're the same person who accused me of being a "DLCer", as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
42. I personally think she's crazy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:11 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. she's hit sometalk shows..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:19 AM Response to Reply #44 |
58. I'll bet they do... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:21 AM Response to Reply #44 |
60. Because they're too stupid to understand what she's doing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
52. What underlying shady reason do you have for trashing Cindy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
64. The question I have is, Cindy is running because she wants impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:31 AM Response to Reply #64 |
70. no answers to your question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:52 AM Response to Reply #64 |
79. It's a valid question, one no one answers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:17 PM Response to Reply #64 |
97. Guerilla theater |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:17 PM Response to Reply #64 |
98. Excellent question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
65. i know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
66. Posters to this board already made it necessary for Skinner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:34 AM Response to Reply #66 |
72. I have not made any accusations against Cindy Sheehan in this post... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:40 AM Response to Reply #72 |
77. Aim low. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
67. Maybe Cindy even likes Greg Palast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishnfla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
68. Cindy supporters need to be careful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
73. I heard she's been holding secret meetings with Nader under bridges. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
75. She gets a monthly check from the Kremlin..or, Havana,...or, Caracas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #75 |
134. Her checks come from Faux Noise Channel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 05:05 PM Response to Reply #134 |
136. Please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #134 |
137. They're probably lost in the mail..like the ones we didn't get when we protested LBJ's war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidwparker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
78. Cindy Sheehan running has really upset your apple cart. How many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:55 AM Response to Reply #78 |
81. I agree that anyone can run for office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:02 PM Response to Reply #81 |
86. If she can't hack scrutiny, then she can't hack public office... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidwparker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #81 |
108. It's not the criticism. I was noticing that the poster had several comments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. In case you haven't noticed, I have a strong dislike for third parties. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
83. "Bev Harris" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:08 PM Response to Reply #83 |
87. The sad thing is that at a deep level, I feel very sorry for her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:13 PM Response to Reply #87 |
92. I agree. She's lost focus. And there appears to be a cult like mentality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
85. I think she genuinely wants to stop the dying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndreaCG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
88. If Sheehan wants to run, let her do so in the Democratic primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madspirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
89. What Underlying Shady Reason Do You Have For Attacking Cindy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:13 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. To point out that it's not nice to talk like that. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:15 PM Response to Reply #91 |
94. Says the guy with a "Fuck Nader" av. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:17 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. Nader has threatened the lives of millions of people every four years since 1996. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:20 PM Response to Reply #96 |
100. And like the Repubs you find a reason why your behavior is ok while criticizing it in others. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turn CO Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
101. Cindy Sheehan would not be running as a Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:48 PM Response to Reply #101 |
102. Bravo...............well written..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 01:17 PM Response to Reply #101 |
105. DU attacks Cindy no matter what. When she expresses an opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turn CO Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #105 |
112. Not just DU. Markos himself troll-rated Cindy on DKos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 02:51 PM Response to Reply #112 |
113. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 02:58 PM Response to Reply #113 |
115. Could you please post a link where Cindy called Mr. Conyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #115 |
118. When she spewed her Libertarian, isolationist bs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 03:16 PM Response to Reply #118 |
119. Sorry, I must have missed the link in all that venom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 03:25 PM Response to Reply #119 |
120. I'm sorry that you feel that way. It's not venom, it's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #120 |
121. I don't want to offend you. Did Cindy call Mr. Conyers a chickenhawk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #121 |
124. Why is it so difficult for you to see that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 03:37 PM Response to Reply #124 |
127. Okay! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. Kos has rules. That's fine. So does DU . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turn CO Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #114 |
116. If she isn't singling out Conyers then why is she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #116 |
117. Can you provide a link where Mr. Conyers, the House member |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turn CO Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #117 |
126. I am not following you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 03:39 PM Response to Reply #126 |
128. Your #112 on this thread: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turn CO Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #128 |
138. I will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 07:28 PM Response to Reply #138 |
142. By Cindy's logic you petition John Conyers because HE IS THE CHAIR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turn CO Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #114 |
141. She compares Dems to Repubs all the time since last Oct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 07:38 PM Response to Reply #141 |
143. No, she approached John Conyers because he is the Chair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 05:13 PM Response to Reply #112 |
140. My question is, why hasn't Skinner done the same? {nt} |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #105 |
135. Links to where she's been accused of having "lost her focus"? I haven't heard that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 07:47 PM Response to Reply #135 |
144. There are posts like that right in this thread. So, upthread, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
103. you disappoint me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 12:58 PM Response to Reply #103 |
104. My polls are typically simple yes/no questions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 02:15 PM Response to Reply #104 |
110. if it's one thing you don't do, it's push poLLing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
106. Politics and power over the law of the land. That's as slimy as it gets. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainegreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
111. Gee LoZoccolo, I don't know. Maybe because she's doing it because she's secretly republican? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
132. Cindy's Revenge on DU for bashing her so much: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
133. Obviously she's fighting against the party of slavery. Duh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-12-07 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
145. To piss you off... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 07:50 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC