Onlooker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-13-07 05:33 AM
Original message |
| Bush executive office costs billions more than Clinton's? |
|
I found this linked from Digg. Assuming it's correct, what do you make of it? http://benmoseley.com/bush_pay_raise.html |
| aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-13-07 05:43 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. That's an awful lot of paper clips. |
|
Has anybody asked those thieves to account for their spending. Like, with receipts?
|
| aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-13-07 05:44 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. BTW, toss it to Olberman. And Stewart. |
| Rosemary2205
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-13-07 05:56 AM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Good God almighty. Yes, bounce to KO and maybe Brian Williams - Recommended |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-13-07 05:57 AM by Rosemary2205
I knew they were looting the treasury through earmarks, subsidies, gov't contracts and war but I had no idea they were actually just stuffing cash into their pockets!
|
| liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-13-07 06:02 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Fiscal conservatives at work |
| wakeme2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-13-07 06:29 AM
Response to Original message |
| 5. funny stuff is going on |
|
2000 under Clinton executive was 283 million... 2005 under Bush 7,686 over SEVEN BILLION more..
But also look at Dept of Labor 39 Billion in 2000 under Clinton BUT for some reason it jumps to 69 Billion in 2003 and then starts coming down.
There is some cooked books here IMHO..
|
| Rosemary2205
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-13-07 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 6. AND a complicit GAO and Congress |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Mon May 06th 2024, 06:28 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
